
“I’m stammering because I’ve tried to explain to my wife how it works, and I haven’t been able to,” Erik Wolpaw, co-writer of Valve’s Portal 2 said last week, answering a question from a moderator about Valve’s game-making process. “She doesn’t believe that it should work.”
What could this certain-to-fail-yet-somehow-it-doesn’t process be?
“It’s just, like, everybody kind of pitches in and order sort of emerges from that chaos,” he said.
Absurd! Borderline Communist! Or… genius?
Wolpaw, who doesn’t just write at Valve but does a tiny bit of programming and a smidge here or there of other stuff, said the secret is in the willingness to be a proven failure. That’s where all that “order” comes from. “A lot of that is the playtesting,” he explained. “You know, it’s forcing people to put their ideas to the test and watch a lot of people go through it. It’s hard to keep defending some idea when you see it fail repeatedly. It would take this huge act of hubris to cling to something. It’s kind of a humbling experience. It’s sort of liberating in a way, because you expect all sorts of things to fail. People get used to just not feeling like ‘I’ve really got to cling to this idea because this is my idea and I worked on it.’… Most of the ideas don’t pan out.”
Subject yourselves to the scrutiny of the average person, game developers, and you too can work the Valve way.
Wolpaw’s full NYU presentation – covering Valve’s methodology, Portal 2 heroine Chell’s reluctance to speak, and plenty more – was recorded by the University and is scheduled to be posted online soon.



















TvZ
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 7:55 AMMaybe, because they sit down and take some time to think about a story line, and fit the coding to it. Rather than throwing a few guns in and think about a story line to fit the guns.
ndroste
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 9:14 AMSo I’ve got this idea for a game… it’s about a gun that shoots portals.
natooman
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 10:35 AMPortal “DEVICE” sir, Portal device. I don’t see any in-game representation of violence when a portal device is shot straight at something, Therefore, it is never used as a gun and, therefore, it is not a gun.
Karachi King
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 10:55 AMSince a gun doesn’t necessary cause violence (glue gun, pricing gun, etc), I think portal gun is perfectly acceptable.
gus
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 6:11 PMit’s also referred to in the game itself as a “portal gun”
tom
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 9:51 AMValve is the bomb. Others should pay attention to what they do.
Captain Pajama Shark
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 10:14 AMIt’s common sense really.
Something that I feel is in very short supply at the moment.
Nate
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 11:27 AMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal_%28video_game%29#Concept
How the concept of the original Portal game/idea came about, interesting to know, Valve can’t take all the credit :P
ablue
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 12:16 PMShut up and give me ep3
mattroe
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 8:12 PMCan we ever get an article about Valve without this being blurted out by someone? I’m sure one guy doing an interview REALLY took a chunk out of ep3′s development time.