Makes sense as this is, perhaps, the Super Famicom’s most dubious unlicensed game: SM Teacher.
Picture: Yugiya
Note: This article contains content some readers might find objectionable.
Recently, Twitter user No3_hiyamugi uploaded the following pic from the game’s instruction booklet. The underlined section reads, “You can use your right hand freely” (右手は自由に使えます or “migi te wa jiyuu ni tsukaemasu). The image has been retweeted over 7000 times.
So, yes, this is an unofficial, mid-1990s Super Famicom game for adults. While none of the SM Teacher games ever got the Nintendo Seal of Approval (for damn good reason!) and were sold for “Super Famico” to avoid legal troubles, website Gaming Sanctuary says its developers claimed they made five thousand copies of SM Teacher: Volume 2 Remix. Five thousand!
In the top photo, you can see the game’s proper box in a photo from used game retailer Yugiya. Below, you can see the one of the carts. Website Super Famicom UK explains that the SM Teacher titles were often reflashed from Zico’s Soccer.
Picture:AucFan
However, some of the carts had better stickers that completely covered up the original game. Somewhat. Like so:
Picture:学園祭６わらしべブログ
Obviously, this game might churn many players’ stomachs, but as Gaming Sanctuary adds, this one of the rarest Super Famicom carts around. In the past, Play Asia has sold Volume 2 Remix, but the title appears to be currently sold out.
スーファミのエロゲーの説明書、何度見ても画期的すぎる [No3_hiyamugi]
Comments
5 responses to “Pervy Super Famicom Game Lets You Play One-Handed”
It does? What is this, prude-network-international?
Also, I hope they made some of those 5000 units ‘left-handed’ models 😉
Esp when they dont post that disclaimer in their articles accusing people of rape.
But no, a masturbation video game needs the disclaimer.
The only mention is a single line. ‘You can use your right hand freely’, which even then is a vague innuendo.
The rest of the article [and it’s pictures] are spent about the quality of the cartridge labels.
So wait, the “objectionable content” was mentioning that the game allows you to play with one hand? You didn’t even discuss the most important part!
Was the game good? Was it informative? Was it just straight up wank material or did it actually have some good ideas for things to do in the bedroom?
“Obviously, this game might churn many players’ stomachs”
“Obviously”? WHY? It is not “obvious” from the content of the article.