Mark Li is a freelance artist from China. Loving the silhouette on this fighter design.
You can see more of Mark’s work at his ArtStation page.
[clear] [clear]
[clear] [clear]
[clear] [clear]
[clear] [clear]
[clear] [clear]
[clear] [clear]
See Games Differently
Now you can get the top stories from Kotaku delivered to your inbox. Enter your email below.
By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Comments
5 responses to “Do Future Fighter Jets Really Need Camo?”
“Aircraft camouflage is the use of camouflage, typically in the form of light and color patterns, applied to military aircraft to make them more difficult to see on the ground, in the air, or to make their speed, distance or attitude harder to determine.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_camouflage
Most military aircraft are destroyed when they’re on the ground, which is why most camouflage on fighter jets are ground type patterns (when they have it).
Camo is still needed, nothing really stops a Mk1 Eyeball from seeing you
It’ll make it easier to distinguish between military and civilian planes.
The camo is used for reducing visibility when on the ground, say satellite spying. In the sky the only camo that is needed (for the most part) is radar camo.