<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treyarch Taking Call of Duty Back To WWII?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2007/12/treyarch_taking_call_of_duty_b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2007/12/treyarch_taking_call_of_duty_b/</link>
	<description>the Gamer&#039;s Guide &#124; Computer and video game news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:22:42 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2007/12/treyarch_taking_call_of_duty_b/comment-page-1/#comment-16497</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2007/12/treyarch_taking_call_of_duty_b.html#comment-16497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I say bring on a WW1 FPS. Trench warfare, low fire rate guns, early tanks &amp; biplanes.... it would slow the game down, but I think that will also work better from the strategy angle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say bring on a WW1 FPS. Trench warfare, low fire rate guns, early tanks &#038; biplanes&#8230;. it would slow the game down, but I think that will also work better from the strategy angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
