Call Of Duty Black Ops Spoiler: Stuff Blows Up Impressively

Call of Duty: Black Ops benefits from a large screen. The bigger the screen the better, I learned last week. That is because Call of Duty games are giant acts and detonation.

We are no longer storming Normandy Beach in Call of Duty. We are no longer one of many against an overwhelming force. From what I saw of Black Ops, the transition of the franchise continues: We are the overwhelming force.

It all starts, as Brian Crecente wrote in his spring preview of Black Ops, with the player riding in the cockpit of an SR-71 Blackbird as it takes off and jets toward the roof of the atmosphere.

You're up there so that you can look all the way down, via a surveillance scope, to a snowy scene where you - in an instant - are now in control of a soldier, skulking in cover as an enemy patrol marches by. Call of Duty games run on a monster of a graphics engine that renders and lights the realistic settings with some of the closest to photorealistic detail I've seen in a game. That's likely the only way I can use "realistic" in a line about what Treyarch is doing in Black Ops, because their style of action is more Hollywood. The player's character doesn't crouch in the snow for long. Soon they are firing a crossbow, rappelling (with a first-person perspective of the cable dangling down their side as they slide), smashing through a window to take out some bad guys in dramatic slow-mo and... not realistic I said, tagging enemies with arrows that brand an enemy with a blinking green light a second before it blows him and his buddies around him up.

The big Black Ops showpiece of E3 2010 was the Payback mission, which has the player and a computer-controlled buddy stealing a Russian helicopter and then blitzing Vietnamese camps/bases/villages with hordes of rockets. The screenshot up top shows you the look. To get a sense of the pace and energy of the action, load up the one flight mission in Black Ops studio Treyarch's previous Call of Duty, World at War. Lots of stuff blows up, including enemy helicopters.

Treyarch chief Mark Lamia told me that the helicopter scene isn't the only bit of flight action in the game, but he didn't want to give anything else away. He assured me that the development team is going for high action, using the rich variety of locales and armament available to their Cold Wars late-'60s setting. He also gave an interesting hint at maybe a smarter type of Call of Duty game by mentioning that the trucks you can take out with a chopper in the helicopter level will, if destroyed, fail to deploy soldiers later in that level. That's a more dynamic flow of action than I expect from the series.

Lamia showed me a bit of one last level, as part of an effort to show how far the studio is going with a you-are-there focus on the men in Black Ops combat. The scene was Khe Sanh in Vietnam. All I got was an intro bit, a non-interactive Jeep ride that begins with a few characters taking a ride through an army base but turns into a too-close witnessing of an attack on the base. Bodies fly past the jeep, as does a wing of the plane. It was intense. It was big. It's spectacle. That's Call of Duty. And that's Black Ops, with Treyarch making this series as outrageous as it has ever been - as big-screen-worthy a game as I'd seen at E3.


    We got a group of mates together and played COD out on the farm on a 3metre projection screen with a sound-system cranked to 11 (no neighbours makes for fun gaming nights). I have to say, it is a totally different game played that way. People were yelling and screaming when air strikes came in, would panic when multiple explosions hit, the spectacle of it all became part of the gameplay when overwhelmed by the large screen and the wall of sound. It was a hell of a lot more fun, even if we played a lot more badly than we usually do.

    "and then blitzing Vietnamese camps/bases/VILLAGES with hordes of rockets."

    I, for one, find this appaling.

    Allowing players to recreate the genocidal acts of aggression perpetrated on North Vietnamese civilians is fucking abhorrent and the jounalist who wrote this piece should be ashamed of himself for failing to comment on it.

    It's not the journalists job to comment on it, leave that up to the ratings boards.
    It happened, no amount of cutting it out of a game is going to hide that.

      It's not? So games journalists should just be empty, press release regurgitating ciphers, incapable of commenting on the political inferences of the medium they report on, should they?

      Your view makes it abundantly clear why the games industry and the people who play them are not taken seriously.

      Yes, it happened, but that doesn't make it ok to reenact. If it was set in WWII and you played as a Nazi, blitzing Jews with hordes of nerve gas, would that be acceptable? And would such a description not be considered inappropriate?

      The population of Vietnam are still suffering because of the US invasion and allowing players to "blitz villages with hordes of rockets" is tasteless and offensive.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now