Who’s Claiming They Have The ‘Avatar’ Of 3D Video Games?

6 responses to “Who’s Claiming They Have The ‘Avatar’ Of 3D Video Games?”

1. 

   Sergei

   January 14, 2011 at 11:06 am

   I find it weird how everyone ignores the fact that stereoscopic 3D is possible on many old games such as Crysis and even CoD4 (on PC).

   Reply
   1. 

      James Mac

      January 14, 2011 at 2:18 pm

      It works on xbox too.

      Reply
2. 

   James Mac

   January 14, 2011 at 2:22 pm

   Aren’t everyones eyes trained for 3d?

   I know I’ve been seeing the real world in 3 dimensions for nearly 30 years now.

   Also, the comparison to Avatar just killed the interest I had in this game.
   An overhyped piece of overlong crap… in a medium a lot of people cannot see? Sounds awesome.

   Reply
   1. 

      Stephen Moore

      January 14, 2011 at 8:06 pm

      I’m guessing he means his eyes are trained for ‘3d on a 2d screen’.

      Being that it’s an illusion he’s helped re-invent.

      I heard him say that he thinks that the 3d improves the emotional response from the audience, as well as the visuals.

      A claim I am not so sure about..

      Reply
   2. 

      Joe Mama

      January 14, 2011 at 10:10 pm

      Spoilers: Avatar looked good, Crysis looks good.

      Reply
3. 

   Ty

   January 14, 2011 at 6:01 pm

   I really would rather play Crysis back in a forest, gotta say. Anyone else think the city environment is just an obvious attempt on Cryteam’s part to keep the environment complexity down, with lower-powered consoles like 360 and PS3 in mind?

   BTW, I had EDimensional glasses way back in 2001, played Clive Barker’s Undying with those things. I don’t know if it was made with sterescopic glasses in mind, but even back then the depth of that game was flawless. Other games like Quake 3, I simply couldn’t get to look good, but Undying was fantastic.

   Reply