Hollywood’s Long History Of Mostly Failing To Make Video Games

Hollywood’s Long History Of Mostly Failing To Make Video Games
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Kotaku Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

As mainstream video games strived to be more cinematic and as gaming emerged as a major source of entertainment revenues, it was only a matter of time until the talent from the film industry would attempt to get in on the action. Such a thing has indeed happened numerous times. For whatever reason, it typically has not worked out.

But let’s start with an exception.

The most obvious example of Hollywood talent getting gaming right a large percentage of the time is George Lucas, who was way ahead of the curve when he founded Lucasfilm Games (later known as LucasArts) in the early 1980s. Over LucasArts’ storied 30 year history, the company left its indelible mark on the industry through countless Star Wars titles and unforgettable adventure games like Monkey Island, Full Throttle, and Maniac Mansion that conveyed an unabashedly unique design sensibility.

LucasArts’ story is a rarity.

The following set of stories is an attempt at collating all of the attempts of director-gaming collaborations that, for whatever reason, did not work out. This particularly focuses on Western-developed games with talent whose primary experience lies in the live-action/non-animated film sphere. I have no doubt I have missed a number of Japanese-developed collaborations that fell through.

Many of these projects may seem misguided or magnificently mediocre, but there are some gems here and at least a couple of games that probably would have been fun to play.

Steven Spielberg and Nora Ephron’s “That’s Life”

In a section of her book The Men Who Would Be King: An Almost Epic Tale Of Moguls, Movies, and a Company Called DreamWorks, journalist Nicole LaPorte gives an account of the early days of Steven Spielberg’s DreamWorks Interactive — including an unannounced mid-1990s collaboration with the late writer-director Nora Ephron. As LaPorte explains, Spielberg was intent on using his then-nascent interactive division to expand the horizons of the gaming medium beyond a focus on “adrenaline” and reflect the sort of genre diversity found in the average movieplex.

The inclination to diversify games led Spielberg to devise a concept for a game called That’s Life, which LaPorte described as a title along the lines of The Sims “that hinged on the basic interactions and decisions made during the course of a regular day (taking out the trash, making lunch, going out on a date).” LaPorte says this was so alien to DreamWorks Interactive staffers used to action-heavy titles that “Spielberg might have as well proposed making a video game based on The Bridges of Madison County.” Industry legend Noah Falstein told LaPorte he found the idea of virtualizing mundanity to be absolutely absurd, and remarked in the book that he thought the idea “was only really appealing to people like Steven Spielberg, who are so famous that they never have to go to the grocery store or wander around in the streets.”

Spielberg thought his Hollywood friend Nora Ephron, fresh off the hit film Sleepless in Seattle, would be the perfect fit for fleshing out the emotional and relational contexts of the game, so he hired her for the game. Alan Hartman, another early DreamWorks Interactive staffer, told LaPorte he found Ephron amiable in their interactions but got the sense that she agreed to work on the game only because Spielberg asked her to. Issues quickly arose: Ephron, used to writing for linear media, was not accustomed to a game requiring branching narratives and much more dialogue than a typical film script. As time went on, she became more interested in devoting her energies to her next film, the John Travolta angel fantasy-dramedy Michael.

Spielberg thought his Hollywood friend Nora Ephron, fresh off the hit film Sleepless in Seattle, would be the perfect fit for fleshing out the emotional and relational contexts of the game.

Ultimately, That’s Life fizzled, and DreamWorks Interactive pursued another Spielberg concept, which became Medal of Honor.

Steven Spielberg’s “LMNO”

In October 2005, about a decade after That’s Life‘s cancellation and several years after Spielberg sold DreamWorks Interactive to Electronic Arts, EA struck a deal with Steven Spielberg “to create three new original franchise properties” with the teams at Electronic Arts’ Los Angeles studio, which was created from the DreamWorks Interactive sale. (At the time, EALA also employed Spielberg’s son Max as a level designer.)

Only two of those three intellectual properties entered development, and only one of the IPs was actually released — the Wii physics puzzler Boom Blox, which spawned one sequel. The other title, codenamed LMNO, was another attempt at pushing the emotive boundaries of the interactive medium: then-EALA studio head Neil Young said in a 2005 interview following the deal announcement that he hoped this title could resolve whether a computer game could make a person cry.

Writer Matt Leone exhaustively chronicled LMNO’s troubled development in a fantastic 2010 1UP piece. To head up LMNO, EA hired famed game designer Doug Church, known for his lateral-minded game development philosophies. Randy Smith, who worked alongside Church at Looking Glass Studios, was lead designer on the project. In the first iteration of LMNO led by Church, the title was “a first-person action-adventure” with a contemporary setting somewhat along the lines of Mirror’s Edge.

Leone says designers “wanted to make a game that lasted two or three hours, but could be replayed with a lot of variety each time.”

The game revolved around the relationship between the player-controlled character Lincoln and a mysterious AI companion Eve. Designers spent a long time trying to perfect complex AI technology for Eve that would transcend typical in-game scripted responses and allow for her to react dynamically to gameplay situations and player actions in a manner that could meaningfully change in the relationship between the characters and the game’s trajectory.

Rather than a lengthier AAA experience, Leone says designers “wanted to make a game that lasted two or three hours, but could be replayed with a lot of variety each time,” though there was “doubt” among the team that executive-level staff, who were concerned with having enough content to counter used game sales, would approve of the idea.

David Mullich, creative director for Cyberdreams, said in the press release that they hoped “to create an action-adventure which encompasses all levels of human fear and conflict within a challenging game scenario” and combined both “ferocious combat” and “psychological challenge.” The game trapped players in a haunted house and forced them to confront “their Seven Mortal Fears: Fear of the Bad Parent, Fear of the Predator, Fear of Immobility, Fear of Falling, Fear of Drowning, Fear of Loss of Self, and Fear of Chaos. The game began with the players as children forcing with the Fear of the Bad Parent and eventually progressed to “the social, emotional and intellectual disasters that haunt players as teens and adults.”

The game trapped players in a haunted house and forced them to confront “their Seven Mortal Fears: Fear of the Bad Parent, Fear of the Predator, Fear of Immobility, Fear of Falling, Fear of Drowning, Fear of Loss of Self, and Fear of Chaos.

According to adventure game fan site Game Nostalgia‘s chronology of Cyberdreams, Wes Craven’s involvement in the game was fairly peripheral: Craven apparently had just written one page with his so-called principles of fear, and Cyberdreams contracted a firm called Dream Fabrication & Design Inc. to turn those principles of fear into an entire game script and game design document. Asylum Entertainment was then hired to turn that script and design document into an actual game.

Principles of Fear made it further than most director-gaming collaborations: there was a playable demo apparently released, and the game was even exhibited at the 1997 Electronic Entertainment Expo in Atlanta. However, Cyberdreams closed shop in mid-1997, and Asylum was unable to find a new publisher for Principles of Fear, forcing them to cancel the project a number of months away from completion.

Wes Craven’s Other New Game

In an interview at the 2006 MI6 Game Marketing Conference, Wes Craven told journalist Dean Takahashi that “he was in talks to create an original game,” but refused to provide any further details. Though this potential project was probably in his horror wheelhouse, Craven echoed Spielberg’s sentiments about diversifying the emotions found in gaming, saying developers should move beyond “[appealing] to the 14-year-old males with too much testosterone” and incorporate an edifying purpose into their games.

David Lynch’s “Woodcutters From Fiery Ships”

In early 1998, Japanese multimedia publisher and developer Synergy issued a press release announcing it had struck a deal with “David [L]ynch and his Hollywood-based interactive company SubStation” to make a game called Woodcutters From Fiery Ships.

Synergy had previously created the eerie Myst-esque adventure game Gadget: Invention, Travel and Adventure in collaboration with Japanese artist Haruhiko Shono. According to Lynch’s statement in the press release, Gadget had caught Lynch’s eye, and he was impressed with “the way that the game delivered an immersive experience to the user.”

The President of Synergy’s American arm, Natalie Fey, who was “responsible in large part for the partnership”, delivered a rather hyperbolic press release quote:

“David Lynch is not just a filmmaker, but an artist who works with photography, paint, music, sculpture, and now interactive entertainment. His willingness to lend his talents to every phase of this project will lead it to a higher level than ever attained before in gaming. He’s so cool because he wants create a game that even hard-care [sic] gamers will enjoy. He’s not interested in just putting together a string of video clips for your PC.”

The press release stated that a “yet to be announced” group of developers in both Japan and America was going to develop the game for a “yet to be announced” platform “for release in the Fall of 1999.” The press release also claimed that Synergy was going to self-publish the game in Japan but seek publishing partners for Western territories.

Press release: “[Lynch] wants create a game that even hard-care [sic] gamers will enjoy. He’s not interested in just putting together a string of video clips for your PC.”

Unfortunately, the game never quite coalesced. In a late 1999 interview with The Guardian, Lynch said Woodcutters From Fiery Ships was “blocked from the get-go because it would have been completely boring to game buffs.” The paper said, “[Lynch] wanted a ‘conundrum thing… a beautiful kind of place to put yourself. You try to make a little bit of a mystery and a bit of a story, but you want it to be able to bend back upon itself and get lost – really get lost.'” In other words: something distinctly Lynchian.

In the same interview, Lynch also vaguely described the game’s premise, explaining that:

“Certain events have happened or are sort of happening in a bungalow which is behind another house in Los Angeles. And then suddenly the woodcutters arrive and they take the man who we think has witnessed these events, and their ship is… uh, silver, like a 30s sort of ship, and the fuel is logs. And they smoke pipes.”

Also of note: Hi-Tech Expressions, a developer and publisher of mostly licensed titles, was working on a Twin Peaks game for NES in 1990, though there is no indication David Lynch was actually involved. GamePro said the game was “going to be a mystery/brainteaser type [of] cart, rather than an action game,” and Nintendo Power reported that “The plot [was] based on the second season, with multiple endings possible depending on which character [was] played.”

Vin Diesel’s “Perrone”

In 2002, Vin Diesel founded Tigon Studios as an attempt to get a greater degree of creative involvement in the then-unannounced Chronicles of Riddick game that was in development at the time at Starbreeze. Diesel intended for Tigon to oversee and incubate various interactive projects developed at external studios.

When Diesel first confirmed his gaming ambitions while doing press for the DVD release of xXx, he mentioned the first title he hoped to develop, “a mature action-adventure [game] called Perrone“. The game’s title referred to Frank Perrone, a real-life NYPD officer during the 1970s who Diesel said “was simultaneously the most accoladed and excessively aggressive lawman on the force” and someone “involved with both the Mafia and police at the same time.”

The reason for Diesel’s affinity for Perrone — a rather obscure ex-cop — is unclear, and details of Perrone’s exploits are relatively hard to come by. There is only one article in The New York Times‘ archives about Perrone: a 1985 report by now-retired Times crime reporter Selwyn Raab on a ruling against the City of New York in a civil case over a 1978 shooting incident involving Perrone. Raab’s report characterised Perrone as someone who became unhinged and unfit for duty, despite receiving numerous accolades in his early years.

Perrone: Raised on Honor would be “a unique and epic story-driven game set in the South Bronx” between 1969 and 1979.

Diesel’s production company, One Race Films, was also developing a film based on Perrone’s life story as a vehicle for Diesel to star in, though that never quite came together.

A page on the Tigon Studios site, which went online in late 2005, describes Perrone: Raised on Honor as “a unique and epic story-driven game set in the South Bronx” between 1969 and 1979 based on Perrone’s career. Tigon also says Perrone is as “a biographical game,” and “a playable biography of Frank Perrone as well as a mini-biography of the decade” incorporating all sorts of happenings of the period into the game world. There is nothing to suggest, however, that Perrone exists in any manner beyond some pitch materials.

Vin Diesel’s “Melkor” and “Barca B.C.”

Tigon’s site also revealed two other game concepts that do not exist beyond pitch materials — Melkor and Barca B.C. Melkor, named after Diesel’s Dungeons & Dragons character, is an action-RPG Tigon’s copy deems as a “hardcore mature take on Zelda 64“. Tigon claimed Melkor‘s “action/adventure” and “stealth combat” aspects would lend it broad appeal “beyond the traditional fantasy market,” but they were mindful of the deep, rich lore fantasy fans expect from their fantasy materials. (On a recent fan webcast, Diesel trotted out a Melkor document with a 2004 date, if you want to know how much progress has been made on the title.)

The site described Barca B.C. as a “unique” “story-driven” hybrid of a third-person action game and a real-time strategy game “allowing the player to strategize campaigns and then fight in the thick of battle using a third person [point of view] while simultaneously controlling an army of thousands.” The game was based on “the exploits of [Carthaginian general] Hannibal Barca, on [sic] of the greatest military leaders and strategists in the history of mankind.”

Melkor, named after Diesel’s Dungeons & Dragons character, is an action-RPG deemed as a “hardcore mature take on Zelda 64.”

In a 2009 interview, Diesel suggested he had changed to the concept of Barca B.C. to a massively multiplayer title where “you create an avatar that lives in the reality of Hannibal Barca, the Punic Wars and life 200 B.C.” This permutation has not quite panned out either.

Like Perrone, Diesel’s interest in Hannibal Barca isn’t purely game-related: Diesel has been trying to get the ball rolling on a film about the general for more than a decade with no luck. Diesel also worked with BET on an animated Hannibal series that never aired, despite appearing twice at Comic-Con.

Little has been heard of Tigon since the early 2009 releases of The Wheelman and Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena, and if they haven’t been making any movies with the rise of social, mobile and other markets requiring less capital than traditional AAA, it might be safe to assume they are probably defunct.

Bryan Singer’s “Secret Service” and Quentin Tarantino’s Who-Knows-What

In November 2004, director Bryan Singer partnered with Tigon for a new intellectual property Secret Service. Prior to bringing it to Tigon, “Singer developed the project with Mark Feigin, a former staff member on the White House advance team.” Conceptually, the game was “a character-driven, tactical action adventure” about a Secret Service agent protecting the president.

Not one word was ever spoken about the project again, and Tigon quietly removed Secret Service from its website, a good indication it will never happen.

Also, a 2005 MTV article casually mentioned that Tigon had “an untitled project with Quentin Tarantino,” but I’m extremely sceptical of such a claim, given that it has not appeared elsewhere. And a collaboration with one of the most prominent contemporary directors is not something you hide quietly.

John Woo’s “Demonik”

A few days before E3 2003, Variety reported that director John Woo and his production partner Terence Chang had established their own gaming firm Tiger Hill Entertainment, and entered into “multi-year first look development and publishing deal with Sega” under which the two companies would co-create action games based on original concepts and “films Woo has directed.” Sega would have the first right to publish and develop any such projects, but as it was a non-exclusive pact, Tiger Hill could take their projects to other publishers or partners in the event Sega declined interest.

According to Variety, Tiger Hill was also keen on creating intellectual property that could capitalise on the growing gaming industry and also be exploited as “films, TV shows, comic books and toys.” Additionally, Sega hoped to use Tiger Hill’s expertise for other Sega titles in development.

Variety reported that the pair’s first title “was expected to be released sometime in 2004.” Sega of America’s vice president Shinobu Toyoda told the trade that the publisher hoped to enter into a number of similar partnerships with Hollywood talent, and suggested the Tiger Hill deal was “a tip of the iceberg.” The trade also wrote Tiger Hill hoped to similarly establish connections with leading writers and directors. Tiger Hill’s then-newly appointed president Brad Foxhoven told Variety he wanted the firm to be an opportunity for people “to create cool new things without the burden of the studio system holding them back.”

Tiger Hill’s website mentioned three intellectual properties the firm was developing — Sinner, Burglar, and Stranglehold. Sinner was about an assassin who had to battle his way through “Buddhist Hell” after being murdered during his final job, so he could “avenge his death” back on Earth. Burglar was about a master thief who was murdered in his home by a “common burglar.” His “estranged son,” who had never thieved prior, had to become a burglar “to avenge his father’s death.”

The original Stranglehold concept was a bit different from the game Midway eventually released: rather than a sequel-of-sorts to Hard Boiled, Stranglehold was originally about the clash between “[t]wo men on opposite sides of the law” following the murder of a cop’s son, which a gang leader is falsely blamed for.

Above: E3 2005 trailer for Demonik

None of these were, however, Tiger Hill’s first title to enter development — that distinction goes to Terminal Reality’s Demonik. Demonik was a third-person action title about a demon named Volwrath summoned to Earth by various people to exact revenge in various circumstances. The game’s main novelty was Volwrath’s various upgradable special powers he can use throughout the game, including possessing other people and manipulating his environment.

Demonik‘s original writer Todd Farmer (Jason X, Drive Angry 3D) wrote in a blog post that Demonik was originally a Sega project, but Sega had a problem with the game’s story — or apparent lack thereof — and “asked Tiger Hill to take a look at it” in June 2003. To tackle those issues, Tiger Hill tapped Farmer for a quick solution, but Sega ultimately passed on the project in July 2003, and Tiger Hill “later aquired [sic] the rights.”

In February 2004, while the game was without a publisher, Tiger Hill decided that they also wanted to develop Demonik into a feature film. Tiger Hill pitched Demonik to a number of publishers the following month — including Vivendi Universal, THQ, and Take-Two — but ultimately went with Majesco.

Unfortunately for Farmer, the developers at Terminal Reality “were never a fan of his story” — particularly Farmer’s “Faustian elements,” which they feared would come off as too similar to the comic book Spawn. Farmer was incredulous at the notion that anyone thought Todd McFarlane “[owned] the copyright on deals with the devil.” Tiger Hill said they would back Farmer’s creative choices, and “force the issue.” Majesco — who apparently had similar “concerns” as the developers — would ultimately respect Tiger Hill’s decision. At that juncture, Farmer decided to capitulate and work the developers’ preferred story. Farmer even alleged “the designers never wanted a screenwriter playing in their sandbox.”

Despite being cancelled, Demonik was featured prominently in the abysmal Adam Sandler film Grandma’s Boy.

Dejected after having “[e]very outline, every suggestion, every idea [he] had shot down” by “the guy running the show at [Terminal Reality],” Farmer was surprised to learn in late 2004 that Majesco was keen to have him back on board the project, after the publisher found out they were paying him for his writing services but none of his writing was making the actual project. Farmer claimed the main narrative hurdle was the lead designer’s insistence on saving “very interesting, very intricate backstory” the designer wrote for Demonik as some sort of reveal for the game’s sequel, apparently rendering Demonik “a game with no story.”

In addition to reinstating Farmer’s role, Majesco and Tiger Hill also “[wanted] to attach a director to work on the cutscenes as well as take the helm on the later feature version.” Farmer said potential directors mentioned included Wes Craven, John Carpenter, and Clive Barker, whom Farmer “pushed for” personally. By early April 2005, Barker had officially signed on for the Demonik game and film, and Farmer exited the project.

Majesco and Tiger Hill officially announced Demonik the following month, just prior to E3 2005. The title was set for release on the then-forthcoming Xbox 360 console in spring 2006, and was billed as Majesco’s marquee next-generation game. Press materials described the game as “a detailed third-person action game that allows players to control the ultimate bad guy.”

E3 impressions from a behind closed doors alpha build demo of the game were, fairly positive. Previewers seem particularly impressed by the game’s graphical whistles and physics engine.

Demonik was eventually cancelled in early 2006 when Majesco exited the AAA games market after a disastrous fiscal year. That same month Demonik was featured prominently in the abysmal Adam Sandler film Grandma’s Boy. The combination of those two things means Demonik is perhaps best remembered as “the game from Grandma’s Boy,” undoubtedly a fate far worse than mere cancellation.

John Woo’s “Psychopath” and “ShadowClan”
Farmer was also developing another project, Psychopath, at John Woo’s Tiger Hill. According to Variety, Psychopath was “about an ex-CIA operative called back into action to stop a serial killer who begins to question his own sanity.”

Farmer said the first developer Tiger Hill pitched Psychopath to was People Can Fly, who passed because they wanted to focus on a sequel to Painkiller. Soon after, Sega passed on the game, which is apparently “exactly what [Tiger Hill and Farmer] wanted to happen,” so they could have latitude in finding partners for the game, and develop a film version simultaneously. Thereafter, Konami showed interest, but talks ultimately fell apart.

Tiger Hill thought they could generate more interest in the property from game publishers and film studios if they attached a major name to the project, and Farmer opted for John Carpenter. And Carpenter officially signed on board by March 2005. Variety reported that Carpenter’s contract was fairly similar to Barker’s, with Carpenter “[overseeing] the game and [directing] its produced scenes and [also] attached to helm and co-write the film version.”

The following month, John Woo largely wrapped up Tiger Hill’s gaming operations, so the director could concentrate on upcoming films. Two Tiger Hill principles — president Brad Foxhoven and creative director David Wohlestablished their own independent game-focused transmedia firm Titan Productions. Titan absorbed most of Tiger Hill’s slate, including Psychopath, which Variety reported now had an unnamed developer involved. Titan was, however, ultimately unsuccessful on getting any traction for Psychopath.

According to IGN, ShadowClan was an Xbox 360 and PS3 game with a spring 2007 target release date putting players in “the role of a skilled ninja with control of multiple AI characters” in a contemporary New York environment.

Titan also absorbed a Tiger Hill project called ShadowClan that had Woo attached in a major creative role. According to IGN, ShadowClan was an Xbox 360 and PS3 game with a spring 2007 target release date putting players in “the role of a skilled ninja with control of multiple AI characters” in a contemporary New York environment. Gameplay carried a stealth-action flavour, and your AI companions were to be used to “deploy strategic attacks throughout the urban levels.” There was also a multiplayer component with “ninja clans.”

When Tiger Hill exited the picture on ShadowClan, Titan tried to find “a new director and talent” to replace Woo on the property, which the firm wanted to turn into a feature as well. But Titan was ultimately unable to get any further traction on ShadowClan.

John Woo’s “Ninja Gold”

The winding down of Tiger Hill, however, did not mean an end for John Woo’s interest in the gaming medium. Reuters reported in late May 2007 that Woo was collaborating with famed game designer Warren Spector and his studio Junction Point on a transmedia game and film property Ninja Gold. Reuters said Ninja Gold was focused on “a ninja warrior, [named Kat Sato], part of a centuries-old legacy and bloodline, forced to confront the reality of covert warfare in the modern world.” Terence Chang told the wire service the idea for the game came from real-life stories of the Yakuza and Russian mob involvement in gold theft in South Africa.

Spector told Reuters that Woo — who was very interested in pursuing “something involving traditional ninjas in a modern-day setting” — originated the idea, which piqued Spector’s interest. The game designer said he was attracted to “the idea of what happens when the traditional and the contemporary come into conflict.”

Spector indicated that Woo was deeply involved in the conception of the game’s characters, particularly Kat Sato, and early collaboration between the two would make Woo’s autonomous work on the film, which Spector was executive producing, far easier. The report made no mention of a publisher for the game, but the film project was set up at Fox’s short-lived genre-focused division Fox Atomic. Woo intended to direct the Ninja Gold film, and start production in 2008 following completion of a script.

Spector wanted to make a piece of ninja media that was smart — something giving ninjas the sort of gravitas Game of Thrones lends to fantasy.

On his then-active blog, Spector wrote in late June 2007 that one of his aims with Ninja Gold was to eschew the “juvenile manner” in which ninjas typically appear in fictional media. Spector wanted to make a piece of ninja media that was smart — something giving ninjas the sort of gravitas Game of Thrones lends to fantasy. He also referred to the project in past tense, indicating it might have already been cancelled in favour of Epic Mickey.

However, things began unravelling for both the game and film quickly after the report. Ninja Gold‘s publisher, rumored to be Vivendi, dropped the project when it cancelled its slate of unannounced titles. And not long after that, Disney acquired Spector’s Junction Point Studios in July 2007, causing the cancellation of the Ninja Gold game, which Junction Point had worked on for at least a year. Woo still tried to soldier ahead with the Ninja Gold film, but attempts to hire screenwriters were hobbled by the 2007 Writer’s Strike, and the project never moved forward.

While reflecting on Ninja Gold in a 2011 Eurogamer interview, the game’s writer Sheldon J. Pacotti suggested to the site that the game “could have moved the art of the branching narrative in games forward by a decade.” Pacotti said he wanted Ninja Gold‘s branching narrative to significantly change the game structurally — completely changing levels, mechanics and the game world itself. But there was some apprehension among the development team about the work and “expense” involved in making multiple versions of a single game map with significantly different environmental variables.

George A. Romero’s “City of the Dead”

Game designer American McGee posted on his blog in August 2004 that he — through his firm TMIEC — was collaborating with zombie film pioneer George A. Romero and Asylum Entertainment (not the Wes Craven game company) on a “new [game] concept” titled City of the Dead. McGee said they already had a developer “lined up,” and they were “in the process of shopping the interactive rights to games publishers.” He also said the game’s tagline was “the goriest game ever made,” and mentioned Romero was keen on involvement in the game’s development and marketing campaign.

In December, McGee’s firm helped broker a deal between Romero’s Living Dead Productions and publisher Hip Games for the George A. Romero series of games for PC and consoles, including City of the Dead.

Just prior to E3 2005, Hip Games officially announced City of the Dead for an early 2006 release, and confirmed the involvement of developer Kuju Entertainment and “horror icon Tom Savini.” Hip also revealed the game’s developer, Kuju Entertainment, and provided details about the game. City of the Dead was a shooter focusing on four survivors who exited a “zombie infested city by helicopter,” only to have their helicopter crash on an island infested with zombies. Additionally, players could choose whether they wanted to be a person or zombie in the game’s multiplayer.

City of the Dead was a shooter focusing on four survivors who exited a “zombie infested city by helicopter,” only to have their helicopter crash on an island infested with zombies.

E3 previews characterized City of the Dead as an ultraviolent, frantic and unpretentious arcade first-person shooter in which you could shoot a bunch of zombies. Writers did, however, make note of the game’s Burnout-inspired “one-shot” mode in which players lined up a shot in hopes of inflicting as much zombie damage as possible.

In July, a few months after E3, Hip Games publisher Hip Interactive filed for bankruptcy, throwing the publisher’s slate of titles — including City of the Dead — into limbo. Kuju confirmed in August that it was working with Hip’s receiver Ernst & Young to shop the game to publishers, but none ultimately picked up the game, and City of the Dead was cancelled.

Above: E3 2005 trailer for City of the Dead. Warning: Contains graphic zombie violence.

John Singleton’s “Fear & Respect”

In late September 2004, about a month prior to the release of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Midway announced Fear & Respect, a third-person action title that put players in the shoes of a “retired” gang member in South Central Los Angeles drawn back into the gang world after his release from prison.

The game, developed in partnership with Oscar-nominated writer-director John Singleton, was set for release on PlayStation 2 and Xbox in late 2005. The press release was scarce on details, and made no mention of a developer, leading some to erroneously conclude Midway was developing the game internally.

A few months later, Fear & Respect re-emerged as the subject of an eight-page Game Informer cover story, which revealed an assortment of details about the game. Singleton, a lifelong gamer, told the magazine that he worked with his agent for years “pitching games” to various publishers “around the world.”

Singleton had caught wind that “Midway was interested in doing a street game,” and met with the company to pitch several game ideas he had, including one that eventually became Fear & Respect. Shortly after he struck a deal with Midway for the game, Singleton brought on his longtime friend Snoop Dogg, who was apparently also in discussions with Midway for his own game, as a collaborator on Fear & Respect.

Working alongside Midway and developers Edge of Reality, Singleton hoped to channel his upbringing in South Central to create a realistic portrait of the community that transcended mere exploitation and meaningfully contextualized the game’s action. Singleton said he also wanted to use the game’s narrative as an opportunity to explore the causes and effects of urban violence, a common thread of Singleton’s earlier oeuvre that is almost entirely absent from gaming. Scott Lane, Midway’s executive producer for Fear & Respect suggested to Game Informer that he thought “Singleton’s presence [would] help blunt criticism of the game from all quarters, be it the residents of South Central or media watchdogs.”

The game’s narrative focused on the aforementioned retired gang member — Goldie (voiced by and visually based on Snoop Dogg), a South Central resident who has two strikes on his criminal record and faces a life sentence if he receives a third strike, as per California’s sentencing laws. Goldie genuinely wants to break from his criminal past, but as Game Informer explains, upon leaving prison, enemies he made inside jail “put out a hit on [Goldie].” And he gets further entangled “when his nephew gets in trouble,” according to an IGN interview. To help give insight into how Goldie developed into a gang member, Fear & Respect featured a number of flashback sequences showing seminal moments in his formative years, such as the murder of his father.

The game’s primary novelty was a so-called “Fear & Respect meter,” a sort of BioWare-esque moral binary game mechanic that Game Informer said “was conceived by Singleton himself.”

Fear & Respect was mostly a typical linear third-person action game with an emphasis on fists, gunplay and occasional stealth sequences, though producers wanted the game’s action to feel rough and realistic. There were also small quasi-sandbox hub areas Game Informer likened to an RPG village where players could interact with NPCs, choose side quests, and learn more story details.

The game’s primary novelty was a so-called “Fear & Respect meter,” a sort of BioWare-esque moral binary game mechanic that Game Informer said “was conceived by Singleton himself.” The actions players took at pivotal moments of the game (choosing whether to kill a particular character or not) determined whether one gained fear or respect. The amount of fear or respect you collected influenced other NPCs’ responses to you, as well the game’s overall narrative. Letting a rival live early on could have posed problems for Goldie later on in the game. And there were three endings depending on where the player ended up on the meter — a fear ending, a respect ending and a neutral ending.

Unfortunately for Midway, following the enormous success of San Andreas, Fear & Respect didn’t seem to quite strike a chord with the masses, and the presence of Singleton did not seem to make much of a difference. The game soon disappeared — Midway did not show it at E3 2005, and announced a delay to 2006 just prior to the trade show. In August, GameSpot reported the game was moved to next-gen consoles “as a result of Midway’s desire to make the game the AAA hit it believes it can be.”

In March 2006, then-Midway Games CEO David Zucker confirmed Fear & Respect‘s cancellation, but hinted that “[Midway was] still working with Snoop [Dogg] and John Singleton to do a game.” Of course, no other Singleton/Snoop Dogg/Midway projects ever came to fruition.

John McTiernan’s Mystery Action Stealth Game

In his early 2005 Hollywood Reporter article on Ubisoft’s collaborations with Hollywood, contributor John Gaudiosi mentioned Die Hard director John McTiernan “[was] working with Ubisoft Paris on a new action stealth game.” McTiernan told Gaudiosi that he wanted to “challenge” of working with a “team of developers because he was curious about the nature of the game business and how it worked”.

Gaudiosi wrote a Wired article several months later listing various director-gaming collaborations in the work, and identified the McTiernan project. Gaudiosi described the “untitled project” as “[a] heist caper game mixing action and stealth, set in contemporary Moscow,” and dated it for release sometime in 2006, which never came to pass.

In the piece, McTiernan also provided the following goofy quote:

The hero is not the protagonist in action movies, he’s the antagonist. The villain wants to change the world, and the hero just tries to stop him. And that’s exactly how video games are – they move forward based on your reactions to the villain’s actions.

A few years later, Gaudiosi mentioned briefly in a report that McTiernan had worked on Ubisoft’s stealth-action franchise Splinter Cell, which a source familiar with the McTiernan-Ubisoft collaboration said occurred following the cancellation of the original stealth title. The source said the McTiernan-Ubisoft project “kicked around [for] a while,” and likened it to an early heist-themed iteration of Pandemic’s Saboteur.

Tony Scott’s “Career Criminal”

In January 2005, Midway Austin began developing a project called Career Criminal (later known as just Criminal) with Kent Hudson on board as creative director. Harvey Smith, a long-time colleague who had recently joined Midway Austin, lured Hudson to work on the project.

Hudson said Career Criminal had already existed in the form of a hefty conceptual document circulating around at Midway, and he even heard another developer had previously created a prototype of the concept for Midway. That developer appears to be The Collective, who spent a year working on a considerably different, ultraviolent permutation of the concept (under the name “The Executives“) after the developer wrapped up work on their Xbox Buffy the Vampire Slayer game in summer 2002.

Criminal was an open-world crime game, but Hudson believes the game stood out from other titles in the genre because of the focus on virtualizing the experience of “being an intelligent criminal,” which entailed a greater emphasis on “elaborate heists” over the “low-level violence” often found in open-world games. “There were systems in place to discourage violence, and the game incorporated the kind of planning and meticulous execution you see in heist movies like [Michael Mann’s 1995 film] Heat,” Hudson said. He said the game also featured stealth elements — such as a lock picking mini-game — to allow for alternate approaches in executing heists. The player’s character worked with a crew to execute heists, and they could designate particular functions to their crew members.

Hudson mentioned Michael Mann’s crime epic as an initial major influence on the game’s design, and cited the “We’re here for the bank’s money, not your money!” scene when describing what he thought was the most unique feature from Criminal — the ability to use intimidation to control a crime scene without killing anyone. “[The player] would start a heist [in the game] with a big ‘Everybody get down!’ moment, and once people were on the floor you could go around with your gun and point it at individual people, yelling at them to stay down instead of killing them,” Hudson elaborated. However, NPCs you were trying to hold hostage would also try to escape out the door while you were looting items, so players had to balance their thievery with using intimidation to prevent hostages from escaping. And cops arriving on the scene at the conclusion of a heist triggered a chase sequence.

When scoping out a potential robbery target, the player’s character entered a location appearing to be normal customer, but then began attempting to ascertain the locations of security measures like alarm panels, security cameras and guards.

Hudson also detailed the game’s planning mechanics: when scoping out a potential robbery target, the player’s character entered a location appearing to be normal customer, but then began attempting to ascertain the locations of security measures like alarm panels, security cameras and guards. If the player did all of these successfully, they were much closer to flawlessly executing their heist.

Criminal also had the involvement of the late action auteur Tony Scott, who came on board a couple years into the game’s development. Hudson admitted he is not 100 per cent certain on the circumstances leading to their collaboration, but he recalled “someone in Midway marketing [having] a preexisting work relationship with [Tony Scott] and [floating] the idea [of working on Criminal] to Tony.” Hudson added that the team was excited about the prospect of the collaboration. as they were big fans of his work.

Hudson was saddened to hear of the director’s passing last year, and said he still cherishes the experience of collaborating with Scott. Although the ins and outs of game production were new to Scott, Hudson said the director was “really engaged with learning about new things” and demonstrated an insatiable curiosity about the development process. “[What] I remember most about him [is that] he was always energetic and happy, [and] always excited to talk about the creative process.

“We talked a lot about the differences in the creative process between movies and games, and we also talked about ways to draw from his movies,” Hudson added. “For example, in his later films [such as Man on Fire and Domino], he started putting text directly on the screen, and we played around with doing that in the game as well, specifically in the heist introduction scenes.”

Hudson characterised the collaboration with Scott as multifaceted: not only did Hudson’s team at Midway Austin work with Scott, but they also had access to his larger creative team, including a writer, Scott’s producing partner and creative collaborator Skip Chaisson, and photographer and visual consultant Gusmano Cesaretti. According to Hudson, Scott’s writer worked with the team on the game’s script; Chaisson, a martial arts buff, helped the team implement nonlethal mechanics and other “nuts and bolts” work; and Cesaretti sent massive amounts of visual materials of “real-life criminals and gangsters” curated with Scott’s help.

Although Criminal began as a Michael Mann-esque game inspired by Collateral and Heat, after Scott came onboard, Hudson said the team worked to integrate director’s sensibility throughout the project, and his touch was particularly evident in the game’s cinematic style. Hudson remembers the malleability in the creation of cutscenes as being as particularly epiphanic for Scott, who was accustomed to having to deal with careful choice of specific lighting, angles, and film stocks in live-action film.

After more than three-and-a-half years of work, a struggling Midway decided to cancel Criminal and make the game’s team largely redundant. When explaining the decision for the game’s cancellation, then-Midway CEO Matt Booty said he did not believe that Career Criminal had a decent chance of achieving success given the game’s “resource needs, feature set, schedule and financial profile.”

Hudson estimated that Criminal was “still at least a year from completion” at the time of its cancellation, and says the team “had done a fairly significant pass of refocusing the game and scoping it down in the months before [the game] was cancelled.” The team had been expecting an announcement sometime in 2008, but ultimately that never came.

Editor’s Note: Because Superannuation has dug up so many fascinating stories about failed Hollywood-gaming collaborations, Kotaku is presenting just the first half today. The second half, covering the gaming exploits of Guillermo Del Toro, Jerry Bruckheimer, Peter Jackson, Lars Von Trier and more, will be published next week.

Superannuation is a self-described “internet extraordinaire” residing somewhere in the Pacific timezone. He tweets and can be reached at heyheymayday AT gmail DOT com.

Read more Assorted Scoopery! Secrets lurk within.


  • I have to say….the George Romero one is the only game that sounded like it could be decent. Of course, by now the whole zombie thing has been beaten to death so it’s probably good it never happened.

    The biggest issue is just because you’re a successful in one area, that doesn’t mean your success will translate to a completely different field. See: Bruce Willis’ music career, Shaq’s acting career and George Lucas’ work in the field of fridge protector devices.

  • Why doesn’t Superannuation ever get his own byline? I thought the article was by Totilo until I got to the end. Give him some credit, Kotaku. He does good work.

  • I remember reading the 1up peice on LMNO… it sounds like a fantastic game that never quite was.
    If I recall correctly there were gameplay videos going around too…

Show more comments

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!