real world
ESRB Levels Thorough Pre-Emptive Strike
Posted by Kotaku US Edition at 10:40 AM on April 24, 2008
As excited as the gaming community is about the impending release of GTA IV, sadly, a new Grand Theft Auto title tends to mean bracing ourselves for a new round of anti-gaming attacks from the uninformed. Fortunately, the Entertainment Software Ratings Board is more than prepared to head 'em off at the pass, joining with the Parent-Teacher Association for a series of parental education initiatives kicked off with a webcast tonight.
ESRB president Patricia Vance, PTA president Jan Harpe Domini, and Andrew Bub of GamerDad.com spared nothing in an accessible, deliberate explanation not only of the ratings system, but in clarifying for parents how to open a dialogue on media exposure with their kids.
Vance reminded the webcast's audience, comprised in large part of parents and PTA members, that the average age of gamers is actually 33 years old — just as with books and movies, she said, there are games for all ages. It was noted that, despite M-rated games receiving the largest share of attention in the media, only about six percent of titles on the market receive that rating. The largest portion of available titles fall under the "E for Everyone 10+" umbrella.
In addition to checking the ratings, Vance noted that parents can reference content descriptors on a game's package to learn what elements earned the game its rating, and encouraged them to check other parts of a game's package, like its title or display screenshots, to inform themselves.
"We want parents to understand the important role they play in their children's video game activity, and it's their responsibility to ensure they have every opportunity to seek out every help they can get to make sure their child's safe and secure in what they're doing, and that they know what they're doing," said Harpe Domini.
Added Vance, "It's never been easier to get control over what your kids are playing... it's just a very easy thing with ratings and parental controls... there's really no excuse for a parent not to be informed and not to be involved."
The partnership between the ESRB and the PTA has produced a comprehensive booklet for parents of school-aged children, which features in-depth explanation of games ratings, content descriptors, online play and tips on discussion topics through which parents can engage their children, Vance explained.
Harpe Domini, Bub and Vance also explained parental controls on current consoles - in particular, how the Xbox 360's Family Timer feature can help parents restrict what types of content can play on the console and for how long. The booklet offered through the initiative explains step-by-step how to set up such controls. They also discussed why online interaction cannot be rated by the ESRB - "It's user-generated content," Vance summarized - and recommended that parents supervise their children's friends list and maintain awareness of who they are playing with online, while at the same time noting positives: online play can be a good way for family members to stay in touch.
Harpe Domini had a refreshingly realistic assessment of the value of online play to some kids. "Players have built a social reality in the online world," she explained - and urged parents to watch for signs of cyber-bullying the same way they would observe signs of face-to-face bullying in their children.
A more sophisticated element of parental involvement beyond just glancing at ratings was the theme of the webcast. "Most parents understand that it's their job to teach their children the ABCs, how to tie shoes or ride a bike. But it's just as much parents' responsibility to make sure that their children are consuming media that is appropriate based on their age and maturity level," said Harpe Domini.
"Every family is different; we don't make assumptions about what's appropriate for you," Vance added.
According to the ESRB, research indicates that 9 out of 10 parents are aware of the ratings and 3/4ths regularly use them. But, Vance conceded, "there's always more we can do" about that 25 percent of parents who don't pay attention to the ratings of the games their children play. She added that she hopes the initiative with the PTA will knock out those last few from the statistics.
During the webcast, audience members could answer poll questions that popped up. Only 51 percent of the audience responded that they always check game ratings; 10 percent said they never check. When it comes to parental controls, 50 percent responded that they had never set any up. 44 percent of parents monitor their kids' online play, 44 percent claim their kids do not play any games online, and 10 percent don't monitor at all.
Altogether, the team webcast went quite a bit beyond the usual degree of information and encouragement available from the already-forthcoming ESRB. Numerous times, the panellists stressed open communication and participatory dialogue between parents and children.
Harpe Domini added that, despite the priority of safety, "Parents should make sure kids aren't scared about these kinds of conversations. We don't want children to be frightened of different types of media." Parents should talk to kids, she urged, listen to their concerns and leave communication lines open on any topic.
In other words, concluded host Alex Goldfayn, "Parenting video games is exactly the same as parenting everything else."

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
kidnicky
Posted 11:34 AM 24/4/08
It's absolutely disgusting that something like this would even be discussed in 2008. "online interaction isn't rated because it's user generated"-yeah,no shit.
If you want to see what a game is like,look at the box-no shit.
Video games have been around since the seventies for Christ's sake. If you still have no idea video games have a "rating" in the form of a "letter" so you can see what's "age appropriate" you deserve to have to bail your kid out of jail.
Not that I think violent games make kids violent,but if you're that fucking ignorant of the world around you,if you're that much of a dinosaur zombie,then no doubt you're pretty ignorant of the rest of your kid's life.
kidnicky
Thorax
Posted 11:32 AM 24/4/08
Thank you ESRB, the flyer said it all on its own
Thorax
CanaryWundaboy
Posted 11:29 AM 24/4/08
I like this, maybe the industry over here in the UK could try something similar...
CanaryWundaboy
splines
Posted 11:23 AM 24/4/08
I'm glad the ESRB is still trying to get the average age statistic out there.
The sooner parents and the media stop thinking that only kids play games, the sooner I don't have to watch my games get censored (or banned) because 'of the children'.
splines
antialias02
Posted 11:13 AM 24/4/08
@Siegeman: If I recall correctly, Gamestop associates who don't card for M games can get fired, GTA or not.
antialias02
Siegeman
Posted 11:09 AM 24/4/08
I think Gamestop is ratcheting up for GTA as well, based solely on the fact that I got carded trying to buy Geist for the Gamecube. (M rated ... waste of $8)
Then again, the store was actually clean, well organized and the employees were super helpful. Perhaps the ID check was as much of a fluke as the rest of my shopping experience. I mean, a store in a small New Hampshire town shouldn't be better kept than ones in every major metropolitan area I visited, right? Right? *sigh*
Siegeman
ZinkO: The Game (the kind you just lost)
Posted 11:07 AM 24/4/08
WOW, that picture is creepy.
Props, ESRB. Nice to see some proactive...ness? Proactivity? Proactivization?
ZinkO: The Game (the kind you just lost)
hikergirl
Posted 11:05 AM 24/4/08
It's awesome that they are being proactive with the information.
I remember shopping with my sister and I was showing her some kids games and she asked me what the 'E' meant on the box. My sister is a terrific parent, but I think when a parent is not a gamer, that sort of thing isn't in the forefront of their minds. To have an organization like the PTA bring it to the forefront in a very positive way is fantastic.
hikergirl
Eclectified
Posted 11:03 AM 24/4/08
This is a refreshing thing to see.
As far as, 'why, every time a GTA game comes out?' Simply because, kids LOVE the forbidden fruit that is GTA. This is the game that kids beg their parents for and, for the most part, parents tend to swipe their credit cards first and ask questions later.
Eclectified
Miksho
Posted 11:01 AM 24/4/08
I think the most telling part of this article was simply in the numbers. Half of them don't regularly check ratings? 44 percent of them are COMPLETELY sure that their children don't play anything online? It's this strange mix of aggressive ignorance and naivete that has created the current view of gaming in the eyes of the mass media.
Way to go, ESRB. While the European rating system has been given a 2-year deadline to shape up, North America is taking a proactive step against the shitstorm that will inevitably follow the GTA IV launch.
Goddamn, though. Half don't regularly check. They should have asked how many of them check the rating of the movies their children watch. There seems to be a conflicting message, though; they say that games are not aimed at children, but then show that the majority of games are rated E 10+. That's true, because there's lots of licensed children's shovelware. I would be interested to see the ESRB ratings for the most bought/rented/played games of the past year, because it's not like the kids are going after stinkers; children being corrupted by GTA didn't become a problem until the series started printing money.
Miksho
Mr.SithNinja
Posted 10:56 AM 24/4/08
@ShaggE: Well said. I am surprised that the ESRB is out in front of this one.
-----------------------------------
I think we need a pre-emptive strike on Canada. They have been quiet for far too long.....they are planning something.....
Mr.SithNinja
truhuman
Posted 10:56 AM 24/4/08
I don't think parents pay as much attention to the ratings as they say they do. It's good that many do and that ESRB teamed up with the PTA to finally tell parents, it's your job!
I have a little brother at home and I would have to educate my parents all the time on some of the games he was playing. I think they do a much better job now.
Great job ESRB/PTA and nice report Leigh.
truhuman
TONYWONDER
Posted 10:54 AM 24/4/08
It's just scape goat for bad parents. All it really does is help market the game more.
TONYWONDER
Mr.SithNinja
Posted 10:54 AM 24/4/08
@caffolote: Because it is GTA.
Mr.SithNinja
ShaggE
Posted 10:53 AM 24/4/08
Y'know, it's funny. The ESRB have a similar goal to that of Jack Thompson. If only Jack had approached his cause in the way that the ESRB do, instead of spewing lies and chasing ambulances, he'd be our ally instead of our scapegoat.
ShaggE
Huckleberry
Posted 10:50 AM 24/4/08
This is definitely a good thing, I just have to wonder how many will take notice. Parents generally don't like taking the blame for things, and so the ESRB has a difficult job of basically reprimanding parents and saying "do better."
It's so much easier to just simultaneously blame "society" for every problem and expect society to clean it all up, right?
It would be great if they could just come out and said it simply and firmly: "Parents, it's your job to watch what your kid does. Your child is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY."
But that R word... it's scary for so many.
Huckleberry
peAr_nectAr
Posted 10:49 AM 24/4/08
"Parenting video games is exactly the same as parenting everything else."
This is more refreshing than a Zima. Major props to the ESRB and PTA. Thank you for opening up this dialog to people who may not be aware.
peAr_nectAr
Jac21
Posted 10:48 AM 24/4/08
Damn Kotau, rolling out the investigative press again.
Jac21
caffolote
Posted 10:47 AM 24/4/08
Why is GTA always a target every time a new GTA game releases?
caffolote
StealthMaster86
Posted 12:20 PM 24/4/08
I like it when Smart people do smart things.
I hate it when Smart people do stupid things.
This one is smart...
StealthMaster86
squidboy007
Posted 12:17 PM 24/4/08
woo! thanks for clearing up the myth that all games are for kids, esrb.
squidboy007
dowingba
Posted 11:57 AM 24/4/08
And we can all look forward to a day when those uninformed realize that everything we see in GTA games we already see in similarly rated movies and nobody gives two shits about those movies. (And those similarly rated movies are allowed to have nudity, on top of that!)
dowingba
Grimmjow Jeagerjaques
Posted 11:56 AM 24/4/08
Hilary clinton hates GTA
Hilary Clinton Enemy to gamers.
Hilary Clinton made an idiot out of herself(anybody watched WWE RAW, "Call me HilRod"...man I couldn't stop laughing)
Grimmjow Jeagerjaques
dead_red_eyes
Posted 11:53 AM 24/4/08
@VitFer2007:
Indeed, which A LOT of parents are severely lacking these days.
dead_red_eyes
VitFer2007
Posted 11:45 AM 24/4/08
If the ESRB gets attacked again even though they pulled off this informational event, then the accusers are missing something vitally important... something called common sense.
VitFer2007
Filthy_O_Bedlam
Posted 11:35 AM 24/4/08
Wow, the ESRB just stepped up. The lack of fear-mongering is quite refreshing.
Cheers, Filthy
Filthy_O_Bedlam
jello44
Posted 12:45 PM 24/4/08
@jello44:
God.. another issue of "read before you hit submit"
What I should have said was, any parent that buys Grand Theft Auto for their 12 year old child should be slapped.
jello44
jello44
Posted 12:44 PM 24/4/08
Any parent that buys a game titled "Grand Theft Auto" needs to be pimp slapped for their idiocy. What do they think that the object of the game is, planting flowers?
jello44
wild homes
Posted 12:42 PM 24/4/08
@kidnicky: I just really don't comprehend the aggressively defensive postures a lot of our community takes when stuff like this comes up. It's not too hard to think of situations where things like this could be really useful to parents. What about a parent who works two jobs and can't put in the hours being as hands-on as he or she might want-- wouldn't the ESRB's efforts benefit that parent, and that child? Or my own father, for example-- my father is forty-five years older than I am, and fifty-seven years older than my teenage brother. Gaming isn't something he gets on the level we do-- it's definitely not in his comfort zone. I'm really glad the ESRB is trying to put out this information, because even if you or I might not have use of it, someone might.
does it generally make sense to protest something that doesn't hurt you, and potentialy help someone else?
wild homes
wild homes
Posted 12:52 PM 24/4/08
PS I am really disappointed Rockstar, or Take-Two, I guess, didn't join the ESRB on this. I guess you could argue that because this push isn't EXPRESSLY about Grand Theft Auto, they couldn't be made to participate, but I would've had a lot more respect for them if they had willingly done so.
But money from all corners, I guess. Even if it comes from little kids. And I'm not trying to single out Take-Two, or Rockstar-- I think all developers should be more active trying to help our community grow in a healthy way.
wild homes
sohpi
Posted 1:30 PM 24/4/08
I hadn't really thought of it before, but maybe releasing a GTA game right before a presidential election is a bad idea. Here's to hoping the candidates have bigger fish to fry!
sohpi
MattB
Posted 1:29 PM 24/4/08
"'Every family is different; we don't make assumptions about what's appropriate for you' Vance added."
I certainly approve of that sentiment. I'd never like to see the day where ratings are any more than simply helpful information for parents. I personally have no problem with certain things a ratings group may find objectionable, but equally I have problems with certain issues they may not. We don't prevent everyone from driving just because there's a risk of getting into an accident. Freedom of the mind brings with it risk and responsibility, and if we value it at all then we cannot simply brush the issues under the carpet using bans or other censorship.
MattB
dunetiger : the mekuri master
Posted 3:24 PM 24/4/08
There are three major ways to reach people, and unfortunately, webcasts aren't it. Many of the people who are part of the percentage that don't check or don't know about ratings don't even know what a webcast is.
To reach people, you gotta hit three things: radio, tv, and newspapers. Unfortunately, it costs money, but if the gov't is seeing fit to spend so much money paying so many senators to debate on entertainment for weeks on end, perhaps the gov't might help the ESRB be heard. Throw ads in the Times, or spots between segments of Walker Texas Ranger (or JAG... or Perry Mason...). Do an informative bit on talk radio.
It's totally wonderful that they are trying to be heard and they most definitely need to be heard. I'd honestly donate to a campaign to raise funds for taking the steps above. I really would. Gaming is, natch, my favorite hobby and I hardly watch TV anymore. I'd really like to contribute to the effort of protecting something I love dearly. Even though I'm in Canada, what happens in the US affects us, too.
Hell, maybe even Croal can help us out. We're not all psycho killers.
dunetiger : the mekuri master
Snake726
Posted 4:01 PM 24/4/08
Mark me impressed.
Snake726
PK2
Posted 7:04 PM 24/4/08
Congratulations, ESRB. You've done a truly good thing, now only if you can get the message out everywhere about it.
As a Teenager of 15, I remember when my friend obsessed over GTA3 and Vice City. I just sat there and rolled my eyes. By San Andreas, he hated his parents because they realised what was RIGHT. I laughed on the inside, while I settled down to play excellent stuff that was appropriate for my age group like Legend Of Zelda. Hey, I came out right, I like to think.
PK2
StartRunning
Posted 8:53 PM 24/4/08
Gasp!
Slap me around with perfectly acceptable and justifiable reasoning, will you?
Kudos.
I sense something, as if a million gamers just sighed out in relief and untensed their shoulders that tiny little bit.
StartRunning
kidnicky
Posted 9:52 PM 24/4/08
@wild homes:
Looking at a box for five minutes is outside his comfort zone? Seriously,how long does it take and how knowledgable must you be to look at the cover of Saint's Row,look at the cover of Sonic the Hedgehog,and go "hmmmmm,difference."
kidnicky
Wei
Posted 11:30 PM 24/4/08
@ShaggE: They don't have the same goals at all! The ESRB is trying to educate and inform so parents can decide if a game is appropriate, JT wants to scare parents into not allowing the games' creation or sale.
Go ESRB, that last line about responsibility should be a billboard
Wei
kftgr
Posted 4:49 AM 25/4/08
Great detailed article, Leigh.
The ESRB should have pushed partnering with the PTA a long time ago. PTA parents are already more involved with their children, so this is doubly effective. Also, PTA parents are also more vocal, so keeping this vocal group knowledgeable and way less prone to jumping to ignorant conclusions about games is a great move.
kftgr
wild homes
Posted 4:26 AM 25/4/08
@kidnicky: No offense, but I think you're missing my point. I'm not saying my father is unintelligent, but I believe he is largely unaware of how our industry and community continue to evolve. It's just not on his radar. So, I think it really is valuable that the ESRB have decided to approach parents with a dialogue about this-- we can't always rely on having information AVAILABLE, sometimes it's necessary to say, hey, read this.
That's what they're doing. Nothing more than that. Should we as gamers feel threatened by the actions of a group that works on the part of our hobby? They're on your side!
wild homes
kidnicky
Posted 8:22 AM 25/4/08
@wild homes:
I'm not threatened,it's just silly. Does your Dad have a TV? It's almost impossible for him or anyone else to not know vidja gaims make the chitlens kill each other. It's a pretty popular issue. If it's "off your radar" your radar may not be wide enough. Especially if your kids spend a lot of time playing the very games you never think about!
(and no,I'm not insulting your dad,I'm continuing your hypothetical example)
kidnicky