How Cover Shaped Gaming’s Last Decade

How Cover Shaped Gaming’s Last Decade

It’s January 2010. The last decade has drawn to a close, and more than anything else in the past 10 years, there is one single-player gameplay mechanic that has done more to revolutionise video games. That mechanic is “cover”.

Cover: cov-er

1a: to guard from attack b(1): to have within the range of one’s guns

Those are the first two entries in the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. In gaming, “cover” is hiding behind objects, and a cover system is a game mechanic in which the gunplay is built upon the idea of not getting hit. The point with a cover system is to shoot and avoid getting shot, not sneak and avoid getting caught.

Traditionally, first-and-third-person shooting games have allowed players the ability to run around a battlefield and pop off bullets – “run-n-gun”.

But run-n-gun is to a water gun fight as cover is to paintball. “It’s like in summertime, having a water gun fight with SuperSoakers,” explains Gears of War designer Cliff Bleszinski. “You don’t really care about getting hit and getting wet. But with paintball, the entire point is not to get hit, because it hurts.” That fear of pain translates to a fear of death in video games is the M.O. on which the cover system operates. In November 2006, the release of Gears of War did not invent the cover system – Bleszinski will be the first to admit that – but the game did spearhead a cover mechanic renaissance during the last decade.

While American developers churned out run-and-gun shooting game after run-and-gun shooting game, Japanese developers explored the cover mechanic in shooters. Koei, best known for the Dynasty Warrior hack-and-slash games, released third-person-shooter Winback for the Nintendo 64 in 1999. Players were Jean-Luc Cougar, a secret agent with Special Covert Action Team (SCAT), and out to take down a laser command centre. The game did not allow players to run-and-gun, instead forcing them to stop and shoot. Crates and corners provide cover for Jean-Luc to pop out from and fire his weapon. Namco, who developed Time Crisis, tried its hand at a cover-based third-person shooter with 2003’s Kill Switch. The cover system was the main draw and was featured in the game’s tagline: “Take Cover. Take Aim. Take Over.” Both game forced players to use the camera controls to look around the environment, giving more strategy to the games than simply running around firing a weapon.

When Epic Senior gameplay designer Lee Perry saw the cover system in Kill Switch, he thought it was a “breath of fresh air.” Epic was hard at work on the third-person-shooter that would become Gears of War. The game was missing something, and that was cover. Perry called Bleszinski into his office, showed him Kill Switch, and both agreed that this mechanic was exactly what their game needed. Shooters had become stale with players running around, hopping up and down like rabbits. “It drives me insane to see a character running at me in game with a gun,” says Bleszinski. Cover didn’t permit that. You do that, you get your head popped off.

But the idea of cover was risky. “There was still this very real fear that players didn’t want to play a defensive game,” says Perry. “Conventional wisdom was that they wanted to feel empowered and leap off a building into a crowd of 30 opponents.” Cover wasn’t about mauling your enemies en masse . It was about surgically killing them. And Kill Switch’s poor reception and lacklustre sales didn’t exactly inspire confidence for Epic. Bleszinski often talks about a “special sauce” that games need to become successful. The cover system was one importance ingredient in that sauce. “Had we not implemented a cover system,” says Lee, “I think we would have spun our wheels in many other attempts to find our magic.”

Developers began pushing the cover mechanic forward, advancing game development behind simply hiding behind something. Naughty Dog, the studio behind the Uncharted series, took cover in a completely, forgive the pun, uncharted direction. The point of reference for Naughty Dog was not little known Japanese console games, but Hollywood blockbusters. “Scavenging for weapons, running from whizzing bullets, and scrambling into cover as your only chance for survival simply had the right vibe for us, and were necessities if we were going to be true to the genre,” says Uncharted 2 game director Bruce Straley. “So cover-taking became the extension of an aesthetic desire first.” Straley puts simply – Problem: you’re being shot at. Solution: get into cover! Even though Uncharted has cover, Naughty Dog views the title as more of a run-n-game than a stop-n-pop game and uses cover and the enticement of cover to move players down the in-game map.

But what Gears of War is to the ground (it’s a very earthy title, with the enemy spawning from underground), Uncharted is to the sky (the game has hero Nathan Drake jump and swing from high places). In Uncharted 2, Naughty Dog aimed to bring cover to climbing. The game allows players to engage in combat whenever they were climbing, hanging or jumping. “This expanded our idea of what cover really meant in the Uncharted world,” points out Straley. “Suddenly, cover was a sign hanging off a lamp post, the ledge of building, or a window frame.” Cover no longer tied Uncharted to the ground. In a similar vain, Dark Void, released this January, implements a “virtual cover system” that literally turns the in-game world on its ear, providing new and unexpected cover for players.

Even though early cover game Time Crisis was a first-person shooter, cover has felt largely bound to third-person shooter titles. The reasons for this are obvious: Putting cover in third-person games frees up the camera. It is easier to judge space when you can see your character. Time Crisis is a rail-shooter: The path is already set in stone, and there is no freedom of the in-game camera. Players are popping out from behind cover to fire their weapons. Developers Treyarch and Guerilla Games both brought cover with their respective titles Quantum of Solace, released fall 2008, and Killzone 2, released February 2009.

Guerilla Games first implemented cover in its 2006 PSP game, Killzone: Liberation, which was released a month before Gears of War hit. But the title was a third-person shooter, and for Killzone 2, the developers wanted to keep as much as possible in the first-person as not to take players out of the moment. Initial efforts at shoehorning Killzone: Liberation’s third-person cover system into Killzone 2 were lukewarm at best. “Luckily one of our designers was convinced that a cover system like this was possible in first person and filmed some examples at home ducking and pop out behind his dining table,” says Guerrilla game director Mathijs de Jonge. A fully functional in-house test demo soon after proved cover could be added, and the final product allows players to blind fire over cover as well as lean-n-peak to shoot.


  • Soldier of Fortune had a nifty cover system way back when which allowed for some good shootouts. What Gears got right is the flowing movements, retreating, advancing and flanking,

  • Cover in games is a great idea and at least pays lip service to a sense of realism. All we need now is a wide open battlefield, guns to be substantially more lethal and AI to be intellient and we’ll have a chance at a real successor to operation flashpoint rather than the 2 crappy options we have now…

  • How come there’s no mention of Rainbow Six Vegas?
    That game came out around the same time as Gears Of War, and the cover system was superb.

      • i disagree. i want first person shooting/movement and third person cover. the reason i hate the whole cover idea is it has spawned the 3rd person shooter which are just annoying. i don’t mind 3rd person in cover because the player is not in the way of the action. rainbow six is still my favourite cover system.

        how can i get immersed in a game when my character is always in the way of the fricken action.

    • I too was supriseded that ranbow six: vegas wasn’t included, especialy around where he’s talking about it cover binding most games to 3rd person. The merging of 1st and 3rd person in vegas was superb and is probably my fave cover system to date.

  • What about Brothers In Arms: Hells Highway. That was basically ALL ABOUT cover. If you wern’t behind cover you were basically dead from one shot if the screen was red from warning. That was VERY realistic.

  • I also believe that the cover system in R6Vegas was the best cover system in an FPS that strangely hasn’t been replicated in any other FPS’s. After playing that game and then going back to the latest and greatest in FPS games feels like a step backwards. R6V cover system was superb and should be the benchmark for all FPS’s from here on in. Full Stop.

  • While I love Rainbow6 Vegas, I think we’re forgetting Full Spectrum Warrior here too. That game was superb and is probably one of the most realistic cover systems, simulating being pinned down and everything. After all, popping up while being shot at is viable in games, but not for humans.

    It remains one of my favourite games ever made and I can’t see why people hate it so much.

  • While i understand the gitst of the article is seems to be dedicated to a one button “stick” approch i just think its a rather loose idea. The serious use of cover has been around for ages. By serious i guess i mean cover you have to completely leave to target an enemy. The “lean left/right buttons” were the first major step as far as i can remember, if not the most easy to use (purely because the it needs a couple of buttons)

Log in to comment on this story!