Assassin’s Creed III DLC Gives Connor And George Washington Alternate Histories

18 responses to “Assassin’s Creed III DLC Gives Connor And George Washington Alternate Histories”

1. 

   spaghett

   December 11, 2012 at 9:34 am

   So he never became an Assassin?

   Would we just continue to play as Haytham?

   Reply
   1. 

      firaenix

      December 11, 2012 at 9:41 am

      Well in the flashes in the video, it shows Connor, not in his Assassin’s Robes, but in clothes made of pelts of fur. I think it is safe to say we will play as that Connor

      Reply
   2. 

      ad

      December 11, 2012 at 11:52 am

      Wouldn’t that be nice…..I’m up to Sequence 10 and I’d like nothing more than to a game entirely devoted to Haytham. He’s the only character in the game who isn’t either bland or written to be a nauseating cheerleader for the 4th of July.

      Reply
      1. 

         spaghett

         December 11, 2012 at 11:55 am

         I know, Haytham was the bomb, and I genuinely enjoyed playing him

         Sure he is and arm of the Templars, but so what, a fantastic character

         Reply
         1. 

            ethanw

            December 11, 2012 at 3:02 pm

            I agree. This game was pretty lacking in likeable/interesting characters, but he was great. He also made this the first game since the original where I actually paused to questions the actions/motives of the Assassins. Connor was just so bland.

            That said, I’m more than a little concerned about the price.

            Reply
            1. 

               spaghett

               December 11, 2012 at 3:09 pm

               So bland

               And I had gotten so sick of Ezio

            2. 

               ethanw

               December 11, 2012 at 3:36 pm

               Older Ezio, yeah. His character in ACII and AC:B was funny and relatable. As were a few others, like Leonardo, etc.

            3. 

               spaghett

               December 11, 2012 at 3:43 pm

               I also am concerned about the price

               To me it doesn’t seem worth it

2. 

   firaenix

   December 11, 2012 at 9:38 am

   Wii U? Wii U 🙁

   Reply
3. 

   bathmatt

   December 11, 2012 at 10:40 am

   Y’know, this is an interesting enough concept to have been a stand-alone game. Hell, I’d have bought it, which is more than I can say for AC3.

   Reply
4. 

   Ben

   December 11, 2012 at 12:40 pm

   $30 for single DLC out of 5, thats absurd considering we’ve already paid for the game. drop the price

   Reply
   1. 

      Emma

      December 11, 2012 at 3:30 pm

      Its 30$ for the season pass isnt it?

      Reply
   2. 

      brody

      December 11, 2012 at 6:27 pm

      fairly sure it’s going to count as 3 dlcs considering its in 3 parts so $10 a dlc.

      Reply
5. 

   shane

   December 11, 2012 at 2:01 pm

   Shite, $30. It’d want to be a pretty decent sized game (or part of a decent sized bundle) for that kind of moolah.

   Reply
   1. 

      redartifice

      December 11, 2012 at 2:14 pm

      50 in Aus.

      Reply
      1. 

         shane

         December 11, 2012 at 2:29 pm

         Good god almighty. Giving that a miss, then.

         Reply
         1. 

            redartifice

            December 11, 2012 at 2:34 pm

            Yeah, it’s pretty steep. I might have paid that if it was going to be Borderlands-level extensive, but I think I’ll wait for a sale.

            Reply
6. 

   frycook48

   December 11, 2012 at 7:27 pm

   That is a ridiculous price! I’m skipping!

   Reply
7. 

   banderdash

   December 11, 2012 at 8:47 pm

   Isn’t the whole game alternative history?

   Reply