<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kotaku Australia &#187; free radical design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/tags/free-radical-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gamer&#039;s Guide &#124; Computer and video game news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Star Wars: Battlefront III Might Have Looked Like</title>
		<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/12/what_star_wars_battlefront_iii_might_have_looked_like-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/12/what_star_wars_battlefront_iii_might_have_looked_like-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael McWhertor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free radical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free radical design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars battlefront iii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/12/what_star_wars_battlefront_iii_might_have_looked_like-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With Free Radical Design having effectively kicked the bucket, shedding most of its workforce and desperately seeking buyers, here come the leaks. We&#8217;ve already seen what Timesplitters 4 might have looked like&#8212;how about Battlefront III?


High poly-count renders and in-game meshes from the third Star Wars: Battlefront were leaked by one of Free Radical&#8217;s former animators, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/kotaku/2008/12/swbf3_leadin.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
<p>With Free Radical Design having effectively kicked the bucket, <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/12/free_radical_cuts_140_jobs_up_for_sale-2.html">shedding most of its workforce and desperately seeking buyers</a>, here come the leaks. We&#8217;ve already seen what <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/12/timesplitters_4_concept_art_drips_from_corpse_of_free_radical-2.html"><em>Timesplitters 4</em> might have looked like</a>&mdash;how about <em>Battlefront III</em>?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: gallery, free radical, free radical design, star wars, star wars: battlefront iii, top --><br />
<span id="more-320806"></span>
<p>High poly-count renders and in-game meshes from the third <em>Star Wars: Battlefront</em> were leaked by one of Free Radical&#8217;s former animators, revealing a partial look at who&#8217;s in the game and what they look like.</p>
<p>Appearances from <em>Star Wars</em> regulars like Han Solo, Chancellor Palpatine and the Jawas look to join newcomers like Shara the Bounty Hunter and the Kimanoans, the forgettable long-necked alien species from the similarly forgettable <em>Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones</em>.</p>
<p>The renders, via <a href="http://swbf3.de/">SWBF3.de</a> and the artist&#8217;s various web sites, are dated from the end of 2007, so much could have changed during that time period. Whether <em>Star Wars: Battlefront III</em> will change even further at its rumoured new home at Rebellion, remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/12/what_star_wars_battlefront_iii_might_have_looked_like-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anyone Want to Buy Free Radical?</title>
		<link>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/12/anyone_want_to_buy_free_radical-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/12/anyone_want_to_buy_free_radical-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Good</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disturbance in the workforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free radical design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timesplitters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/12/anyone_want_to_buy_free_radical-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
TimeSplitters developer Free Radical Design is now officially up for sale, providing the end-all verification to a set of rumours about the company about a week ago.


The word last week had Free Radical founder Steve Ellis setting up shop at a new studio, called Pumpkin Beach, taking with him some of his former company&#8217;s coders. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/kotaku/2008/12/custom_1229703515955_holo_gulch_hank_concept_01.jpg" /></p>
<p>TimeSplitters developer Free Radical Design is now officially up for sale, providing the end-all verification to a set of rumours about the company about a week ago.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: disturbance in the workforce, free radical design, timesplitters --><br />
<span id="more-320660"></span>
<p>The <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2008/12/free_radical_founder_sets_up_new_studio-2.html">word last week</a> had Free Radical founder Steve Ellis setting up shop at a new studio, called Pumpkin Beach, taking with him some of his former company&#8217;s coders. There was some question as to whether Free Radical was being shuttered, or simply in administration, and also how many others lost their jobs.</p>
<p>It is in fact in administration, which means the company and its assets are for sale. Presumably that would include IP like TimeSplitters, and presumably it means someone could buy it without buying the developer outright, although severe cost-cutting makes the latter more reasonable. As for jobs, 140 people are being let go at the beginning of the year. Forty remain.</p>
<p><a href="http://play.tm/news/22750/free-radical-put-up-for-sale-as-jobs-cut/">Free Radical Put Up for Sale as Jobs Cut</a> [Play.tm]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/12/anyone_want_to_buy_free_radical-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
