Seems Like Thief Really Is In Serious Trouble

Seems Like Thief Really Is In Serious Trouble
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Kotaku Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

We’d been hearing rumours that the new Thief was in trouble, which made for a worrisome combination with the findings of our columnist/sleuth Superannuation, who last June dug up a distressing amount of turnover at the game’s developer Eidos Montreal. A new report at Polygon backs up those earlier concerns, describing a laborious creative process, conflicting visions, high-level staff turnover and a generally troubled development for the high-profile sequel.

Citing sources familiar with the studio, Polygon reports that the team at Eidos Montreal has been hamstrung by conflicting creative visions, most of which stem from high-level turnover, as each new senior designer would scrap old ideas and bring in new ones. The team was also sidetracked by a push to create promotional demos, reportedly spending 10 months working on a single demo, which was eventually shown to Game Informer for a cover story and to the rest of the press shortly afterward.

From Polygon:

The current version of Thief barely resembles the initial concept, says a source. The vertical slice doesn’t load inside Thief’s current heavily modified version of Unreal Engine 3. Many programming tricks were necessary to run the current demonstration, like turning off non-playable character AI — the engine has trouble when too many characters are on screen.

At GDC in March, I saw the press demo of the game and couldn’t quite get a handle on it; it felt as thrown-together as it sounds like it actually was. It was difficult to tell whether or not the game was truly reacting to the player, or even if it was being played at all, in places. We weren’t allowed to play the game ourselves, and as with any hands-off demo, were asked to take the developers’ word that the game worked as it appeared to. The demo didn’t give me what felt like an accurate view of the game, though trashing a hands-off demo felt unnecessary. In the end, I decided not to write it up.

Superannuation’s detective work last June turned up a number of staff departures that dovetail with the Polygon report:

One of the more mystifying absences from last week’s E3 was Eidos Montreal’s Thief 4, a game which has been in development for four years — an amount of time that encompasses the entirety of the development cycle for the studio’s first game, Deus Ex: Human Revolution. If a perusal of various online resumes is anything to go by, the project appears to be rather beleaguered.

After two-plus years of work on the project, Thief 4 audio director and composer Paul Weir left the Eidos Montreal in March. The month prior, lead level designer Adam Alim went to WB Games Montreal. He apparently is not the only lead level designer to hop off the team — Pierre-Olivier Clement, the previous lead level designer, apparently moved to another project at Eidos Montreal last year. Among other departures: two senior concept artists exited Eidos to a freelance career after nearly two and three years, respectively; a senior technical level designer left last month; a senior animator went back to Ubisoft last September; and a senior level designer moved to something else at Eidos in August.

When contacted by Kotaku, the game’s publisher Square Enix declined to comment. All in all, sounds like unhappy times for Thief.


  • Sad. Thief 2 is the best single player first person experience ever, imo. Sounds like they are technically struggling? Meanwhile all the content creatives are leaving as they struggle to get any of their vision realised?

  • Thief was a stealth game soaking with atmosphere and originality.
    The engrossing music, the unique art style and most importantly the fantastic voice acting of memorable characters.
    It is clear to any Thief fan that EIDOS Montreal have no clue how to recreate this gem.
    The refusal to hire the iconic voice of Garrett (Stephen Russell) after three games strong!! and the action move vibe of the trailer shows me something is off with this new Thief.

  • I wouldn’t worry just yet. Does anyone remember the talk of trouble during the development of Bioshock Infinite? I know there’s a very different studio and team involved, but some truly great games have emerged despite issues during development. And some truly crap ones as well. Hopefully, these are just horrible labour pains before the miracle of life.

    Yes, it can be troubling to read, especially when you’re talking about a franchise you have so much love for, but let’s have a little less pessimism. It’s not going to turn into Aliens: Colonial Marines. I hope.

    • Makes you wonder though. I mean… hypothetically, let’s say it turns out bad. A:CM bad. After spending millions on making it, is it something they’d have the chops to just put down and walk away from, or would the temptation be too great to try and recoup at least something on the piece of trash by taking a punt on brand/ignorance-inspired sales?

      The damage done to Gearbox doesn’t seem to have been that bad. I mean, they bought themselves a lot of leeway with Borderlands 2 and throwing Timegate under the bus. Yeah, folks have been pretty vocal on their forums about, “Don’t do a A:CM with Homeworld,” now that they picked that IP up, but is that damage going to translate into lost sales?

      Not everyone has the budget to Starcraft Ghost a title, and Square-Enix has been pretty vocal on blaming their Western studios for not making up for the staggering FF-induced holes in their balance sheet.

      • That’s a very good point. Sadly, I think what may happen will be something similar to I am Alive. I actually liked a lot of the ideas that game used, but when it finished, you knew that they hadn’t really “finished” the game. Ubisoft (I think, correct me if wrong) just made it a downloadable game to try and recoup losses of a dev cycle gone too long. Thief could be walking that line. Still better than doing an A:CM, but not nearly what the series deserves.

        I am still hopeful though.

  • Thief 2 was plagued with trouble and turned out brilliant but so was A:CM.
    Hopefully Thief sticks to its franchise roots and turns out as good as 2 (or even 3/Deadly Shadows).

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!