It’s possible that for an established game series they can get it approved by the OFLC by simply paying the fee and telling them that it’s like the previous one with a slight graphics upgrade and gameplay tweaks. It’s not as if the classification for something as consistent as an EA Sports game is ever going to change.
EA still can’t bowl or bat if they did make a game anyway, they’ve yet to surpass their Cricket 96 effort imo (which I got for free using Weetbix coupons). Codemasters have a better chance at delivering a good spin bowl
If you have an iPhone, get ‘Cricket Game’ by Spinfast to deliver the goods for now
NegativeZero
April 9, 2009 at 6:51 PM
It’s possible that for an established game series they can get it approved by the OFLC by simply paying the fee and telling them that it’s like the previous one with a slight graphics upgrade and gameplay tweaks. It’s not as if the classification for something as consistent as an EA Sports game is ever going to change.
Report PermalinkRUFiO
April 9, 2009 at 8:24 PM
Cricket? How about another AFL game!
Report Permalinkbackslashio
April 10, 2009 at 2:49 AM
EA still can’t bowl or bat if they did make a game anyway, they’ve yet to surpass their Cricket 96 effort imo (which I got for free using Weetbix coupons). Codemasters have a better chance at delivering a good spin bowl
If you have an iPhone, get ‘Cricket Game’ by Spinfast to deliver the goods for now
Report PermalinkDaBow
April 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM
Given the ashes series is just around the corner, it is surprising to see EA lying to us, surely, the Wii would be the perfect platform?
Report PermalinkJikao
April 10, 2009 at 8:11 PM
Aussie board even changed Cricket 9 to Cricket 09 on request from CricketGaming.net. That means it was existing.
Report PermalinkEA suks
October 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM
F**** EA AND THEIR EMPLOYEE’S
Report Permalink