The motion picture beats the still image again. Sure, today’s new Battlefield 3 screenshots were impressive. But this trailer, showing a 64-player battle in the game’s Caspian Sea level, looks better.
The motion picture beats the still image again. Sure, today’s new Battlefield 3 screenshots were impressive. But this trailer, showing a 64-player battle in the game’s Caspian Sea level, looks better.
Chuloopa
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 7:38 AMholy crap.. that looks epic…
AND I’M NOT EBEN REALLY A FAN OF THESE SORTS OF GAMES! :|
Chuloopa Molyneux
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:50 AMThat being said… i would much prefer to be piloting pure unadulterated euphoria
I'm Prison Mike
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:07 AMI haven’t been this excited for a game since Perfect Dark!
Manny
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:42 AMOhh God! that is pure eye candy.
PuppyLicks
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:54 AMWow… Battlefield is back.
AAAAAANNND HOW!
CWest
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:56 AMLOL!!! Best part was at 1:33. Funny remote control car!
Di11enger
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:16 AMi nearly fell off my chair
FPS
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:56 AMWhy can’t I feel my jaw, oh wait it’s on the ground.
NotoriousR
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:01 AMWant.
Tom
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:04 AMDamn. I’m already excited beyond belief for this game, but oh man that looked amazing
mchaza
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:04 AMOMG This is what i want, 64 MP goodness with tanks, planes and ground support vehicles and troops.
Now why the **** does EA have to screw this all up with no MOD support ?????? This game could of been epic and would of sold way more copies on PC.
NotoriousR
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:46 AMNo mods = more maps they can let you buy = more money for them = happy EA.
Matt
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:06 AMBut so far they havent charged for maps, all free for VIP members (anyone who bought the game new or bought the access code). The only things they charged for were Vietnam (completely separate MP),onslaught mode and spec op kits in BFBC2. And they said that Frostbite 2 is too complex to release mod tools anyway. I think you are confusing EA for activision here ;)
thyco
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 1:44 PMthe original Battlefield never had an mod support either until it was like a year old. Infact lots and lots of games never had mod support or SDKs yet modders found a way
J-Rod
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:21 AMHope ps3 version has a epicness to it’s MP too :/
Chris M
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 4:38 PMConsoles are only going to have 32 player MP because the hardware is so shitty and outdated (within 6 months of release) that the platform cannot handle the extra players.
Velnica
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:25 AMI never kept up with the BF3 news… but 64 man brawl!? ZOMG want!
Scared
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:30 AMDO WANT!
Lord Crumplebottom
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:33 AMVery nice and back to 64 player servers too. Only one thing stopping me considering getting BF3 – Origin.
Morkai
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:06 AMcan you explain to me why please? i understand that a lot of people want the majority of their games linked to a steam account, but is opening another launcher instead of steam really going to kill your entire enjoyment of the game?
Lord Crumplebottom
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:31 AMIt’s got nothing to do with Steam and everything about having to pay to extend the ability to download a game you’ve purchased. To a maximum of 5 years extension. After that? Purchase the game again. It’s a crappy business model and I simply don’t support it.
“Get it on disc then”, I hear you say. Well that certainly is an option – but by default EA would still think I support Origin and their payment policy.
Lord Crumplebottom
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:35 AMLet alone the fact it’s based on EADM and that was a horrendous mess with support alone. Your newly purchased key doesn’t work? EA say “tough, buy another key”.
You’d be better off just giving your money away, to random people on the street, in cases like that.
Sam
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:40 AManyone heard if they have system link on the console versions?
Luke
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:46 AMfarout.
i dont get this 64 man battle thing, BC2 had that, so is it 64V64, or 64 all up? :/
mechjman
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:54 AMBC2 had 32 player aka 16v16. So BF3 PC version is 64 so 32v32 player.
Marathon
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:13 AMOkay I’m sold. Want.
RB
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:19 AMAnd the memories of many a late night playing BF2 come flooding back…
BC1/2 can go suck it, THIS is what the BF series is all about! Stupidly Epic Massive PC Multiplayer CARNAGE!
Raif
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:22 AMI want the PC version so bad…but my pc is shit:(
Andy
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 8:03 PMthen upgrade it really doesnt cost as much as you think. if u currently have a dual core which like everyone has since like 2000 just slap in a semi new graphics card and you can play it. can get gt430′s for like $58 and that can easily handle bf3
Reign
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:38 AMSeriously considering cancelling my console preorder to wait until I can get a new PC. >_>
Brodie
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:41 AMDo we know if it has LAN play yet? I’m hoping it does, as BF2 is still a favourite at LANs in my town.
Jun tao
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:19 AMHAHA wow… F-18 vs SU-27
Take that train-tracked Ancient Warfare 3 lol
Man Bobby Kotick must be shitting his pants after seeing this.
I bet he’d give his right testicle to try out the beta (If only EA let him)
Subby
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 9:49 PMNot to nitpick but it’s the modernised SU-35 with 3D thrust-vectoring. An absolute beast of manouverability..
elhombre
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:32 AMThis clip just killed any moral or inner doubts I have about Origin. Origin client now installed. Preorder purchased. Let the battle commence.
THXultra
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:55 AMNow that is sweet! If the masses dont buy this instead of Call of Duty, they is to far gone…
Machine
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 11:56 AMawesome :o
Svenare
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 12:30 PMIt may have some pretty post processing visuals, but It has nothing of Arma3, 64 players is nothing, Arma2 supported hundreds.
ToastyFresh
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 3:01 PMYeah but Arma 2 is too difficult and the AI is voiced by GPSes :|
CJ
Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 5:25 PMLOL, true true. But ArmA is alot of fun when you’ve got a clan to play it with.