Game Characters Embarrassing Themselves On Facebook

Mario is a boozehound. Luigi loves photo bombs. Peach is vain. Some of gaming’s greatest characters get classic (and clever) Facebook pic parodies.

It’s not just Nintendo characters getting in on the act. There is Metal Gear Solid’s Snake, whose military pic I saw coming. While not embarrassing, Nathan Drake’s family photo is definitely revealing.

Another revelation: I had no idea that Fox McCloud was such a hipster dickwad. Who knew!

More phony Facebook photos in the link below. Be sure to read the comments under each photo. They’re a hoot.

Facebook des héros de jeux vidéos [Retro Nouveau]

Discuss

(24 Comments)
  • [–]

    UberRoxor

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 6:09 PM

    Top quality stuff. Someone give Ashcraft a Pulizter.

  • [–]

    John

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 6:17 PM

    Makes me glad I am not on FB!

  • [–]

    DR_DOAK

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 6:39 PM

    Another slow news day I see.

  • [–]

    rekuhs

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 7:07 PM

    So many of these ‘articles’ are simply pics from Facebook.

    I can use Facebook, can I have a job?

  • [–]

    Lobo

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 7:22 PM

    I would like to issue a challenge to any of the naysayers, write something you think people would like to read. It has to be ‘real news’ of course, seeing as these ‘hurr reposts’ and ‘slow news day pieces’ apparently aren’t any good.

    The fact of the matter is, without these smaller, ‘odd spot’ pieces, there would be nothing to post. Our industry doesnt always have a million big newsworthy stories going on. These little tidbits serve as a glimpse into some of the interesting, albeit not headline making events.

    • [–]

      rekuhs

      Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 7:32 PM

      I don’t write for a living so am therefore unlikely to put something together that you’d want to read.

      My issue here is that the majority of the posts that we get from some writers are simply one liners or just pictures.

      I don’t have anything against posts like this, it’d just be nice if they were also backed up with some decent, fleshed out content too.

    • [–]

      Chazz

      Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 7:48 PM

      Never criticised a movie or a book or tv show? How about an actor or actress or director? An athlete or sports team? If you have then I challenge you to do better in each respective field…

      • [–]

        Lobo

        Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 8:13 PM

        I’d be lying if I said I’d never criticized anything. However, I try to justify my criticisms by explaining what I thought the shortcomings in question were, and speculating on a possible remedy.

        While, I will concede that this is still me being critical, atleast I make an effort to justify myself.

        I think it’s interesting that a lot of the criticisms of the Kotaku US writers making one line posts that lack substance, are in the form of one line posts that lack substance.

        • [–]

          Chazz

          Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 8:23 PM

          You don’t need to write an essay to point out that these people are getting paid as journalists and are doing little more than reposting other people’s content with words better suited to a twitter post than a news article.

          • [–]

            Lobo

            Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 8:30 PM

            No, but apparently we do need to flog the same dead horse over and over again every time one of these type of articles is posted.

            We get it. Some people arent into it. Do we have to hear about it every day?

            • [–]

              Chazz

              Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 8:34 PM

              Do we have to see these posts everyday? It goes both ways.

              • [–]

                aaron

                Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 8:51 PM

                If you are frequently dissapointed by certain authors posts. Check who is the author of a post before clicking on the link. Avoid clicking on posts created by said authors.

                • [–]

                  Spyder

                  Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 11:33 PM

                  +1

                  Or, try reading the headline before you click on an article? Surely you’re (and I mean Chazz et al.) deliberately clicking through to an article you’re not even interested in reading just to post a complaint about said article… The beauty of the Internet is that YOU DON’T HAVE TO READ ANYTHING YOU DON’T WANT TO, and you don’t pay for any of it anyway, so you have no right to whine every time you see something you don’t like.

                  • [–]

                    Chazz

                    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 11:48 PM

                    You don’t have to read our comments either. So stop whining because you’ve seen something you don’t like…

                    • [–]

                      Jiff

                      Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 1:20 AM

                      I see you like attention

  • [–]

    Jordi

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 7:48 PM

    love it. Ignore the super critical dickwads

  • [–]

    PlasmaDavid

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 8:40 PM

    “I think it’s interesting that a lot of the criticisms of the Kotaku US writers making one line posts that lack substance, are in the form of one line posts that lack substance.”

    Nice.

  • [–]

    googootz

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 10:01 PM

    To be honest the reason I don’t like these types of articles on kotaku is because I see most of them on Reddit a week prior. I come to kotaku for news and I’m actually finding better websites for that. For me kotaku needs a feature similar to reddits sub-reddit feature that means we can go onto kotaku and have our account settings determine what we see. You only want to see ps3 news thats what you’ll see, you want to see articles about gaming culture and gaming related humor thats what you’ll see. At the moment its a bit of an ungainly beast that tries to do everything but presents it in a very poor way.

  • [–]

    [Razor]

    Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 11:58 PM

    With that daunting wall of debate above me, all I have to say is:

    At least it’s video game related.

    • [–]

      [Razor]

      Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 12:00 AM

      In addendum: Probably the best Ashcraft article in recent times?

  • [–]

    p tear griffin

    Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 6:42 AM

    wow its about gaming…………….FACEBOOK IS GAY

Join The Discussion