Electronic Arts' "Project Ten Dollar" Isn't As Ominous As It Sounds

You may have noticed that in the past few months, EA has begun to provide content that's free to purchasers of new games, but costs serious money for those buying second-hand. It's no co-incidence. It's called "Project Ten Dollar".

As part of the company's attempts to combat the sale of pre-owned games - where profits go to the retailer, not the publisher - Electronic Arts boss John Riccitiello assembled his executives in New York City last year for a "brainstorming session". What they came up with was "Project Ten Dollar".

With a name that like that, I hope Riccitiello didn't just say "yeah, approved" or something equally dull. I hope he leaned back in his chair, pointed at a dossier and said "Men...commence Project Ten Dollar". Then took a drag of a cigarette, gazed out the window, and muttered "and may God help us all....."

Project Ten Dollar made its debut in Dragon Age and, more publicly, with Mass Effect 2's Cerberus Network, but you can expect to see it a lot more going forwards. I mean, it has a codename! You know a company is serious about a campaign when it's given a snappy codename.

With all of EA's 2011 titles to feature DLC of some kind, it'd be safe to assume that most of those games, if not all of them, will feature the same kind of system, whereby DLC that's free for purchasers of new games costs $US10 for anyone buying the game second-hand.

Electronic Arts: Lost in an Alien Landscape [BusinessWeek]


Comments

    Best strategy thus far and hard to believe it has been EA championing the idea.

    I think they need to take it further then just some optional extra content. It should like the ending or something equally significant is a free download for people who actually buy the game.
    This second-hand business hurts the industry more than piracy IMO.

      "This second-hand business hurts the industry more than piracy IMO."

      OH NOES MY PROFITS, THEY CANNOT RESELL THEIR WARES!

      I consider this an insult to gamers in general. I will happily go without this extra content for the sake of having the right to buy my games cheaper when such an option occurs and supporting companies that actually finish their games before releasing them.

      That would fail. horribly

      buying a game second hand is still a legit buy.

    I can honestly say this is a great idea, industry-wise at least.

    Why must they do this for PC releases as well? It's not like there's any second hand PC sales hurting the publisher. It just pisses us off when we have to install the game AND download the extra content. I buy my pc games retail so I don't have to use my bandwidth on downloading them (like I would with Steam)

    I imagine this would also combat game piracy somewhat.
    I think it's a great idea despite my seething hatred for ready-at-launch paid DLC.

Join the discussion!