Killzone 3 Hands-On: Bigger, Better, More 3D

Killzone developer Guerrilla Games and Sony showed off the first playable version of the PlayStation 3's next entry in the series, a Killzone that feels familiar, but much improved, a bigger world with smarter enemies. Oh, and stereoscopic 3D.

The playable demo, available in both 2D and 3D versions at Sony's Killzone 3 showing, started off with our futuristic squad of ISA soldiers approaching a Helghast oil rig planted in an alien arctic sea. The entry to the level known as "Frozen Shores" started aboard an ISA Intruder. After taking down that rig by shooting out its supports, our dropship suffered an unfortunate crash, with Killzone heroes Sev and Rico down but not out and ready to take down scores of glowing-eyed bad guys.

Killzone 3's enemies and gameplay may feel familiar, but its environments certainly don't. As I took down distant Helghast soldiers with a conveniently placed mini-gun, then switched back to the stock M-82 Assault Rifle, snow flakes whipped by, as did the frigid winds of Helghan's shores. Oh, and it did it all in dazzling, but distracting 3D.

Here's what else is new.

The WASP

The latest addition to the Killzone arsenal is the turret turned mobile missile launcher known as the WASP. This massive weapon launches an array of nine missiles at any unlucky Helghast target in less than a second.

There are two ways to deploy a cartridge of WASP missiles. The standard firing mode spews a rapid fire deployment of rounds almost as quickly as one can depress the R1 button. That barrage flies frantically at your target, so don't expect precision. It's good for clearing out a cluster of Helghast soldiers or whatever cover they're currently taking refuge behind. A quick tap of the R1 button will launch less than nine, if you so desire, but I was never able to fire less than three at a time.

The WASP also lets you paint a target, fire, and rain down the full nine at once on an individual unit in its alternate firing mode. The launch and the ensuing pummelling was almost instant, but Sony reps said the final firing rate of the weapon in will likely be slower.

Don't expect to see the WASP too often. It's super powerful, perhaps overcompensating, but with just nine rounds per cartridge and a standard ammo supply of three cartridges, expect to use the new weapon sparingly.

What WASP stands for, somewhat surprisingly, was one of those things that Sony "isn't talking about yet". That's right, this acronym is still to be revealed.

The Jet Pack

Perhaps the highest compliment one can pay Killzone 3's jet pack is that it feels like a natural addition, easy to control with a short learning curve about its behaviour. While wearing the jet pack, a tap and hold of the L1 button on the PlayStation 3 controller will give you a short boost, then offer a slow floating descent. The pack feels more initially responsive than its counterpart in Halo: Reach, for comparison's sake.

In the demo level we played, the jet pack came in handy for a quick climb of the Helghan oil rig and a series of hops across a cluster of ice floes between the rig and Helghast base. While wearing the pack, our character's primary weapon was a mounted machine gun, a more than capable option for dispatching Helghast.

My one minor complaint about the jet pack was its mix up of the control scheme. Normally, the L1 button performs a melee attack. That changes when wearing the pack, as L1 fires your jet boost.

The "Brutal Melee" System

Killzone 3's other big talking point of the night was its close quarters combat. Sony reps informed us that only the M-82 rifle was cued up with melee attacks at this stage, so we kept that gun handy. The up close and personal attacks on Helghast soldiers consisted largely of boots to the face, knives in the back and, most fitting of the brutal description, a knife stab into the glowing eye of our enemies. A twist and turn into the skull later, Helghast soldiers fell lifeless.

The melee system didn't feel tangibly different from hand-to-hand attacks from other first-person shooters and the eye-stabbing was clearly early. There was no visible damage to those Helghast soldiers' helmets, giving the attack a less realistic effect. Frankly, I preferred shooting them in the kneecaps to watch them crumple.

The 3D

Killzone 3's three-dimensional effects, while offering a believable depth and a visually impressive distinction, felt like a lot of games we've already played in 3D. At time's it's distracting, at others it offers a better impression of being there. At one point, it made me nauseated.

HUD items and your targeting reticule layer nicely, at the depth of the TV screen. Entering iron sights is sometimes clear, sometimes disorienting, but always offering a realistic perception of depth. Killzone 3's 3D effect carries with it much of the trappings of the technology - you're better playing centred, there's ghosting, lens shutter can be annoying, and it can sometimes add confusion to the frantic fire fights. As a demonstration of the capabilities of 3D, it's strong, but may not be the ideal way to play an entire campaign.

Fortunately, the 3D effects didn't appear to affect the game's frame rate, moving as smoothly as the 2D version. While the game may have suffered slightly for its 3D wow factor, there's plenty of time left in development for Guerrilla to tweak, improve and further impress us with Killzone 3's big visual trick.

Killzone 3 is currently planned for a release sometime next year on the PlayStation 3. While we wait, here's a whole mess of new media, sadly only viewable in 2D.


Comments

    3D is really only in this game to promote 3D on the PS3. Since Sony think Killzone is a flagship title - they add 3D to it. Gimmick and pointless, yes! Leave it to the movies... well the good movies anyway.

    I can really only imagine 3D games in such games as Super Mario Galaxy and the upcoming Tron. They would be great. Its something about space/colours and technology that 3D fits in with...

    And the jet-packs... ah c'mon! Seriously...

      I'm no fan of 3D (get back to me in a few years when you can do it without the stupid glasses, until then - no sale), but there's nothing at all wrong with them adding 3D to the game, as long as it's not mandatory which it obviously isn't.

      So what's the problem? If you don't like 3D, you can (and the vast majority will) play it in 2D from beginning to end.

      I agree 3D is a stupid gimmick, but as Braains points out - it won't affect you.

      Also, jetpacks were in Killzone: Liberation. Whether they re introduced it because of Reach, or because they wanted to, we can't know for sure (well, they did say its because they wanted to, but again, could be them covering up trying to hide copying. or they genuinely did so before jet packs were even announced. we'll never know.)

      But having said that, Killzone 3 is sounding good!

    graphics still brown and grey?

      Hey, That's how Killzone Rolls...
      But I'm still very excited :)

    All PS1,2 & 3 games are in 3D. What we are talking about is stereopsis. Seeing depth in your feild of view. My problem with current '3D' movies is the images don't look natural. I feel like I'm looking through a pair of binocular's. I've never seen a '3D' game so I don't know if they have that same 'bino' vision look.

Join the discussion!