BioWare Says Games These Days Got No Consequences

Once was a time you said something, or did something in a game, and it mattered. Games were primitive, they were punitive. But these days? With 2/3 of the industry chasing dog suits and Dogz for a cheap buck and the other 1/3 falling back on quicksaves and 6-hour campaigns, things have got...lighter. Easier. More meaningless. Something BioWare have had enough of, co-founder Greg Zeschuk is saying:

As an attempt to appeal to a broader and broader audience, consequence has left gaming. Everything is very low impact and there's no real negative result that can occur. We're going to start bringing that back but in a rational way, a way that doesn't punish the player -- but puts them on the spot.

Please, do. My most defining memory of BioWare's Mass Effect was the Wrex showdown, think they worked consequence (without punishment) in there almost perfectly.

BioWare: Consequence Has Left Gaming, 'Star Wars' MMO Will Fix That [MTV]


Comments

    Sorry, I think some people are confusing tension with consequence. The real action/consequence in the Mass Effect Wrex showdown was:

    action - how you allocate your points in diplomacy.
    consequence - high diplomacy opens up talking options to save Wrex.

    That is action and consequence. In a game that is heavily driven by story that is a significant action with significant consequences (granted those actions still don't really impact the main story).

Join the discussion!