SoulCalibur Poster Is As Subtle As Arse Cheeks In The Face Can Be

And you thought the giant boobs were crass? Ha! This is another advert for upcoming fighting game SoulCalibur V. It’s cheeky. Literally.

The ad copy isn’t subtle, either. Over the thonged butt, it reads, “The series’ greatest masterpiece” in Japanese, a statement that later might prove more controversial than the giant arse depicted.

The full-page advertisement appeared in the Japanese tabloid Nikkan Sports, a publication aimed at Japanese salarymen and one that does not shy away from arse cheeks.

ソウルキャリバー5の広告が酷い!何このエロ広告www [オタク.com]

Discuss

(10 Comments)
  • [–]

    Ashley

    Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 8:53 AM

    Who cares. Who hasn’t seen an ad that shows an arse, or boobs to sell something.

    • [–]

      Azanode

      Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 10:58 AM

      There’s a difference between showing, and making the entire focal point of.

      • [–]

        Sam

        Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 11:44 AM

        Technically yes. Realistically I’d say that’s very much debateable, generally if you can see tits, they’re there for the exact same reason this arse is, the fact you can see face might get less people up in arms, but just because western marketers migth be more subtle at times doesn’t change what they’re really marketing.

        In some ways I find this advertisement a lot more honest, despite being stupid, since their whole thing was making SC V a game that could compete with the current gen of relatively balanced competitive fighting games. Namco seriously need a new marketing team

  • [–]

    Flexible Doodle

    Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 12:35 PM

    I wish they advertised it like that here :(

  • [–]

    borzale

    Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM

    Haha, the voldo one is worse.

    http://www.technologytell.com/gaming/files/2012/01/soul-calibur-v-voldo-ad-japan.jpg

    • [–]

      Cal

      Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 1:45 PM

      SOLD.

    • [–]

      Jiff

      Sunday, January 29, 2012 at 5:28 PM

      Hahahahaha!!

      Oh my god

  • [–]

    nick

    Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 6:26 PM

    Aren’t they supposed to be tongue-in-cheek?
    Seems less offensive to me than if they were to just be casually overt, if that makes any sense. This one actually comes off as creative to me.

    • [–]

      PiratePete1911

      Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 8:15 PM

      Haha! Tongue in cheek! I get it.

  • [–]

    rikku45

    Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 7:29 PM

    dont get why people get so upset about stuff like this :\

Join The Discussion