Reviewers Agree You Should Avoid Aliens: Colonial Marines Like The Plague

Not that they all agree, oh no. To call Aliens: Colonial Marines divisive would be an understatement. Reactions have ranged from disgust and feelings of betrayal, to indifference, and sometimes even awe and affection.

A lot of them think that there's more polish to Colonial Marines' multiplayer than its singleplayer, but how does that affect the overall picture? Here's a sampling of what they have to say.

Eurogamer

This certainly isn't a game that aims to shake things up. It's as basic as first-person shooting gets, with 11 campaign missions that involve little more than jogging from point A to point B, grabbing ammo, picking up armour and pressing buttons to open doors along the way. There's momentary pleasure in the way the creatures twitch under the sputtering fire of your pulse rifle, but that fleeting throwback to the movie is exhausted before the end of the first level. You may be playing as a Colonial Marine rather than just a space marine, and the monsters might be capital letter Aliens instead of mere aliens, but the framework is not so much set in stone as downright fossilised.


Gamespot

The Alien franchise deserves better than this. Aliens: Colonial Marines is a disappointing exercise in bland corridor shooting, dragged down by laughable dialogue and cooperative play that makes the game worse than when you adventure on your own. Colonial Marines is unremarkable in every conceivable way: it's far too easy, generally devoid of tension, and lacking in the variety it so desperately needed. It occasionally lets you peek at the game that could have been, allowing its rare scraps of unsettling atmosphere to seep into your bones. But brief moments of dread and excitement are quickly supplanted by more shrug-worthy shooting and a general aura of "whatever"-ness.


IGN

The point is that like any decent theme park attraction, Aliens: Colonial Marines presents a fairly convincing facade but its thrills are forced and entirely superficial. You don't ever feel like you're actually in danger. You don't ever feel overwhelmed. In fact, over the course of its six hour campaign the game never gets even remotely close to replicating the genuine feelings of fear and dread that simmer throughout James Cameron's cinematic classic, simply because its xenomorphic enemies are so mindless. These aliens aren't sophisticated human hunters, they're merely acid-fuelled fodder for the seemingly neverending rounds in your pulse rifle. Consequently, Colonial Marines is for the most part a disappointingly mundane, run ‘n' gun first-person shooter that fails to captivate once the initial rush of nostalgia has worn off. At its worst, it's simply feels unfinished — which is a surprise given how long it's been in development.


Edge Magazine

In its central exercise of man versus alien, Colonial Marines feels stiff, shallow and dated. First announced for a 2008 release before the Aliens franchise machine prioritised other projects, it feels like more work has been retained from that initial production period than either Gearbox or Sega would care to admit. The saying that follows fiascos around Hollywood is that nobody sets out to make a bad film; collaborations sour, commercial realities dawn, and sometimes, as seems to be the case with Colonial Marines, time simply passes. While the intentions of all concerned have no doubt been pure — Gearbox in its aim to create a true sequel to Cameron's punchy action hit, and 20th Century Fox in giving the developer a green light to tinker with the central thread of a billion-dollar film series — the final result is a familiar mismanagement of a rich and potent set of ideas and images. They deserve brighter and more sensitive custodianship than this.


Official Xbox Magazine

This is really a review of two games: a derivative story campaign (that you can play solo or with up to three friends in co-op) and a riveting, far superior multiplayer mode that allows you to compete as marines or alien xenomorphs in online matches. Considering Colonial Marines' relatively long gestation period — roughly six years — it seems more attention was paid to fine-tuning multiplayer than to the campaign.


Electronic Gaming Monthly

You'll visit familiar places, make use of all the equipment you'd expect, see a few old friends, and square off with a whole mess of uglies you might recall from childhood nightmares. I won't spoil too much here in terms of story, but suffice it to say that if you've ever watched an Alien film and gone "That was f***ing rad!" chances are you'll get an opportunity to experience the epicness at some point in the campaign.


Kotaku

A game based on existing media has three options. It can strive to be faithful to the original work, privileging authenticity above all else. It can try to do its own thing, using the original work as merely a jumping off point for something else. Or, it can try to find a balance between authenticity and originality. Aliens: Colonial Marines fails spectacularly at all three of these possible approaches.


Comments

    No surprises here, who keeps giving gearbox money?

      Free-thinking people who don't jump on internet bandwagons.

    Reports surfacing now are that the game was largely outsourced, but still no excuse for releasing an unfinished and unpolished product. Especially of such a popular Movie Franchise. Disappointed.

    Last edited 14/02/13 10:09 am

      I hope so, I can't imagine Gearbox putting something like this out, after Borderlands 2 :(

      Totally agree bud. NerVe logo appears on quite a few things within the game, if they were indeed the outsourcing company; how were they allowed to produce this - and more importantly why did Gearbox take credit for something that wasnt essentially theirs ?

    As far as I am concerned anyone that buys a game that has a big "collectible" in their special edition should go in with caution.

      What about the Bioshock Collector's Edition. That came with a big "collectible" namely a Big Daddy, and that's considered to be a great game. I loved it (except the end boss fight). Even the Batman: Arkham Asylum Collector's Edition came with a giant batarang, and I think it was one of the best games of this generation.

      To say that you should be careful about buying a game just because it comes with a big "collectible" I think is a bit silly.

      Last edited 14/02/13 12:04 pm

      I'm not convinced that a collectable in a special edition means the game is below par. LOTR War in the North CE was good, Max Payne 3, Borderlands 2, Skyrim, Halo: Reach, More of an alarm bell for me is a launch price that's well below normal; Sonic Generations and X-Men Destiny come to mind...

    Ironic how an article stating how badly reviewed Aliens Colonial Marines was, is sponsored by Aliens Colonial Marines.

      Yeah, Kotaku have ads for it plastered all over the site, but yet they've been bagging it all week.

      That said I've bought it, haven't played it yet as I ordered it from Ozgameshop and I'm still waiting for it to arrive.

      Apparently there's a big patch been released for it too.

      http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-14111-Aliens--Colonial-Marines-Patched--Details-Within.html

      Would you prefer the alternative? Suppressing all negative press to keep the advertiser happy?

        No, not at all, but I bet Sega won't be happy. Fair enough they don't like the game, but to take their money and advertise it and proceed to tell everyone how crap it is is a bit hypocritical.

        I never listen to what reviewers/critics have to say about games/movies etc. Just because they don't like it, it doesn't mean that I won't.

        Last edited 14/02/13 11:49 am

          That's not how advertising works. Sega pay to have their product visually promoted to the Kotaku's audience. That's it. Whatever Kotaku says about it is separate to that issue. If Sega doesn't like it, it's not Kotaku's job to stop writing critical reviews, it's Sega's job not to publish games that are steaming piles of poo.

          That's not hypocritical. They took money to advertise the game, not to say it's good. The latter would be fairly unethical.

    What game was EGM playing? did they review the trailer? 9/10 for this piece of crap.

    Aliens and Starship troopers. two movies that are perfect to be made into a multiplayer FPS. why can't anyone get it right?

      They played the "cheque from SEGA" game.

      If you read the review, it strongly reeks of "I didn't play this game but wanted to be the first out the door with my review".

      I bet the EGM reviewer feels like this:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC-FFCbd3_k

    It's hilariously ironic how much advertising for ACM is appearing on this page. After a quick scan and I can count 13 instances of the ACM logo appearing. FAIL.

      Or you could take a positive view and see that it is a good thing that just because a company is willing to pay for advertising they are not getting preferential (lying to us about it) treatment

      I don't think it's either ironic or hilarious, just kind of sad, really.

    man this game was bad. my favourite bad part, i think, was when you had to walk through a service area under the floor, and aliens kept busting holes down through the ceiling to swipe at you. felt just like the Gremlins ride at Movieworld - so bad.

      Couldn't tell from your Steam messages haha! :P

      I tried to play last night by going straight to Multiplayer but the graphics are so effed up that I can't even play to see how Gearbox did that. I might have to resort back to the latest AVP just to get my Aliens fix methinks...

      Last edited 14/02/13 11:38 am

        yeah, Harb said it best: $35 for 3 Borderlands 2 Golden Keys...

    Calling the campaign generic and disappointing is fair, but a lot of reviewers seem to be getting offended that it wasn't a GOTY.
    Regardless, playing multi removed any regrets I had about buying the game.

      I think they are offended that it wouldn't have been competitive for game of the year in 2001.

        OK, more specifically: what right do they have to be offended?

          No no, you're doing it wrong. Everyone has the right to be offended, just like everyone has the right to not give a shit if you're offended. Remember Stephen Fry!

          Well, for starters the game shouldn't have been released in its current state - I'm offended on behalf of people who paid for it in advance. They should push for a refund. I'm also offended by the misleading 'game play' video which doesn't include anything in the final game. But don't take my word for it - Jim Sterling over at Destructoid does a much better job of explaining why he's outraged.

          But I agree with Razor.

    I actually really like the HUD for Aliens:CM. Looks awesome.

    What the hell happened???
    http://www.videogamer.com/videos/aliens_colonial_marines_what_the_hell_happened_to_aliens_colonial_marines_2.html

      wow, just watched that. Can't believe how different it looks from the demo. I hope Gearbox can explain themselves here.

    Aaaahhhh EGM.

    Halo 4 - 7/10

    Aliens CM - 9/10

    Thanks for confirming that you are no longer a relevant publication.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now