Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Mario Maker feels like a game that should not exist. Consider this: Nintendo is the sort of company that has specific ideas about the way Bowser would drink a cup of coffee in a movie. It is the sort of company that would develop a height graph, so game developers always know what size a character can be in relation to other creatures in the Mushroom Kingdom.

Nintendo is very particular about how it wants the world to consume its games, and this attention to detail is part of what makes Nintendo great. Nintendo is the Disney of the gaming world; a controlling, creative titan that creates beloved characters with shocking regularity.

Enter Super Mario Maker, a game about making Mario games. In it, people other than Nintendo are free to use official Mario iconography to create ridiculous levels, then cover those levels with dicks. Is Nintendo really just handing over their playbox and letting people loose with it? Can I seriously take Nintendo's most famous mascot and put him through a hellscape of my making…with Nintendo's blessing?

Well, OK then.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Mario Maker has two major components. There's the creation suite, which allows players to make their own levels. Then there's the play hub, where you can simply enjoy Mario Maker levels made by other people.

There, you will find the "10 Mario Challenge," a mode where you have ten lives to beat eight random levels made by Nintendo designers. While it may be tempting to jump into stage creation right away, I found that playing through the 10 Mario Challenge was a better idea, at least to start out.

Nintendo has made a point of creating short, punchy levels that defy the expectations they have set over their years making Mario games. It's a provocative mode that plays with the Mario formula, at once evoking nostalgia while also telling you to forget what what you think you know about Mario. This, in turn, encourages you to experiment beyond what you might think is possible in your own levels. The 10 Mario Challenge is instructive in the most hands-on way possible.

In one level, you might find an underground party when you go down a pipe. In a different level, you might find that the only thing that's standing between you and the flagpole is a stack of giant enemies crowned by Bowser, and you have to figure out a way to defeat them all without getting hit by a projectile.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

In another level, you might turn into a spring after ingesting a mushroom. Its the sort of thing that makes me wonder just what was stopping Nintendo from making levels that felt this fresh in the first place. This is Nintendo, letting its hair down — and the result is a game that feels exciting and new, even though yes, we've been stomping Goombas with our favourite plumber for over thirty (!) years now.

This sense of vitality is everywhere in Mario Maker, from the weird levels down to the vibrant menus. Mario Maker looks less like what you'd expect an official Mario game to look like, and more like a remix that could have been made by a studio like Crossy Road and Pac-Man 256-maker Hipster Whale. Even the some of the original sprites have been updated — they now have finer details that previously weren't there. What I'm saying is: Mario Maker looks hot as hell.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Let's talk about level creation. Ostensibly, this is the entire point of Mario Maker: to create stuff. This was somewhat of an awkward proposition for me, someone who struggles with open-ended creativity — I was the kid that didn't know what to do with Lego. I thought I wouldn't find much to like in the level-creation process, and instead wanted to use Mario Maker as a means to play stuff others create. But Mario Maker is so welcoming that I found myself happily experimenting with Koopas and question-mark blocks right away, eventually graduating to full-on levels that I was proud of.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Any element you might find in a 2D Mario game, you can just place on your level with a simple tap.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Anything that can occupy a large space can be placed and dragged and made longer. You can change the style of your level based on the different eras of Mario games across the years, from the original up to New Super Mario Bros U. Eventually, you'll even unlock special sound and visual effects that can add an extra layer of liveliness to your levels (I'm sure the community won't abuse this at all!) It's the most intuitive game creation tool I've ever used; it does for games what the point-and-click did for photography — only with way more spirit. When you place something down in a level, the level actually sings for you. Building an entire course sounds like harmony. In this sense, Mario Maker feels revolutionary. Even a kid could make a level with ease. Why aren't there more tools like this, but for other kinds of game?

The tools themselves hide wonderful secrets. Shake a green Koopa, and it will turn into a red Koopa. Shake a Lakitu, and you'll be left with its cloud — which you can actually ride. Add a mushroom to an enemy, and it will grow larger. All of these components stay frozen them until you press "Play," at which point the level goes live and you can test out whatever you made. And if Mario dies during this testing phase, it simply reverts back to creation mode, which allows you to tweak as you see fit. I found myself swapping between the frozen and live mode frequently, as I felt out what made the most sense for that particular level.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

Part of the reason why Mario Maker feels so generous is that, by giving me this box of toys, Nintendo has given me a first-hand look at what makes Mario, well, Mario. It's given me a new appreciation for what they have created in the past, especially when I felt stumped as to how to make a level of mine pop. Even the O.G. 1-1 has a quiet brilliance that may not be immediately obvious until you break it down, square by square, and see the subtle ways in which Nintendo has been gently guiding us all along.

My biggest complaint about Mario Maker's tools is that you can't use them all from the outset. You only have access to a limited number of things at the start, and it takes nine days of actively creating levels for at least five minutes to unlock everything on offer. It's the most Nintendo thing ever, and they justify it by saying that this is their way of easing you into the tools. They want to make sure you understand every set of objects they have before actually letting you tinker with more advanced stuff. It makes a sort of sense, but it's still kind of annoying. This, in conjunction with the incredible number of costume unlocks, make Mario Maker feel like more than just a toolbox. It's game design, gamified. Level creation requires assets. You're going to need to work for those assets, if not purchase a few Amiibo.

Once you build a level, you can save it to your system or upload it to the web. Before you can share it with others, you have to actually beat your course — which means you can't make anything impossible, or beyond your own skills. I appreciate this reality check, because it means that online levels can't get too out of hand.

From there, you wait. You'll be notified whenever someone plays your level, or leaves a comment on it.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

You can also get a sense of how difficult your course is based on completion percentages, or by taking a look at where on your course people have died. This information is also visible when you zoom in on other people's courses, too.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

This level is way harder than I intended — barely anyone can beat it!

Nintendo has basically built a mini social network just for Mario Maker called "Course World." Through it, you can check out a variety of different courses people have uploaded, all sorted into different categories. There's the "Featured" tab, which is front and center.

Super Mario Maker: The Kotaku Review

I'm not 100% clear on how Nintendo picks these courses, or if they're automated, but either way, the courses that become featured are the most visible courses in Mario Maker. That is where you want your courses to end up, which also means you have to deal with creating something palatable to other people. You have to pick a good name, and have a good concept, to facilitate being noticed — otherwise, nobody will play your stuff. This, I assume, will be a point of tension for some players who don't have some marketing savvy.

My version of Mario Maker only connects with people who have the game early. There are a very limited number of people online right now, likely microscopic in comparison to what the actual community will be like. Still, it's obvious that Mario Maker, like all social media, will have its share of politics. There are already people who come up with cool ideas that gain traction, only to be aped by other hopefuls who then end up gaining more visibility — the Fat Jews of Mario Maker, essentially. There are already people who create levels based on well-known franchises, and end up piggy-backing on that success even if their course isn't particularly good. There already are trends and fads, like courses that play themselves. I predict there will also be creators who become popular and known within the community, only to become scorned because they're too visible — or at least, I found myself annoyed at times that certain names seemed to be everywhere on Mario Maker's social hub. I have a feeling the online Course World is going to be a fascinating place once Mario Maker actually releases.

If you see a course that you like on your Course World feed, you can download it for future use/tweaking, or you can "star" it. Stars function similarly to Likes on Facebook, in that the more stars a course has, the higher they will show up on the "Star Ranking" tab on Course World. And the more people who play and like your levels, the more courses you can upload. You can also follow specific people through Course World, and the game will notify you whenever those people make new stuff. It's a system that rewards popularity, but I'm hoping that the game still leaves room for less conventional Mario levels too. It's hard to say just yet.

As for what you'll find online, well, you get a little bit of everything. If you try the 100 Mario Challenge, you'll get a grab bag of levels, some of which are really creative, some of which are clearly just someone fucking around. Personally, I liked messing with easy and normal mode the best — I found that these types of courses were more likely to try something creative or fun. Some of my favourites include...

A Donkey Kong themed level:

A level with Metroid-Like progression:

Video: a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrlX4M_xwZSNwG0WFHI1wKw">Pixelkabinett

A schmup:

Video: GameXplain

Roller-coaster type levels:

And this troll level:

Then there's expert mode. I'm sure that Mario connoisseurs will love this offering, and that there will be a variety of absurd Kaizo-Level courses in no time. My issue is that many of the expert courses I came across didn't really ramp up and ease you into the difficulty, nor do courses typically teach you how to play them at that level. Many of them kind of slap you in the face from the get go, or appear to be going for difficulty for the sake of difficulty. There is no palpable sense of design or purpose beyond stripped-down game-designer sadism.

[An example of the sort of fucked-up stuff you can expect from arsehole Mario Maker creators, courtesy of Jeffrey Grubb]

It's here that the biggest "flaw" of Mario Maker comes through: lots of people simply do not have that je ne sais quoi, that classic Nintendo touch. Mario levels are so memorable because Nintendo puts effort into making sure levels can be enjoyed both by beginners and experts. Levels they create go through an intense iterative process that puts function and design above all else. Miyamoto has been known to playtest games by watching people's expressions while they play games, to get an honest reaction to a level. I don't know if this feeling can be taught, exactly — there are interviews where Miyamoto says he bases design based on "what feels good instinctively," and has even expressed that sometimes, this sixth sense is difficult to describe to the staff at Nintendo. It's just the sort of thing that he knows when he sees it. Sometimes, exceptional design simply cannot be captured in words; it can merely be observed and felt.

Through years of experience, Nintendo has developed a good system that can eventually carve out the finest platformers around. Mario Maker tries to guide you via tips and sample levels, but there is only so much that it can pass on to its players. The only real thing you can do is make what you want, send it off into the void, and hope for the best. It's that rawness that separates Mario Maker from core Mario games — and what makes Mario Maker so interesting in the first place. The "flaw" isn't really a flaw at all. Mario Maker is the embodiment of play, and play cannot always be wrangled or parceled for consumption. It can be messy, and weird, a and far too difficult, placing a tower of giant Bowsers in your path just because it can.

I keep coming back to the idea that Mario Maker shouldn't exist. It gleefully flies in the face of Nintendo's controlling nature, and gives players the means with which to theoretically render every subsequent 2D Mario game obsolete. But Mario Maker is also a sign of Nintendo's confidence. The world will never stop wanting that special Nintendo magic, and Nintendo knows that. Nintendo just want to give us a chance to make our own fun for a change and, in the process, learn to understand what they do a little better.

Mario Maker is Nintendo going, Hey kid. You've seen what we can do. What about you?


Comments

    I laughed out loud at the negative point part of the summary. Most people are talentless hacks who couldn't make a good Mario level to save their lives. Myself included.

    Last edited 03/09/15 12:05 pm

      It's like saying having bad players on your team make Counter Strike shitty.

      Last edited 03/09/15 12:23 pm

    Who would have preferred a real WiiU Mario game in the vein on Galaxy, Sunshine or 64?

    Oh that’s right… everyone.

      Speak fo yo self my man foggy

        Really? If they had a brand new, Super Mario < Something Innovative > for the WiiU in the vein of the major, console defining Mario releases you saw on every Nintendo console until this one (Super Mario World, Mario 64, Sunshine, Galaxy), you’re honestly telling me you’d rather have a 2D level maker to accompany the barrage of high quality 2D platformers already available?

        Last edited 03/09/15 4:07 pm

      We had that already. It's called Super Mario 3D World, and it was excellent.

        No. Just no. That game is kinda fun, but it's not a proper 3D Mario.

        The spinnoff of the 3DS game?
        Yeah it’s good, but it’s not really a proper evolution of the Mario series or a WiiU defining title, is it?
        It’s not a 64, Sunshine or Galaxy, let’s put it that way.

        Look, each to their own as always, but I don’t see how Nintendo expects to sell WiiU’s when the big title for the back half (or all of) 2015 is a good (as Nintendo products always are) Mario themed version of the creative half of Little Big Planet, or a less flexible version of the Trials creation tools.

        It’s not bad, but it’s a standalone level maker for the only genre of game that’s over (or even adequately) represented on the WiiU.

          That's because the big game of the back end of 2015 isn't Super Mario Maker, it's Star Fox Zero. HYPE TRAIN GO!

          Also I'd totally put 3D World way above Galaxy. So much more memorable and enjoyable than either of those games.

            Hehe, I loved StarFox 15+ years ago…. I don’t know that the formula screams “AAA Blockbuster” in 2015 though.
            We’ll see, correct me if I’m wrong but Shiggsy himself once said that it was a difficult genre to innovate in and from what I’ve seen aside from the controller that’s the case? He may have been talking about both Starfox and F-Zero at the same time.

            You REALLY thought 3D World was more memorable than Galaxy?
            Galaxy was brilliant! It was also distinctly unique (apart from the also brilliant sequel).

            Super Mario 3D World was the fastest way they could make a 3D Mario and get it onto the WiiU so that they could tick a box and go back to pumping out more 2D-friggen-platformers. That’s not to say it was bad, but it’s clearly an adaptation of an existing 3DS title in both name and design.

      Would I like a follow up to Galaxy or Sunshine? Sure! Would I like it to replace this? Not a chance! Everyone already whines about "another" Mario game as it is. This is one of those games that only comes along once in a lifetime, looks fun as hell and has a bucket load of replay value.

      Honestly I cant wait to just sit back on a lazy day and hammer out a few levels and have some fun, play with the costumes etc. They can save the next Mario game for the NX. While at it, for the love of god port this to the NX too!

    This game would have been perfect at the start of the Wii Us life cycle. But several years on, as polished as this package is, I think people have been waiting for a bit more. A Wii U equivalent to Galaxy, or a new Metroid Prime would be great. For me, this game makes me go "heh, this is cool", but what I really want is something that 'wows' me. So I'll be passing on this.

      Man I wrote the exact same thing above (but with clever sarcasm as a bonus) and I got four downvotes!

      If people can look me right in the eye and tell me they wouldn’t trade this game AND 2 other WiiU, 1st party 2D platformers (there'll still be plenty to play) for a brand new 3D evolution in the Mario, Zelda or Metroid series….. f*ck that person, they’re a straight up liar.

      Last edited 03/09/15 2:21 pm

        I thought it was pretty crazy as well. I didn't realise people seriously preferred the 2D ones over the 3D ones. I always thought they were the cost effective money maker versions of Mario that Nintendo made whenever their bottom line needed a boost.

    This was somewhat of an awkward proposition for me, someone who struggles with open-ended creativity — I was the kid that didn’t know what to do with Lego. I thought I wouldn’t find much to like in the level-creation process, and instead wanted to use Mario Maker as a means to play stuff others create.This is exactly how I was feeling about this game. But reading this, I'm getting kinda excited about it now.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now