Is Paul McCartney Writing Music For Halo's Original Studio?

Back in January, Paul McCartney -- yes, the former Beatle -- said he was working on music for an unnamed video game. It now appears that video game is being made by Bungie, the original studio behind the Halo franchise.

McCartney today Tweeted that image above (and posted it to his Facebook page) with the caption: "I'm really excited to be working on writing music with Bungie, the studio that made Halo." No other details were offered. (Bungie also shared the photo on its Facebook page.)

In May, a contract between Activision and Bungie turned up in the lawsuit between Activision and the creators of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. The document said Bungie had been signed to make four science-fiction shooters to be released every other year beginning in 2013. The contract also said Bungie is working on a Marathon title, based on its hit series for the Macintosh back in the 1990s.

Nothing McCartney said confirms he's either composing or consulting on the soundtrack for either game. But Activision has deep pockets and that four-game package figures to be a pretty big time commitment for Bungie, leaving not much room for side gigs of this size. And McCartney did say he's working on music for a game. It's not too much of a stretch to think he's involved in Bungie's new project.

h/t Aaron T.


Comments

    If theres anything worse than the Beatles, it's definitely McCartneys solo work.

      Many things are worse than the Beatles

      Wow.. The ignorance in this post, it's so thick I can cut it with a knife!

      Seriously if it wasn't for bands like The Beatles a lot of musicians who came after them would not exist or sound the same, just ask Ozzy Osbourne or Lemmy Kilmister.

        Just because something's important doesn't mean it's automatically good or better than another thing that derived from it.

        Like how whenever a "top 100 games of all time" type list is compiled, and you always see things like Tetris or OoT mentioned somewhere in the top ten, and often captioned with a little passage on how important they are. But even the mighty GoldenEye is often described as having aged horribly and to be nearly unplayable today.

      You mean well written songs that didn't use auto-tune or have the advantage of being able to edit on a computer post-recording and still sound better than most of the crap that gets released today? Really?

      omigodomigodomigodomigodomigodomigodomigod!!!!

    The Beatles were shit.

    Deal with it hipsters.

      While I don't really enjoy the Beatles, there's a BIG difference between "were shit" and "are shit".

Join the discussion!