[Photo: Oliver Strewe | Getty]
Today in Osaka, a District Court ruled that tattooer Taiki Masuda broke the law by tattooing without a medical licence.
Police raided Masuda’s studio in 2015, and he was told to pay a fine. Instead of coughing up the cash, Masuda took the police to court on the grounds that tattooing was an art and not a medical practice.
“This is an unprecedented case,” Masuda’s attorney Takeshi Mikami told The Washington Post earlier this year. “The prosecutors’ position that tattooing should be performed only by doctors is an overreach. This case goes against common sense.”
As I wrote in my book Japanese Tattoos: History * Culture * Design, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare classified tattooing as a medical procedure in 2001 because a needle pierces the skin and inserts ink.
The government, however, does not issue tattoo licenses. This classification has long put tattooing into a legal grey zone.
Such ambiguity isn’t new to tattooing in Japan. In the years after World War II, tattooing was legalised in Japan, but the practice had been previously banned in the late 19th century.
There are many reasons why tattooing has been blighted in Japan, including the long-standing cultural thinking that getting a tattoo was disrespectful to your parents, because you were defacing the body they had bestowed. In the 20th century, especially in the decades after WWII, tattoos became symbols of the yakuza, which didn’t help the art in the PR department.
According to AFP, the judge who issued today’s ruling stated it was “reasonable” that tattooers in Japan have medical licenses to prevent health problems, adding that “bacteria and viruses are likely to penetrate (the body) and there is a risk of causing skin problems.”
Masuda was sentenced to a 150,000-yen ($US1,300 ($1,655)) fine, which was half the original penalty.
The organisation Save Tattooing in Japan that has been helping Masuda has been pushing for tattooing licenses and regulations to ensure safety. Today’s ruling could establish precedent for authorities to go after more tattooers instead of helping to create a safe tattooing environment.
In other countries, tattooers have worked with local governments and doctors to establish guidelines and regulations. That would seem to be a more logical way to handle this issue instead of requiring tattooers to become doctors so they can practice their craft.
“I do not accept this ruling. I’m practicing art and tattooing is a part of traditional Japanese culture,” Masuda is quoted by The Japan Times (full disclosure: I am a columnist there).
Asahi reports that since the ruling was announced, Masuda’s lawyers have filed an appeal to the higher courts.
Comments
6 responses to “Osaka Court’s Ruling Helps Destroy Tattoos In Japan ”
Now if they could just make smoking illegal, I would be tempted to move here for good (currently in Japan for holidays).
Making tattoos illegal has made you want to live there?
;P just being cheeky, cuz I don’t like tatts.
Already like Japan, but don’t wanna live here (not for the moment at least). I hate smokers more tho, I can’t breathe when I smell tobacco smoke.
tatoo’s and cigarette’s… different strokes for different folks i guess.
What about the used lady underwear they sell in vending type machines? Do you not think that’s a little bit more of an issue than cigarettes and ink? Quite disgusting lol. I truly wonder about some people.
What about them?
Not that ever saw them in vending machines, did find a few sex shops with a bit of that but hey. To each their own.
Hah, yeah that’s creepy but I think it’s just a fake thing for extremely lonely weirdos. Other than hearing about it in media, I haven’t seen such a thing actually existing, so tatts and smoking are a much higher priority than this one weird thing that might exist in one dodgy corner of the whole country.