Let's try something a little different. While unscientific, I've long toyed with the idea of a tracking poll of our readership's posture over time on certain games.
And while this method of feedback is open to spamming, fanboy manipulation and all sorts of other bad behaviour, let's put it out there and see what happens. If it proves useless or gets abused, we'll end the feature.
Approval ratings are a concept most closely identified with, of course, politics, and how the governed feel about the job being done by their leaders. I'm not going to ask your opinion of publishers, as nearly everyone has some negative feeling toward them, but rather about games.
Kotaku Approval Ratings will examine, at at least attempt to, your mood about certain games prior to their release, immediately after their release and review, and then periodically thereafter.
Additionally, it will ask for the readership's long-term posture on some multiplayer games, exclusive (or with content exclusive) to certain platforms, and multiplatform singleplayer games, all roughly two years old or older.
Like the question "Do you approve of the job so-and-so is doing," this doesn't ask for anything deeper than a gamer's feeling about a title, either long established, or currently in the news. "Worth playing" is in the eye of the beholder, whether that means "still worth playing" for you, or "still worth playing" to others and the gaming public.
The results have been hidden from view to discourage voting for a specific result. I'll report the percentages next week when the tracking poll continues.
As certain games enter the news, or as certain trendlines become uninformative, other games will be rotated in and out.
Already then, time for the first Kotaku Approval Ratings polls. These polls will close in 24 hours 7:30 p.m. U.S. Mountain time, tomorrow.
For starters, your feelings about Wolfenstein:
And now, your feelings on some older games:
Thank you! These results will be reported next week, with another set of questions.