See How Armored Core V’s Multiplayer Will Change Mech Multiplayer In This Video

7 responses to “See How Armored Core V’s Multiplayer Will Change Mech Multiplayer In This Video”

1. 

   Ynefel

   January 28, 2012 at 8:57 am

   This actually gave me goosebumps. Screw Hawken, this is true mecha. <3 Armored Core. <3 From.

   Also nice to see translation looks complete, so release couldn't be too far away, surely?

   Reply
2. 

   Riavan

   January 28, 2012 at 9:53 am

   Armoured core has always fallen through in the polished gameplay department for me, it just feels more like a cheesy game you’d play at the arcade back in the 90’s. I honestly prefer the mechs in lost planet to the mechs in armoured core.

   Reply
   1. 

      Ynefel

      January 28, 2012 at 11:26 am

      I think the finer points of AC’s piloting is lost on most people. Arcadey? Unless you play with a stock AC that hasn’t been tuned, or you’re not familiar with the piloting system, no way.

      AC is arcadey, and you prefer the mechs in Lost Planet? Wait, what? That’s like saying Gran Turismo 5 is too arcadey and you prefer the cars in Daytona USA.

      Reply
3. 

   PuppyLicks

   January 28, 2012 at 9:54 am

   Did I see a ‘Post Destruction Character’ option at the end there?
   Does that mean after your AC is destroyed that you’re on foot? Iiiiinteresting 🙂

   Reply
   1. 

      ICHIkatakuri

      February 1, 2012 at 6:41 pm

      Not just an on foot character, I’ve seen a video from the Japanese Demo and when the Mech popped it was replaced with a little man in a jet pack. It looked like the one on Pilotwings too 🙂

      I love this series but never found the MP as in depth as FROM Softwares other Mech game “Chromehounds”. With the territory holding aspect and team play in this iteration, I’m hoping they have brought back that addictive world conflict side too 🙂

      Reply
4. 

   Pariah

   January 28, 2012 at 10:19 am

   Definite buy for me..

   Reply
5. 

   Cap’n Crunch

   January 28, 2012 at 1:09 pm

   So much blur

   Reply