A Locker-Room Talk Might Have Spared Us From Yesterday's Fez Fiasco

The things I said were out of line and the mouth that said them would be out of alignment, too. That's the polite version of a one-way conversation I had about 20 years ago in a far off arena, when the difference between criticism and a harangue was expressed to me in very physical terms.

In the spring of 1992, our freshman year of college at N.C. State, Mark Davis pumped in 25 points to sink our school's most hated rival. Two years later, under my pretentious middle initial and awful Bill Cosby sweater in the column logo, I demanded he be sent to the bench, in shrill terms read by everyone on a Wednesday before their 11:05 class.

Yes, he was shooting poorly. But it was the way I expressed it, professing that I had seen, in his eyes, a fear that led to miss after miss in loss after loss in front of a constituency that deserved more. It festered until we came face to face in the visitor's locker room at Georgia Tech.

"You get the fuck out of my face," Davis told me, "before I bust yours."

Had Twitter been around then, I doubt this encounter would be something my friends and I -- and who the hell knows, maybe Davis does, too -- laugh about now. Social media turns everything into an immediate, vituperative shouting match, as we saw yesterday.

Sports and video games are covered in similar fashion: They're entertainment products; they're covered under shifting rules of access and restriction to it. The game's owners and promoters are so coin-operated, they don't care for many storylines beyond those that focus attention to all the things they're selling. Individual performers become celebrities; so do commentators. There's a frothing, reactionary culture surrounding it all, offering swift and terrible judgment of every word.

At least there's a locker room in sports, that grand tradition I could not avoid 20 years ago. You could say that Marcus Beer and Phil Fish met yesterday in video gaming's locker room equivalent. Beer, a commentator on GameTrailers, insulted Fish, the creative force behind Fez, over some intramural industry slight and the resulting boil-over left Fish so disillusioned he said he had quit not only the work on Fez's sequel, but all of games development, for good.

I consider Twitter, message boards, and the comments under this post and others a poor locker-room substitute. For all the hostility of the medium, no one truly faces anyone they've wronged in such an environment. It's why "kill yourself," which Fish hurled at Beer, is so commonly slung around video gaming discourse. Everyone knows a death threat, much less any physical threat, has zero meaning online. Inviting someone to commit suicide communicates the same total lack of respect for their life without giving out an idle threat to mock.

Davis' threat to me 20 years ago was certainly not idle. Yet the man was a civil engineering major, so I think he was smart enough to know beating my arse over this would not be worth the headache that would follow him. Still, that wasn't a bluff I was willing to call, however.

Though Beer and I are both paid observers of our subject, I end the comparison there. It is breathtaking to me that a commentator with his platform -- GameTrailers isn't some chicken-feed brand -- would go on the record to call Fish or any prominent industry figure a "fucking hipster," a "fucking arsehole," a "wanker" and finally a "tosspot," which is the kind of regional insult snide enough to require you to look it up, and then correct you when you choose its wrong variation.

Beer stylizes himself as the "Annoyed Gamer," as if instant and constant annoyance is not the defining feature of video game discourse. These comments went well beyond the boundary of some caricatured Lewis-Black style comedic rant. Beer took offence that Fish and Jonathan Blow, another independent developer of note, declined to comment to a third publication on a rumoured policy change at Microsoft regarding independent games publication to its new Xbox One platform. That's it. Fish later said he declined to comment because he didn't want to put himself out for unconfirmed information. One assumes this was Blow's reasoning too.

Fine. Phil Fish and Jonathan Blow may be aloof, may be arrogant, may have contempt for the writers and publications covering their industry. I have no idea. I've never met Blow. Fish has a very provocative record of public statements, including a well known attack on Japanese developers and a declaration that gamers are "the fucking worst," about as bad a thing as you could say in making a consumer product.

So what. Those transgressions have been tried and convicted in the court of public opinion, and they are irrelevant here. Yesterday, Beer failed to articulate why Fish and Blow's refusal to comment on an incremental industry matter should mean anything to someone other than him, or to a games writer like him. As his rant tails off, he advises the rest of the specialty press to remember this, and ignore developers like Blow and Fish when they have something they wish to discuss.

Well, for Fish at least, he won't be giving people like Beer the satisfaction of that any time soon. Yesterday, Fish canceled the sequel to Fez -- the game which won him so much notoriety and acclaim. Though he couched the decision as cumulative in nature -- just tired of all the bullshit that goes with being a public figure in this subject -- it was certainly provoked by Beer's uncalled-for rant and the ugly screaming match that resulted. I'm half imagining a future in which Fish is almost a Salinger-esque figure, and fuzzy-cheeked idealists in the year 2030 go take pictures of his mailbox and ponder what could have been.

I go back and reread what I wrote about Mark Davis and even now, even though I apologized to him in print later, it frankly doesn't seem that unreasonable. I called out a poor shooting percentage (29 per cent) and how moving him back to guard disrupted a better tandem in place there. I mentioned the fact he struggled to inbounds the ball when called to do so. Yeah, this had to have been hard to hear, coming from someone who never coached or played basketball at his level, or any other.

But I didn't call him a wanker, or a tosspot, or a fucking arsehole, either. And Mark Davis didn't quit his game, either. We met in a quiet locker room and came face to face with the thing causing us so much unhappiness, and decided, in the end, this all just wasn't worth it.

Stick Jockey is Kotaku's column on sports and video games. It appears Sundays.

To contact the author of this post, write to [email protected] or find him on Twitter @owengood.

WATCH MORE: Gaming News


Comments

    A well-written and mature article. Needless to say it will now be mercilessly attacked by complete strangers who feel you've personally insulted them in some way, because they're who everything is really all about.

    Screw that. Jonathan Blow and Phil Fish are stuck up douchebags that make mediocre games. Their real talent is in promoting themselves, and ten they trash the medium they use to do it and make millions of dollars.

    They've drank too much of their own kool-aid and need to be brought back down to earth. It's high time somebody cut them down to size.

    People will quickly forget about Fez 2. Nobody will be pining for what could have been. Quit feeding their brilliant rock star narrative. It's a load of crap.

      Talking about ego?

      You get to judge where their real talent lies?
      You claim their popular, well-loved games are mediocre?

      More drivel from armchair critics, who criticize everything as if they're above it all, without knowing a damn thing.

      --

      It's this sort of stuff which really drags us down.

      So much negativity towards the efforts of others.

      Yes, some people who create stuff will be cocky, and arrogant, and that's certainly not something that's limited to the gaming industry, or even the entertainment industry as a whole - does it really matter?

      There will always be people creating stuff for others, and there will always be millions of envious ants trying to drag them down.

      Wonder which one is of more value to society.

      Last edited 29/07/13 2:53 pm

    This was a really good read. Good to see some really well thought-out opinion journalism.

    I really enjoyed this article. I've thought before about the similarities between sport and gaming media/fans. At the moment, the frenzied, self entitled, frothing that follows any news in either field honestly drains my energy. Someone gives away a penalty in a match at the weekend and JimBob from Western Sydney demands his membership money back and a signed and certified copy of the coachs resignation. Then JimBob has the ORDASSERTEE to have a spelling mistake in their comment and AngryLibrarian69 feels it appropriate to call him a ****ing Stupid *un*. Unbearable.

    Excellent article. 9 out of 10 times arguments happen not because of the content of the conversation but because of its delivery. Courtesy, manners and maturity can make the hardest to take criticism easier to hear and deal with.

    Up until all this had occurred, I hadn't even known that Phil had said negative things towards anyone else prior to this BlowFish debacle, and had just been interested in the game itself, and excited for the sequel.

    Oh the internet, how childish things become when we don't have the physical distance between us to act as a cool-down period for stupidity.

    Lets hope they sort everything out and do make Fez2, because even with the drama, I would still be interested

    They're both idiots, but the dev of Fez is the real idiot here. Hurr durr someone bullied me I'm gonna cry to mummy. No one's going to help Fish, and we'll find other, BETTER games to play.

    Twats.

Join the discussion!