Activision Blizzard Merger Official
Activision has officially received shareholder approval for its merger with Vivendi. The company said over 92 percent of its shareholders greenlighted the merger, and the transaction is expected to officially close tomorrow.
The merger was first announced in December of 2007, but has just now been finalised. Through it, Blizzard and Sierra parent Vivendi becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision, scoring 295.3 new shares of Activision stock. It'll also buy 62.9 million new shares for a total of $US 1.7 billion - the result is that Vivendi owns a stake of about 52 percent in its new parent company.
Santa Monica-based Activision's new name will officially be Activision Blizzard, a moniker change also approved by the shareholders today, but it'll continue to trade on the NASDAQ under its same symbol, ATVI.
Full details after the jump.
Activision Stockholders Approve Combination with Vivendi Games
SANTA MONICA, Calif., Jul 08, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) — Activision, Inc. (Nasdaq: ATVI) today announced that, at a special meeting of stockholders held earlier today, it received the stockholder approval necessary to consummate the company's agreement with Vivendi, S.A. to combine Vivendi Games, Vivendi's interactive entertainment business, with Activision's businesses. All of the proposals required to effect the transaction received more than 92 percent of the shares voted. The transaction is expected to close on or around July 9, 2008.
Activision and Vivendi Games will combine their businesses through the merger of a newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision with and into Vivendi Games. As a result of the merger, Vivendi Games, the parent company of Blizzard Entertainment and Sierra, will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision. Vivendi will receive approximately 295.3 million newly issued shares of Activision common stock. Concurrently with the merger, Vivendi will purchase approximately 62.9 million newly issued shares of Activision common stock at a price of $27.50 per share for a total of approximately $1.7 billion in cash, resulting in a total Vivendi ownership stake in Activision Blizzard of approximately 52% on a fully diluted basis and approximately 54% of shares outstanding. As of the closing of the transaction, Activision will be renamed Activision Blizzard and will continue to operate as a public company traded on NASDAQ under the ticker ATVI.
Headquartered in Santa Monica, California, Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a worldwide pure-play online and console game publisher with leading market positions across all categories of the rapidly growing interactive entertainment software industry.
Activision Blizzard maintains operations in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Sweden, Spain, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Romania, Australia, Chile, India, Japan China, the region of Taiwan and South Korea. More information about Activision Blizzard and its products can be found on the company's website, www.activisionblizzard.com.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements: Information in this press release that involves Activision Blizzard's expectations, plans, intentions or strategies regarding the future are forward-looking statements that are not facts and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In this release, they are identified by references to dates after the date of this release and words such as "outlook", "will," "remains," "to be," "plans," "believes", "may", "expects," "intends," and similar expressions. Factors that could cause Activision Blizzard's actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements set forth in this release include, but are not limited to, sales of Activision Blizzard's titles in its fiscal year 2009, shifts in consumer spending trends, the seasonal and cyclical nature of the interactive game market, Activision Blizzard's ability to predict consumer preferences among competing hardware platforms (including next-generation hardware), declines in software pricing, product returns and price protection, product delays, retail acceptance of Activision Blizzard's products, adoption rate and availability of new hardware and related software, industry competition, rapid changes in technology and industry standards, protection of proprietary rights, maintenance of relationships with key personnel, customers, vendors and third-party developers, domestic and international economic, financial and political conditions, foreign exchange rates, integration of recent acquisitions and the identification of suitable future acquisition opportunities, , the Activision Blizzard's success in integrating the operations of Activision and Vivendi Games in a timely manner, or at all, and the combined company's ability to realise the anticipated benefits and synergies of the transaction to the extent, or in the timeframe, anticipated. Other such factors include the further implementation, acceptance and effectiveness of the remedial measures recommended or adopted by the special sub-committee of independent directors established in July 2006 to review historical stock option granting practices by Activision Blizzard and its board of directors, the finalization of the tentative settlement of the SEC's formal investigation and final court approval of the proposed settlement of the derivative litigation filed in July 2006 against certain current and former directors and officers of Activision Blizzard relating to Activision Blizzard's stock option granting practices, and the possibility that additional claims and proceedings will be commenced, including additional action by the SEC and/or other regulatory agencies, and other litigation unrelated to stock option granting practices and any additional risk factors identified in Activision Blizzard's most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and the definitive proxy statement filed on June 6, 2008 in connection with the proposed transaction with Vivendi. The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon information available to Activision Blizzard as of the date of this release, and Activision Blizzard assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements believed to be true when made may ultimately prove to be incorrect. These statements are not guarantees of the future performance of Activision Blizzard and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond its control and may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.



View: AU Comments (0) | US Comments (67 comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this entry.
@Diesel_Power:
They developed Pitfall! and Mechwarrior 2 back in the day, but Activision is primarily a publisher now. They don't really develop games, but their acquired development shops do. Like Infinity Ward, which was acquired in 2003...
@mrantimatter:
Vivendi S.A. gives their Vivendi Games division to Activision in return for 52% of their outstanding stock. Vivendi Games becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision while Viviendi S.A. becomes the majority shareholder of Activision.
@wild homes is being recast!:
I really don't think Activision is going to mess with Blizzard. Activision only derives 5% of their overall revenue from publishing on the PC (vs 73% from publishing on the console) whereas Blizzard is exclusively PC.
I imagine the relationship to be very much like Take-Two and Rockstar. Rockstar remains a relatively independent in-house developer and Take-Two gets to publish and distribute all their monster hits. Take-Two pushes Rockstar to get games out on time, but as we saw in GTA IV's April release, Rockstar is loathe to release a game until it is ready (ports of Bully notwithstanding).
As exeprime, glibby, ScytheRexx and some other analytical Kotakuites have said, this merger makes strategic sense. Vivendi S.A. gets exposure to Activision's lucrative publishing and distribution business (a full buyout likely being out of the question due to the French/US regulatory approval) while Activision gains exclusive publishing rights to Sierra and Blizzard's catalog. In addition, this deal allows Activision to operate nearly as independently as before while making a takeover from, say, EA pretty much impossible.
jgw
Blizzardy-vision? anyhow i dont really care as long the game quality doesnt change
chozo_hybrid
I love how in every single post about the merger people come up with new ways to combine Activision, Blizzard, and sometimes Vivendi.
Activiblizzivendivisard for life!
Crawl to China
Blactivizzard!
See what I did thar'?
Herabec
To people worrying about developers leaving Blizzard - well, truth is Blizz never was a "developer-dependent" company - lots of people left blizzard over time (Bill Roper, anyone?) and yet the company is doing better than ever.
Their strength comes from the extremely healthy corporate culture (the "when it's done" syndrome, par example), and awesome marketing team - as an economics graduate and advertising worker, I consider Blizzard one of the best examples of marketing done right - every product shaped perfectly to satisfy their fans, every decision made for them, rather than simply "for money", and excellent promotion - just remember the way the all gaming news sites were filled with speculation the days before the Worldwide Invitational. You just can't buy that kind of publicity via simple advertising.
I doubt anyone will dare to meddle with such a healthy organization, and risk spoiling its incredibly successful identity and culture. Everybody trusts Blizzard blindly now, but it only takes one failure to spoil all that, and then all those people begging Blizzard to take their money would suddenly vanish in a puff of smoke.
I hope, and I believe, that the Activision execs will know better. Contrary to what most people believe, if you're in a leading position at such a successful company, chances are you're a pretty smart guy. So Activision, be smart! Don't dare touch Blizzard.
exeprime
i wish this whole merger never happened.
i would hate to see older blizzard games start making it onto the 360 and PS3. that would be terrible.
and as for activision. i think theyre a horrible company. i agree with whoever said that all thats going to happen is that blizzard games are going to be made faster and then stupid spin-offs will be made.
lazerdogz
Regarding the Vivendi/Sierra business, does this mean we may see a Homeworld 3 someday?
newgalactic
The internal structure is such that Activision and Blizzard are peers (hence the name, as well). Activision has no direct control over Blizzard decisions, and the only places they relate are in shared resources like marketing and possibly HR or administrative functions.
Anguirel
Yay! Still hasn't effected ground level grunts like me... Yet.
Supposedly things are set to change around the end of the month... ... ... If I had stock options I'd be excited.
art_zombie
@glibby: "who, other than gamers has heard of diablo?".
Only reason titles like GTA (manhunt and carmageddon) have so much publicity is because of the questionable content. The diablo base is massave, like all blizzard franchises whether joe idiot knows it or not at release even without any promotion at all they will sell millions of copies.
Crankyhobo
@ScytheRexx: Trust me its no use, ive been trying to tell that to people but they just ignore it and post their own "omgz Blizzard are gonna have to do what activision tellzzz them 2 doo!" The Merger name is purely for stockholders. in reality the merger is between vivendi owning activision.
BryanGuitarDude
@ScytheRexx: The same reason you never saw 'Vivendi games' on anything is also part of the reason for the sale/merger. Vivendi is a giant french media holding company; they don't know much about games. They acquired a few studios and some did well, but some didn't; they found they didn't know how to really manage these assets. So they turned to one of the oldest publishing/managing conglomerates out there, and told Activision to run it for them, but to keep sending them money.
Activision will now be publishing Blizzard's games (handling promotion, review copies, press junkets, tradeshows etc) but they will still be under blizz's name. Activision has a reputation as a fairly hands-off developer at the studio-level, as did vivendi. It's quite likely that this merger will only be good for most of the old vivendi holdings like Blizzard. Better visibility to the general public (who, other than gamers has heard of diablo? now what about grand theft auto?).
glibby
Here's to hoping Blizzard does what Blizzard wants to do after this merger. I'm not as optimistic as others, for better or worse.
When an Activision CEO announces during a conference call about the merger with Blizzard that "You can expect virtually every one of these properties will be exploited on an annual, or close to annual basis", it does not make me hopeful.
[www.penny-arcade.com]
I'll count myself as a skeptic until I see how the games turn out. I do look forward to SCII, though.
pastepunkjames
Don't freak out everyone.
Vivendi owns majority stock, Vivendi for years has made sure Blizzard has more autonomy then most game companies get these days, like the fact Blizzard is still the sole publisher of its own games (Why you never see "Vivendi Games" anywhere on a Blizzard box).
Blizzard themselves said that this merger would not in any way change the day to day business at the Blizzard Campus. You will not be seeing a major exodus of developers.
ScytheRexx
Actard.
Snake726
I wanted "Blactivision"
Nside
anybody else have a really bad feeling about this.
I mean honestly.
I have a literal pit in my stomach right now.
djjazzyjoe
So does that mean whenever we buy a Guitar Hero game from now on it will say "Activision/Blizzard" on the front? That's interesting.
kylo4
As long as Vivendi names itself whatever (Actiblizzard), and merges with whomever, and as long as they leave "the" Blizzard to do its thing like its been doing for a couple of deckades - I couldn't care less.
Ferraris are still Ferraris, even tho they're owned by Fiat; If you get my drift...
bakakensai
"...and the seventh angel poured out his bowl into the air...It is Done!"
Armageddon begins now.
Its a waste to port D3 to consoles. Rather, Blizzard and Activision should clash heads for the ultimate FPS hybrids, which I am sure is going in the behind the scenes.
PsycheE
:'( NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
please someone tell me this isn't the end of blizzard as we know it... every game with the blizzard log ois A+, is this about to change? :(
chorx
I think "Blizzard Activision" would've been more appropriate.
Shhteve
So how long until some of the great minds at Blizzard jump ship and start a new studio?
Caseus
@wild homes gets retconned!:
I think most of the people think that Activision will indeed force Blizzard to release Diablo 3 on the consoles.
We'll know soon I guess. Though it wouldn't surprise me if Blizzard already anticipated this and had a stipulation for their IPs and whatnot.
excaliburps
@Diesel_Power: is that not the point of this merger? a good publisher + a wicked developer = EA killer.
cong
I remember hearing Activision will have nothing to do with Blizzard's company and how it runs. I think Activision can't force Blizzard to make new games or release ones early, nor would it be smart.
Kaljin
Doesnt this really only mean that vivendi owns blizzard and activision but that blizz and act are still seperate and not actually working together?
BryanGuitarDude
@Jas49: Normally I think you'd be right, but I don't think Blizzard is going to assert itself. That just doesn't seem in their character. They seem to be almost qualified by a certain reluctance to be a fiscal monstrosity-- the very thing Activision seems to hunger for.
wild homes gets retconned!
Honestly, I think "Blizzard-Activision" is better phonetically. But maybe they were worried that Blizzard would be seen as an attributive noun.
HfAsianInvasion
The good thing is that Activision do not abandon Wii unlike a certain company (coughHarmonixcough), so I guess Wii player (like MII!) may rejoice at some kind of Diablo III coming to Wii.
Jestersage
How about Actard?
SomethingWired
@wild homes gets retconned!:
Whoever makes the biggest bankroll will wear the pants in this family.
Jas49
oh christ.... then end of blizzard.
shade-black
BUY BUY BUY
Oban
ummmmmmm............cool?
seriously though activision has been a crap factory for years now, hope blizz knows what they're doing.
PATSCRU
Bleh. Activision Blizzard is so bland. I was really hoping for something like Blizavision. Oh well, I'm really looking forward to playing Diablo Hero: Legends of Tristram.
neuralien
"...scoring 295.3 new shares of Activision stock"
How does one own 3/10 of a share?
greatslack
@mrantimatter:
Kotaku's summary "...Vivendi owns a stake of about 52 percent in its new parent company." is a bit misleading; Vivendi S.A. is the majority shareholder of Activision Blizzard, Vivendi Games is now a part of Activision Blizzard.
Highlander Wolf
@Tonx: No way, if Blactivizzard were going to use a move, it'd be Monthly Recurring Debit Withdrawal.
Your bank account has been poisoned!
wild homes gets retconned!
@Tonx: Shit wait no... Blactivizzard sounds like a pokemon.
Blactivizzard used PayDay!
It's super effective!
Tonx
@Brian Crecente: Acti-Zard? Really? It sounds like a Japanese robot. An Acting Robot.
Actiblizzion is really good... but I prefer Blactivizzard.
Tonx
@QC8472: Yeah, I know some people are saying that Diablo III will be the big test-- arguably Blizzard's most console-friendly title, big name release, and so on-- but I think we're going to see these two vastly different idealogies butt heads quite a bit sooner than that. I'm thinking the first blows will come in less than a year, like you said. Cheers!
@AceSpeed: Yeah, it's a strange merger. The two companies don't really compliment each other's strengths at all, and definitely don't do anything to address the other's weaknesses-- whatever those may be perceived to be-- so I don't really know why this merger happened, other than Activision just really likes money.
wild homes gets retconned!
Activision isn't going to change. The only thing that could happen is Blizzard will be more pressured to push games out the door and come out with wacky spin offs.
Gamers have nothing to gain in this, only lose or water down one of PC gamings last bastions of quality gaming.
Mooglecharm
So wait: it takes 7 months to approve Activision/Blizzard, yet it has been almost a year and a half with nothing done on the XM/Sirius Satellite Radio merger!?!
Oh, I love how the American government lets money run things...
Phoenicks
Good. Now I have a solid reason for not building a computer to play SC2 and D3. I'd rather my money not support Activision, namely Kotick.
doubtful
Does this mean that Rock Band won't be getting any Level 80 Elite Tauren Chieftain?
Cerbo
The summary is confusing two different entities: Vivendi, and Vivendi Games. Vivendi sold Vivendi Games to Activision, in return for stock in the new company.
jaz
@wild homes gets retconned!: Indeed, it won't even be 6 months until we see who changes who.
Since it's Activision's CEO that takes over, I don't think blizzard will fare better with this merger.
QC8472
@mrantimatter: I'm my own grandpa
Helioz
wait...
"the result is that Vivendi owns a stake of about 52 percent in its new parent company. "
Unless I misundertsand the numbers, doesn't owning 52% of Activision mean that Vivendi owns that company? How can it be a paraent company if a child company owns it?
mrantimatter
Come on: Acti-Zard!
Brian Crecente
What amazing games has Activision made in the past? Guitar hero was made by Red Octane and COD4 was made by Infinity Ward.
Oh wait! Acitivision is nothing more but a leechy publisher where as Blizzard makes actual games.
Atleast EA makes games.
Diesel_Power
I laugh only because I am so very scared right now.
@Mit:
Agreed.
AndrewG009
@wild homes gets retconned!:
I agree with you 100% here. 'Nuff said.
AceSpeed
It won't be long until we start to see who wears the pants in this relationship. Considering Activision and Blizzard are at times very much at cross-purposes-- Activision whore out everything that isn't nailed down and Blizzard don't, Activision make sequels faster than humans reproduce while Blizzard prefer a long-tail approach, Activision leave no money on the table at all whereas Blizzard are content to leave franchises sitting for years until they feel it's right for the fans to get a new installment, Activision leave no platform unmolested while Blizzard famously support PCs exclusively even if it means they potentially ignore some revenue streams. Eventually, one company's characteristics are going to inform the other's habits-- enough that we can see it and note the occurrence.
I'm only hoping it's Blizzard changing Activision, and not the opposite.
wild homes gets retconned!
I'm still referring to them separately >_>
Have to wonder what the logo is gonna look like though.
Mit
I was really wishing for Actizard over Activision Blizzard. I do wonder if this means there will be a greater chance of Blizzard games coming to the 360 and PS3 though.
BlackIceJoe
Actiblizzion always had a nice ring to it.
Pezdispenser
Ahh, nothing like making a buyout look like a merger to allow company execs to be able to cash out their options! Everyone wins! Well as long as everyone is an executive with stock options.
endaround
*Anxiously awaits Warcraft: Aerosmith*
chuffhoncho
About damned time.
glibby
Lol @ Acti Lizard. SOunds like mutated lizard or sumthin.
McFazo
@Jtn:
Oooh, and their official mascot could be "Actizzard the Excessively-Profitable Dinosaur"
Nicolai
Yay. We can finally get Call of Diablo 5: Stars at War!!!
ninjadude14
I'm curious as to if this will change any plans for the Activision presser next Tuesday. I'm sure they'll mention the Blizzard merger - but will Blizzard's presence change the information detailed...?
Tonx
@Jtn: I agree 100% Activision Blizzard is so unimaginative. Active Lizard would've even been better :P
Lachoy
"Santa Monica-based Activision's new name will officially be Activision Blizzard"
Dammit, I wanted Blizzavision.
Jtn