Assassin’s Creed III: The Kotaku Review

Assassin’s Creed III: The Kotaku Review

It is one of the best video games of the year, one of the most daring developed by a major studio this generation, and one of the most beautiful to ever run on any machine. It stumbles from some awkward glitches and some game design over-reach, but it is superb in a surprising number of small ways. Refreshingly, it is a game about America that doesn’t settle for simple fictions when the uncomfortable truths about the United States’ history would be more interesting.

Plus, it’s the best tree-climbing simulator in history. Really, you might want to play Assassin’s Creed III just for the trees.

Assassin’s Creed III is primarily set before and during the American Revolution. Like its predecessors it occasionally switches to modern times, and that parellel timeline has become more pressing than ever: the modern-era part of the game is set in the weeks before the supposed December 2012 destruction of planet Earth.

The game is played in third-person across a massive stretch of late 18th-century frontier as well in bustling Boston and New York. The game’s cities are packed with things to do: buildings to climb, people to kill, dogs to pet, guards to avoid, assassins to recruit, almanac pages to collect, underground mazes to explore, tomahawks to buy, plague-infested blankets to burn and much, much more. The cities are more densely populated with activities than past Assassin’s Creed games, and the frontier is more fun thanks to the ample opportunity it affords gamers to hunt animals, stalk redcoats, climb cliffs, admire waterfalls.

If you’re getting the sense that there’s a lot of stuff in this game, you’re right. I’ll try not to list all of it, because as busy as the game is, and as nice as it is that you can finally stack quests, the quiet moments in the game are to be cherished. Sometimes, the best thing to do is just explore the wilderness with no goal at all. Do this, and you’ll wind up on some unexpected side adventures (an early mission has you tracking down whatever it really was that Daniel Boone thought was a Sasquatch).

The player mostly controls a Native American of mixed heritage named Ratonhnhaké:ton or, as he is referred to mostly in the game, Connor. Connor is not the charmer Ezio was. He’s actually rather irritable and not as fun a man to be as his assassin ancestors, but his journey is a moving one and is ultimately, supremely satisfying.

You control Connor from his childhood all the way into his assassinating prime. But as it tends to do, Assassin’s Creed III has some surprises in store. In this case — and without giving things away — the game’s extended early sequences will allow you to put off playing as Connor for as many as five hours (which is as long as I held out), if not even more. For the sake of readers sensitive to spoilers, I’ll skip mentioning just what it is you can do in the game for so long before you assume the role of Connor. The answer emerges within 15 minutes of playing the game yet masks even more twists, each of which is wound throughout the rest of the adventure.

There is, however, a necessary warning surrounding this part of the game: AC III is a slow starter and much of what is most commendable about it, as with last year’s equally grand The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword is held back while what some might view as the game’s lengthy interactive prologue wraps up. Eventually, Connor’s training is complete and in chapter six of a 12-chapter game, the world finally opens up in grand fashion.

I am, perhaps, already going in too deep in my explanation, such as is easy to do with what is probably just one of the biggest games ever made. There are simply more parts to this game than most. (Warning: another extended list of features coming!)

There is the framing device: the 2012-era adventures of Desmond Miles the supposed saviour of the world who is ostensibly living the lives of various assassin ancestors of his each time he gets in a device called the Animus. In the first Assassin’s Creed players controlled Desmond very briefly and mostly played through a series of assassination adventures committed by his ancestor Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad during the 12th-century Crusades in the Middle East. In Assassin’s Creed II, AC: Brotherhood and AC: Revelations Desmond mostly re-lives the playable memories of 15th century Renaissance Italy assassin Ezio Auditore da Firenze. Connor is yet another of his ancestors. With each game, Desmond’s playable sections expand. In AC III Desmond has his biggest part yet, and players will be using the modern character to some exploration too. Desmond’s climbing tasks prove to be some of the game’s most interesting. (Again, surprises lurk and you’d probably prefer I don’t tell you).

The core of Assassin’s Creed games is the hunt-and-be-hunted gameplay. That’s Connor’s main deal. Like Altair and Ezio, he is a member of an ages-old order that fights an ages-old battle against the Templars. Theoretically the freedom-loving Assassins are the good guys, but that’s always been a bit murky and made even murkier in this game, the most morally gray, by far, of the series.

As his predecessors could before him, Connor can walk, run, scale the face of a building, creep up on his targets, engage them in melee or ranged combat (he’s good with a tomahawk, pistol and bow, mostly), or sometimes just eavesdrop or sidle in for some pickpocketing.

The Assassin’s Creed games have never controlled much better than a mostly-trained dog, so at times Connor will seemingly defy the player’s inputs, scaling partway up a building instead of running down the alley next to the building. Sometimes his horse gets all kinds of tangled up in the forest bushes instead of galloping down a path. Sometimes standing up out of cover will ruin a mission when all you wanted him to do was prowl, crouched, to the next hiding spot. Most of the time, though, the game controls fine and Connor’s two-handed fighting techniques make him a vicious and fun action hero to control. A ring of enemies still mostly take their turns attacking, but they are far better at blocking, countering and resisting Connor’s chain-killing moves and attempts to disarm them than Assassin’s Creed enemies of the past. In this game, players will die much more than in the last few games, mostly through faults of their own.

Assassin’s Creed III

It may not be the best Assassin’s Creed, but it is a refreshing recharge to a well-made series. It’s an important game about America, about killing bad guys and about climbing beautiful trees.

Developer: Ubisoft
Platforms: PS3 (reviewed), Xbox 360
Released: October 30
Type of game: historical tourism / American revolution assassin adventure / Daniel Boone errand-doer / modern-day end-of-the-world preventer / third-person action
What I played: 43% of the game over the course of 20 hours, 49 minutes and 27 seconds, finishing the main campaign, doing a small amount of all the numerous types of sidequests and barely touching the multiplayer. (Note: This review will be updated within a week to factor in the game’s multiplayer, which is hard to judge pre-release, and harder still when Hurricane Sandy is screwin’ with the internet.)

My Two Favourite Things

  • Finding a lot of the old, tired elements of Assassin’s Creed freshened up, a perfect complement for the game’s many narrative surprises.
  • The writing. really. From the smartly written in-game database to the broader, simpler fact that this is not a game that worships American’s founding fathers blindly.

My Two Least-Favourite Things

  • Riding horses. They never go where you want to go. They often get stuck.
  • The AI. These guards in these games need to be smarter or at least give a damn if I’m killing their buddies, even if said killing is happening more than 10 metres from their post.


  • “This is no minor series update. It deserves a number at the end of its title.” — Stephen Totilo, Kotaku
  • “Plays better with its day-one patch; maybe could use another.” — Stephen Totilo, Kotaku
  • “The Desmond sections are getting better, and the naval combat’s indisputably terrific!” — Stephen Totilo, Kotaku

The game’s creators do a good job of mixing up Connor’s missions (that’s a full one in the video above, from about two-thirds into the game). Sometimes you’re just tasked with assassinating someone in Boston. Other times, you’re riding a horse with Paul Revere to warn people that the British are coming. Sometimes you’re commanding dozens of troops at war with Redcoats. And then there are missions like the Boston Tea Party, which are made clumsy by the game’s box-throwing controls or the late-game mission that requires a rapid gallop through the forest yet is nearly ruined by the terrible tendency of the game’s horses to go off the beaten path. Despite the abundance of AC games, though, the mission design feels fresh and is full of new turns. There is also lots of historical tourism, so when you’re not meeting Sam Adams or Ben Franklin, you’re witnessing the Boston Massacre firsthand or running around the battle of Bunker Hill.

Publishers from big video game companies are not known for subtlety or complexity of theme, and games set in America or tied to America’s great military victories tend to wave the flag without pause. The marketing always suggested that ACIII’s igniting of the Revolution would be a game of interactive jingoism; its developers always said it was not. The developers were the ones being accurate.

Fortunately, the game is refreshingly sceptical about the values fuelling the Revolution while not knee-jerk anti-American either. The characters acknowledge the hypocrisy of freedom-loving Founding Fathers owning slaves just as they celebrate their resistance to non-democratic tyranny. Connor is no mere change of skin tone for the series’ protagonists; he is a man whose people will not win in the new America, and the game presents that painful truth not as a side note or history-textbook-footnote but as one of the main currents that pushes ACIII’s story along.

This new game’s developers earn the player’s trust and respect repeatedly throughout the game, not just because of the story they’re choosing to tell but because of how smartly and carefully they have re-thought most of Assassin’s Creed’s side content. They vowed to avoid repeating many of the gameplay loops of previous Assassin’s Creed games and, for the most part they did. You may still have to climb to the tops of buildings (or massive trees!) to survey the land and fill out a mini-map, and you may still be able to pull wanted posters from walls to reduce the heat level that compels guards to chase you. But in so many ways, the old systems of Assassin’s Creeds have been chucked for better ones.

  • For example, the series used to hide collectible items in high perches. The new one still does, but some of those collectibles — almanac pages — blow away in the wind. You need to chase after them.
  • The old games let you unlock locations on the cities that would let you fast-travel to other parts of the cities. The new game allows for large-leap fast-travel, but in cities, the game’s creators now turn each effort to unlock an intra-city fast travel conduit into an Assassin’s Creed version of a maze-filled dungeon.
  • Some of the old games let you raid towers; the new one has you infiltrating and dismantling the defence in forts.
  • The old games let you join with thieves or brawlers and run some missions for them; the new game teams you with Daniel Boone or other frontiers-people to investigate clues and strange sightings on the frontier.
  • Some of the old games let you upgrade a villa; the new game lets you upgrade an entire homestead, tasking you with meeting people who will set up homes and businesses there, running missions involving those people and even having something of a Pokemon Snap-style photography system for capturing scenes of the homesteaders doing various interesting things. I could go on, but that’s plenty.
  • Oh… one more: the concept of recruiting assassins is back, as is sending them away on missions (this time across the eastern seaboard), but this time, the assassins that can be recruited are specific characters with specific needs and the abilities that having a cadre of assassin recruits unlock are more than just “please kill that guy for me.”

(One thing that hasn’t changed: the incredible writing in the game’s database. Seriously. Read all of the lore that is unlocked as you play. It is as insightful as it is hilarious, all of it written in the voice of the put-upon modern-day British agent who is helping Desmond stay alive during the adventures in the Animus.)

What’s striking about Assassin’s Creed III is both how many elements and side-elements it has and how well-made most of them are. Ubisoft puts an army of developers on their AC games and it seems that these armies have tried to out-do each other, with so many parts of the game that could be side-projects rivalling the game’s main quest in level of quality.

All that said, it is equally striking how precariously Assassin’s Creed creaks under the weight of its developers’ intent. I played the game on the PlayStation 3 and don’t know if it’s the six-year-old hardware to blame or the game’s programming, but AC III is a game that will birth many a glitch memes. Even a day-one patch has not cleansed the sprawling open-world from the occasional malfunction. I had no crash bugs. And the one mission-ruiner I experienced early on that involved a guard being artificially un-intelligent, has been patched out.

This game is, simply, a great producer of screw-ups. Most don’t affect gameplay. In the 20 hours I played, I saw one guard standing, waist-deep, inside a wooden cart, as if it was built around him; I heard the sounds of combat during a single enemy encounter play entirely wrong (see the video above) and I got a cannonball to stall in mid-air because it was fired right as a cutscene began. In one underground maze I entered a room that had malfunctioning textures that displayed beams of wood as flashing, static-y rainbows. Across 20 hours, those were nearly all the glitches I found, so they were not enough to ruin the game — not close to it — but more than plenty to merit a warning.

Unfortunately, our Kirk Hamilton, who has been playing the Xbox 360 version, says he’s seeing more frequent glitches: nothing game-ruining for him, but clumsy transitions in and out of scenes, music cutting off when it shouldn’t, civilians vanishing into thin air, and the occasional AI screw-up. Combine this with the fact that the game’s enemies do betray some standard video game stupidity (the soldiers in one corner of a huge fort stay at their post while I’m loudly murdering their captain and buddies at the other end), and you wind up with a game that feels like it would benefit from a couple more patches and a more powerful machine.

The glitches didn’t affect gameplay and were infrequent. They are, however, prevalent enough that when, say, you’re in the frontier and can’t find the treasure trinket that your map and the a buzzing audio cue indicate should be right in front of you, first you think that maybe the trinket is in a tree, but then youwonder if maybe it just didn’t load in the scene because of a glitch.

Whatever it is compelling you to climb a tree in Assassin’s Creed, you are in for a good time once you get up there. Everything else I’ve written here is secondary to the feeling of smoothly running up the trunk of one tree and then skipping from branch to branch through the forest with a grace usually reserved for ballerinas or gazelles. Given that neither ballerinas nor gazelles do their thing in the canopy of an 18th century forest, advantage: Connor. Advantage: Assassin’s Creed III.

The title Assassin’s Creed III is a lie insofar as this is the fifth console Assassin’s Creed game. Ubisoft put the number on there to sell the game better and to sell the idea of radical change. The number is earned. The game is not just set in a radically different place at a very different time; the sense of reinvention runs to the game’s very core.

ACIII packs surprises big and small, veers away from habits of the older games, looks a hell of a lot better than them too, thanks to a new graphics engine. All things considered, it winds up perhaps not as refined as Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood, but far more satisfying and well-crafted than the rough draft of Assassin’s Creed 1. Connor may not have Ezio’s flair, but he has a game that rivals the quality of the Italian’s trilogy. Cautious consumers might want to wait for the inevitable subsequent patches, but those who don’t mind a few cosmetic bugs should have no fear. This is a great game.

P.S. The game has multiplayer too, with a story and some design twists of its own. Having only played a few missions of it, I’ll reserve any critical assessment for now but will update this review within the next week with a fuller take on that aspect of the game. For those looking for just some basic details, Brotherhood and Revelations’ multiplayer is back, pitting players against each other in challenges to find players hiding in crowds full of computer-controlled civilians. There is still a lot of Modern Warfare-style levelling-up and ability-unlocking, but now there are also co-op multiplayer assassination matches and not one but two narratives that are unlocked as you play — one about the series’ evil company Abstergo, which ostensibly made this multiplayer part of ACIII, the other also about the company but told by some hackers who, in a cheeky move by Ubisoft, also serve as the justification for letting players pay real money to unlock upgrades and items in the game that could otherwise be obtained through continued play.


  • Assassin’s Creed is one of those franchises I really want to like, but never seem to click with. The futuristic Desmond storyline seems to take over and disrupt the flow, and I play through those parts feeling frustrated just wanting to get back into the “real game”. Will probably still give Assassin’s Creed III a go however, it might turn things around for me. 🙂

    • See, I’m exactly the opposite. Can’t really bring myself to care about 15th century Italians; I just want to be Desmond in the near-future/present investigating weird centuries-old conspiracies.

      • I’m not sure if I can see that, firstly because it would mean they would need to scrap the whole animus/syncronization/memory aspects of AC and frankly if they do that won’t it just be like Uncharted? lol

        • Since i havent finished Revelations yet im not 100% sure if this is accurate, but while playing in the datastream of desmonds memories dont they hint at the fact that Desmond is actually just someone else’s Memories anyway? And thet he is in fact inside some “animus” like situation, without realising?

          • No idea, I didnt see that but I dont doubt its there. I wouldnt be surprised if it plays out that way.

          • It does make a little sense given that in revelations you have access to Ezio accessing Altiars memories… so obviously you can do some sort of inception thing..

          • Indeed, plus it would be kinda cool in the very final act to draw back, in the distant future and find out you’re someone living Desmonds life through an Animus 🙂

      • I’m the same. The Desmond sections have always been my favourite part of the series.
        I skipped Brotherhood and Revelations because I was tired of the overall gameplay, despite the terrific upgrades they made from AC to AC2.
        I just wanted to see Desmond’s story. I was disappointed that AC3 wasn’t an entirely Desmond centered game, but hearing that they have improved the gameplay, I’m pretty keen to give it a whirl.

      • @michael : Sounds like our problems are similar mate, I just refer the “past stuff” and you prefer the “future stuff”. Preference aside, the flow of the game is still being disrupted when changing from one era to another. This is the core reason I have trouble getting into AC because it never seems to come together coherently. This is just my personal opinion of course, and I’m not dissing the games (which are quite very well made and entertaining). They just haven’t “clicked” with me as much as I thought they would.

      • Same man, I love advancing Desmond’s story, the setting and assassin is cool and all, but I’m here for my Adam Sandler look-alike parts

    • The desmond stuff for me is the better stuff, I want them to Make a full game set in the future, as good as the past is for the history and the setup i’d very much like to scale a futuristic city.

      Number 1 didnt sit well with me, i think i disliked Altiar.
      Ezio was more my style in number 2, Ladies man and scoundrel, but in brotherhood and the small amount i’ve played in revelations (planning to finish before WiiU release of AC3), he gets more douchy..

      Given im not a Fan of American history im worried i may not like AC3, and with the comment that conner doesn’t have teh flair that ezio had, it makes me more so.

    • I agree. I HATED the Desmond sections in ACR, they were just too jarring compared to the Ezio story. I’m hoping Ubisoft has given Desmond a more satisfying role this time 🙂

  • I played it for a few hours after midnight, there are definately alot of bugs and glitches most involving graphic spasms or NPCs glitching ontop of boxes/barrels or falling into land/air.

    I’m sure it will be patched though and it’s a touch of fresh air to finally move along with the AC story unlike the last two filler games.

    Overall happy.

  • Thanks for taking the time to do this review, I am still counting down the minutes for the PSN store upload of Liberation…

  • I had resolved to not go day one with AC this year…. ergh…. resolve breaking. Not getting the overpriced CE is still progress right? :p

  • Question – do you every fight the revolutionaries, because the the reviews suggest you only kill red coats no matter what Connor feels about it.

  • I never finished AC2 not played the Brotherhood and Revelations. Did the Desmond conclude in those two games? Did you ever operate him as more than a man in a room?

  • I have the 360 version of the CE pr-eorderd and I simply have to go in to EB and pick it up. I would have preferred the PC version but i still have doubts over Ubisoft’s PC port. I have a really awesome gaming rig so should I wait for that version to come out? Or stick with the collectors edition? Tough choice but if they pull off the port the game will look amazing.

  • By the time I get around to playing this, probably in 2014 or so, it’ll be patched to the bejeezus. I’m only part way through Creed I!

  • The more I hear about this game the less inclined I am to buy it. What is this, the fifth game in the franchise? Not including the other ones on psp etc. Yawn, give me something new.

    • Was the whole point of this review not to say how all the best parts had been included while still being riddled with new features?

      • Tbh I got halfway through and found myself struggling to keep reading. As much as I enjoyed AC and AC2, it’s the same crap. Just because a game makes a lot of money, doesn’t necessarily mean you should start pumping game after game under the same name.

  • Played it for four hours before. Not really feeling it to be honest. Liked 1, loved 2, BR and REV. 3 you play as Connors dad for the first 3 – 4 hours. Thats right. 3 – 4 HOURS. The worst part is, it could’ve all been compressed down to a bloody cutscene or two. I get the whole ‘setting up the backstory for Connor’ thing but it’s drawn out massively in a way it didn’t need to be. There’s an overly long completely unnecessary chapter on a boat going to America, a long section IN America thats unneeded… it just feels like complete filler. Playing for 4 hours and not even up to Connor yet. Combat feels clunky, controls aren’t as smooth as Revs were. I wanted to love 3, Im a huge fan, but so far I’m very disappointed with AC3. 6.5 out of 10 from me personally at this point, hopefully it’ll get a lot better once I actually get to use Connor but it’s suffering Kojima syndrome (walk CUTSCENE, walk CUTSCENE, do something CUTSCENE, fart CUTSCENE) and FF13 syndrome (Daddy section is way too drawn out so far).

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!