Sim City Requires Always On Connection, Designed 'Ground Up' For Multiplayer

In a recent interview with, producer Jason Haber discussed the upcoming Sim City. Apparently it requires an 'always on' connection and that's a direct response to the game being designed to deliver a multiplayer experience.

"Well, [Sim City] was built from the ground-up to be multiplayer," said Jason. "I think by having it be a multiplayer game, it allows you to specialise your city in a region and really have your influences affect other people who are playing in the region with you. Also by being always-on, we can save your game in the cloud so you can go and play it anywhere wherever you want. If your machine blows up, your game won’t be gone and you won’t have to start over! You know, in this day and age everyone’s connected all the time, so we felt like it was the perfect time and it would be fine to do that."

Everyone's connected all the time -- that's all well and good -- but what about drop outs?

"We do have some safeguards in the game," explained Jason. "If your internet connection drops, it can still sort of sit around for a while and recover and you can go back online. Glass Box can handle all of that. It’s basically a safety net for you; you won’t just lose everything if your connection goes down."

To be honest -- I don't like it. I disagree with always on connection and think it assumes far too much. I've been in situations where I've been without internet, and the last thing I need then are video games I can't play. That's when I need video games more than ever! What about the ability to play on a laptop? What about people in the armed forces? What about people who live in remote areas?

Nah, don't like it at all.

EA Maxis On DRM, Sheep And More In Sim City []


    Bloody always on connections...

    I really can't explain how much i can't stand them. Good thing i don't play nearly as much stuff on PC anymore.

      This shit has turned me off at least 10 games in the past few months, including Diablo 3. When I buy games, I buy longevity. What's the point in buying a game when its always online authentication server will eventually come offline and you won't even be able to play what you paid for?

    Yeah, I've accepted the fact I won't be playing this which is too bad. Good luck to them, though.

    Well, if you're focusing on multiplayer it'll be hard if it wasn't always on...;) I used to rageNOTBUYING but succumbed. It's not all that bad. I'm online 100% of the time anyway. If i'm not, i'm usually on the phone to my ISP quicksmart!

    To anyone who has a non-dial up internet connection and plays games on PC, this isn't really that much of a bother. It might have been 10 years ago, but today? Non-issue.

      It's true that most of us are on always-on broadband now, but there are the real issues of dropouts, playing on a laptop on a long train trip or at an airport, and then the latency introduced by having to upload everything you do to a server that is probably (at best) in California.

      Maybe for some in a magical land where there internet is not always dropping out. I'm with TPG in the city and every night I get drop outs where it can be out for 5 minutes. I have had to give up on sc2 because I can not always reconnect to a game in time. Sometimes the internet will not even reconnect for a couple of hours. Not to mention the fact I have a lot of friends who are renting and use mobile broadband. This is not a good thing for them either. But I guess they wouldn't play it anyway. Too bad if they wanted to give it a shot.

      Except for people with laptops. If I want to kill a couple of hours between classes at Uni, I'm not going to be able to play Sim City a all. This is a deal breaker for me, I was on the fence when it was just at startup check. But needing to be always online is not needed for anything other than an MMO.

    I give hackers 3 months to get around this always online crap, but this multiplayer concept could work

      They will have a crack for it day one. And after this news I will pirate rather than purchase.

        better solution, buy and use crack to bypass

          I don't see how that's a better solution. "Hey publisher, I don't like what you do! But here, take my money anyway."

            I agree with this, the best solution is not buy it. Buying it then cracking it is giving positive reinforcement to the bastards. They don't know you cracked it, and they will probably add your cracked download to the list of people they accuse to be ruining PC gaming.

    Damn, I was looking forward to this. Not so much anymore. This is one game I can say no to for the reason of always on internet connection.

    The game doesn't need multiplayer and I'd rather they just admit they want to protect their game from piracy rather then do the whole song and dance about how I can save into a cloud. I'm sure if my computer goes boom the last thing I care about is your stupid game.

    I remember a similar outrage when steam came out about having to have an internet connection to install HL2 and play it now days that's just the norm. I'm not a fan of always connected but im starting to accept it. As mark said give the crackers a few days not months and you will find that there will be a work around to always connect.

      but the thing is you dont need an internet connection to play HL2. you can play it without one and you can log in to steam without one aswell. you just cant take advantage of all the friends/groups etc

        Yes you do, even if you delect off-line mode for steam every now and again it will want log on and update.If your not connected it will say "steam off-line mode unavailable".

      Once-off online activation on installing the game is one thing.

      A rights check on starting the game is another.

      A requirement to be online the entire time you play the game is yet another.

    I don't wanna play with other people. If I did I'd go out and be social..... or something.

    I remember playing Simcity 4 and having to plonk down cities around the city I was building in order to get the perks of having neighbor cities, Seems like this multiplayer aspect is an extension of that, and a good extension in my opinion

    Still don't know if I will buy this I remember playing the original sim city on my Amiga500 no i'm not that old but yes I have been playing games from the 80's got my first computer when I was 2 :). I miss the simplicity that was SimCity and SimCity 2000

    Between always-on requirement and it being an EA title, it's off my radar. Shame, but c'est la vie.

    After all, they did such a good job with online activation in their last project, why shouldn't we trust them?

    For all the problems with always on, the thing that most bothers me about this is that they're making Sim City multiplayer at all. Sim City is the kind of game that I play when I want to have absolutely nothing to do with any other human being.

    Steam manages to handle having offline saved data and cloud saving, all it does is sync the next time you're online and ask you which one is correct. Heck, XBox Live profiles have been doing that ever since their conception. There really is no excuse to not have offline saving other than laziness and an excuse for justifying your always online DRM.

    You also can't play it "Anywhere, wherever you want" if where you are is a place that has no internet connection...

    "Also by being always-on, we can save your game in the cloud so you can go and play it anywhere wherever you want. If your machine blows up, your game won’t be gone and you won’t have to start over!"

    Until EA shuts down their servers 6 months after launch.

    I played the SNES Sim City to death but I haven't liked a single other one that's come out. I'm not seeing the multiplayer potential unless you just spam disasters on other peoples towns. Always online means I won't even bother to check it out.

    will the new simcity game beat the spore record of being the most pirated game of all time?
    we have to wait and see

    There is just something I just don't understand: Do they have any social market analysts? I mean these days ignoring the reaction of your userbase is frightfully dangerous, so should be making no attempt to predict their response. EA did that wrong with ME3, they had no idea how some people would react to their game or their DLC.

    My point is: How can anybody at EA possibly feel that it is a good idea to implement this, or better still announce it like this? Do they think the reaction will be positive? That we'll fill up these comments with "YAY I'm glad they're putting this in! I'll totally buy it!" If I was releasing a game and the things I said met an overwhelming response of "I'm not buying it now" then I'd do some more research.

    On the DRM not though. Goddamn, once again a bunch of lies. Most of the features don't need always online, most Simcity players don't even care about multiplayer, and even if they did; once again the system doesn't need always online! Multiplayer in games worked just fine 10 years ago people!

      It's called ignoring the vocal minority :) is shit, those bastards banned me for swearing in bf3....

    It's not the "always online" issue which irritates me. Honestly, we can't control it, and we shouldn't be surprised or outraged that it's being implemented on a wider scale. It sucks, yes, but deal with it.
    What pisses me off is Haber doing his absolute best to avoid saying "this is an anti-piracy measure". It reeks of PR spin, what with the talk of "the cloud" and so on. Anyone remotely connected with this industry knows what it is - an attempt to control piracy.
    Why can't people just be honest about it? They're not fooling anyone.

    If all games were always on I'd have a problem with it but from what I can tell It's going to be a core part of the experience . I'm ok with that.
    If your net sucks don't blame the game , blame the provider (crazy!)

    Shame, was really looking forward to this. I DON'T want to to play Multiplayer SimCity. Why make it "always multiplayer" I hate online gaming. I just want me and my city... typical EA, always trying to complicate things.

    The main thing that annoys me about these decisions are things like this:

      One would hope EA have tested Single player games with the ability to turn this off for single player gameing.

      Unlike Steam, whob have said if they ever go out of business, all games will work with the DRM turned 'off'. EA and Ubi are yet to make statments like this :/

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now