Tax Breaks For Games Makers Are So Rich, Even Oil Companies Question Their Fairness

Tax Breaks For Games Makers Are So Rich, Even Oil Companies Question Their Fairness

The New York Times this morning published an extensive look at the system of tax incentives and breaks exploited by games makers, concluding that their write-offs to research and development costs satisfy the letter, but not the spirit, of 50-year-old tax policies that by now defy common sense.

Focusing almost exclusively on Electronic Arts, the Times details how the company’s R&D for its own games qualifies for tens of millions of dollars in savings under tax breaks created in eras when America was concerned about the Soviet threat and Japan’s rise in automobile manufacturing. By contrast, a pollution-reducing smokestack project begun by Union Carbide in 2009 did not qualify for such R&D savings.

It’s an eye-opening, outsider’s look at something we’ve reported on here and which the conventional wisdom among game enthusiasts holds to be a good thing — the government, rather than pillorying video games or regulating their content, acknowledging the industry’s merit with tax benefits.

Outside our bubble, video games are not viewed as some underdog sector, but a mature industry taking advantage of breaks that, in spirit, are meant for startup operations and risky ventures that deliver some public good. Oil companies, the Times notes, question why the government effectively subsidizes video games development. Further, in a crossover industry touching software development, entertainment and online retailing, game makers can take advantage of more tax breaks than companies like Netflix or Adobe. And the research and development deduction means costs for production of games are subsidized in ways the production of films are not.

That said, the Times notes that even EA’s competitors feel that the company is not as aggressive as other publishers in pursuing. EA’s top spokesman, Jeff Brown, said that not taking advantage of all tax breaks available is akin to “insisting on paying full price during a store sale.”

He has a point, but EA is not a passive participant in this. It has a personal shopper, if you will, finding these values in the former Clinton administration tax official who now directs the company’s tax strategy. And timely lobbying on EA’s part in 2004 helped qualify video games for a tax break on companies that export, a tax deduction that last year amounted to 9 per cent of the publisher’s production costs.

We are not tax analysts here, and have generally reported and reacted to government incentives for the industry as a good thing without questioning their fairness at large.

The absence of these benefits may not stagnate development because those most often claiming them have enormous capital in reserve. And if they did, how can one argue that an entertainment product supplies a public good on the level of cleaner energy or pharmaceutical research.

Ultimately, I buy EA’s rationale that, hey, it holds memberships in clubs that all offer a nice buffet, and the prudent thing to do is to take advantage of all of them. There’s no morality here, this is what any publicly traded company worth a damn does, and those who write the tax code know this. So if there’s any blame to assign, it’s to lawmakers, and the fear of losing jobs makes closing off existing tax breaks difficult.

Unless, however, shrewd politicians sieze on popular conception of video games as trivial entertainment products not worthy of taxpayer subsidies, and use them as an argumentative fulcrum to reform corporate tax code and make American industry pay a more fair share. Ironically, video games might then provide more public good as a political punching bag, rather than as an industry treated with the respect implied by government tax incentives.

Rich Tax Breaks Bolster Makers of Video Games [The New York Times]

(Associated Press photo)


  • I’m sorry but this is ridiculous. Patently ridiculous. Oil companies are complaining about the ‘cushy’ relationship videogame companies have with government–OIL COMPANIES. How many countries has the US invaded recently which just-so-happen to have rich oil deposits that the economy depends on? How many environmental catastrophes has EA caused that are effectively written off, blamed on someone else, and has now dropped off the front pages?

    If we want to talk subsidies, take a look at the agriculture industry. Ever wonder why EVERYTHING has some derivative of corn/corn syrup in it?

    The ridiculousness of this article just won’t stop.

    • The entire article is riddled with holes, and that oil company quote is crying out for citation.

      I particularly like how he hides all the contrary information on the second page, like the fact the most beneificial tax break games companies ‘take advantage off’ is related to executive shares and available to every publicly listed company, or that if the tax incentives are removed all the companies would likely relocate to Canada where the tax incentives for games companies are even better!

      Or best of all, the last paragraph where its vaguely mentioned movie companies get better tax breaks than games. Oh really? well I’ll take Deus Ex over Transformers Dark of the Moon any day of the year.

  • This comes as an enormous surprise. An Australian news site straight reports news that the US subsidises its games industry.

    Great job on covering the local angles. Fantastic analysis of how the Free Trade Agreement negotiated by John Howard’s government is affected by this. Incredibly accurate reportage of how the World Trade Organisation is investigating government subsidies to industry and whether they break any WTO rules.

    Kotaku – reporting on games news for the Australian reader? Hilarious idea.

    /sarcasm off.

  • What about the tax breaksfor the movie or television industries? They receive heavy subsidies as well so I don´t really understand why the article singles out the game industry.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!