<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Speaks Out On LittleBigPlanet Moderation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/11/sony_speaks_out_on_littlebigplanet_moderation-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/11/sony_speaks_out_on_littlebigplanet_moderation-2/</link>
	<description>the Gamer&#039;s Guide &#124; Computer and video game news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:47:23 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Poo</title>
		<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/11/sony_speaks_out_on_littlebigplanet_moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8071</link>
		<dc:creator>Poo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/11/sony_speaks_out_on_littlebigplanet_moderation-2.html#comment-8071</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So... what&#039;s the story with the original included level of a stripclub with pole dancing beavers?!?!?!? I mean is that entirely appropriate for &quot;all ages&quot;? I&#039;m fine with it, but it doesn&#039;t seem to stand up to Sony&#039;s specification...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, and is it just me or has the LBP servers been down for a day or two now??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; what&#8217;s the story with the original included level of a stripclub with pole dancing beavers?!?!?!? I mean is that entirely appropriate for &#8220;all ages&#8221;? I&#8217;m fine with it, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to stand up to Sony&#8217;s specification&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, and is it just me or has the LBP servers been down for a day or two now??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penguar</title>
		<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/11/sony_speaks_out_on_littlebigplanet_moderation-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Penguar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/11/sony_speaks_out_on_littlebigplanet_moderation-2.html#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sony is deleting MUCH MORE than copyright infringement.  If someone complains about a level using the Good Grief mechanism (aka snitch on your friends mechanism) - then it goes into a list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many levels are being deleted without copyright infringement or other bad content.  The only explanation is that Sony / Media Molecule doesn&#039;t have the manpower to examine each level and determine its appropriateness - instead they peformed a mass deletion last Sunday/Monday and most likely will continue to do so based upon snitches or other mal-intented people determine for whatever reason in getting a level offline.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People have gone to Sam - Sony&#039;s representative - to try to get their levels back online - and he has not looked at the levels or attempted to fix the problem - just more evidence they don&#039;t have the manpower or good faith to help their community which is giving them so much money for their release - and authors who are increasing its value.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basically they are screwing their community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Their attempt is here is nothing more than damage control - the truth is that they are not going to authors to work out the problems - they just performed a mass deletion and don&#039;t want to devote money to helping users fix supposed issues - but more probably devote money into examining and negotiating and interpreting users complaints using the Good Grief (aka snitch) mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let me explain how this works - you see something in a level you don&#039;t like as a user - you press a button and it takes a snapshot.  You have about 10 sample words to choose one from from as to why it is bad (e.g. Offensive or Copyright Violation) and then its submitted.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Next thing you know - the levels are deleted.  No comment from Sony or Media Molecule - no notice - no recourse - and even the person from Sony who said he would help, named Sam, has not helped anyone to get their level back online.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes - people are pissed and rightfully so, and its much more than the number Sony has said have been affected.  If it was that small - they could easily handle it in a couple days contacting people and working with them - but this is NOT being done.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony is deleting MUCH MORE than copyright infringement.  If someone complains about a level using the Good Grief mechanism (aka snitch on your friends mechanism) &#8211; then it goes into a list.</p>
<p>Many levels are being deleted without copyright infringement or other bad content.  The only explanation is that Sony / Media Molecule doesn&#8217;t have the manpower to examine each level and determine its appropriateness &#8211; instead they peformed a mass deletion last Sunday/Monday and most likely will continue to do so based upon snitches or other mal-intented people determine for whatever reason in getting a level offline.</p>
<p>People have gone to Sam &#8211; Sony&#8217;s representative &#8211; to try to get their levels back online &#8211; and he has not looked at the levels or attempted to fix the problem &#8211; just more evidence they don&#8217;t have the manpower or good faith to help their community which is giving them so much money for their release &#8211; and authors who are increasing its value.</p>
<p>Basically they are screwing their community.</p>
<p>Their attempt is here is nothing more than damage control &#8211; the truth is that they are not going to authors to work out the problems &#8211; they just performed a mass deletion and don&#8217;t want to devote money to helping users fix supposed issues &#8211; but more probably devote money into examining and negotiating and interpreting users complaints using the Good Grief (aka snitch) mechanism.</p>
<p>Let me explain how this works &#8211; you see something in a level you don&#8217;t like as a user &#8211; you press a button and it takes a snapshot.  You have about 10 sample words to choose one from from as to why it is bad (e.g. Offensive or Copyright Violation) and then its submitted.  </p>
<p>Next thing you know &#8211; the levels are deleted.  No comment from Sony or Media Molecule &#8211; no notice &#8211; no recourse &#8211; and even the person from Sony who said he would help, named Sam, has not helped anyone to get their level back online.</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; people are pissed and rightfully so, and its much more than the number Sony has said have been affected.  If it was that small &#8211; they could easily handle it in a couple days contacting people and working with them &#8211; but this is NOT being done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
