The New Stellaris Update Can't Fix A Boring Game

The New Stellaris Update Can't Fix A Boring Game

Stellaris didn't launch as a bad game, just a game that hadn't figured out what it was. While the new Heinlein patch helps Stellaris become more coherent, it still doesn't quite work.

There's a host of small improvements that do make the game easier to parse. When you're beefing up your military, the ships fly over to your rally point, and instead of creating 3rd, 4th, and 5th fleets you have to manually merge. Information on how much influence is needed to colonize a nearby planet is now contained in a menu, which saves players from building an unnecessary colony ship. These changes were sorely needed: when a larger empire is kissing your borders and mounting an army, you don't want to wonder where the hell all your ships are.

But these elements are so small and so basic that I couldn't help but wonder why they weren't present to begin with. It's nice that the ships have all been balanced so that each type is necessary in a fleet, but why haven't they always been that way? It's really good that Alliances have been removed in favour of Federations, but the two mechanics were always redundant. The changes are all necessary but they seem like no brainers.

I hate these birds.

What's most frustrating is that Diplomacy, which has always been a muddle, still doesn't feel as dynamic or exciting as it does in other 4X games like Civilisation or Paradox's own Crusader Kings II. While Stellaris has never sought to be a complex or esoteric game, that lack of complication means that the interesting and hilarious stories that define the genre just don't happen.

Because Diplomacy is still so dependent on the ethics you roll, it makes relationships between empires feel stagnant and predictable. If your ethics match, you'll get along fine. You'll still never be able to have any kind of relationship with Xenophobes, and Peaceful empires will always clash with Militaristic ones. There's nothing unexpected about Stellaris, which makes different playthroughs with different kinds of races all blur together, even with the latest update. You can make other empires that like you like you more, or empires that hate you really hate you, but there's never any surprise. Crusader Kings II could shock you by catching your son in a plot to have you assassinated or having relationships with other nations change wildly, but when you make first contact with a new empire in Stellaris you pretty much know how it's going to go.

Stellaris is meant to be approachable to people newer to the genre, but smoothing those edges has made the game uninteresting. Until Paradox can find a way to add that complication back in, Stellaris will still feel like a chore to play.

There's so much potential in Stellaris to be a good game that sometimes it's easy to overlook how it doesn't come together. But it just doesn't. The changes made in the Heinlein patch are all good ones, but the update doesn't add what the game needs. Stellaris needs to feel alive, and instead it continues to be a spreadsheet with nice UI.


Comments

    I'm surprised they the people behind some great grand strategy games couldn't make a space grand strategy fun.

    So you're lamenting that the game isn't the same as the other games that Paradox have made, and you whine that the changes they have made to the game should have been there from the beginning. So would you have preferred that the patch had never occurred? Would it be better or worse for the game without those so called "no brainers" you've spend half the article talking about and dismissing? Not a great article for what should be a positive update and perhaps a request for more changes. Instead you pine for the game to be the same as CKII in space which is just not what this is about...

    EDIT: Just saw who the author was and considering one of their shining examples of an 'article' was the rimworld piece below... I'm not really surprised...

    http://www.kotaku.com.au/2016/08/how-my-colonists-died-in-rimworld-ranked-from-least-to-most-depressing/

    Last edited 26/10/16 2:27 pm

    I agree. Minor interface improvements can't fix the fact that the game was heavily sold on its (claimed) dynamic events and story engine - how each play was supposedly going to be completely different. Instead, what we got was another bog standard, personality free space 4X taking place in a lifeless galaxy. It's going to take a hell of a lot more than drip feeding overpriced paid story DLC to fix things.

    That's because they want you to pay for the boring to go away, as exemplified by the ever delayed patch 1.2 free mid game event update and the release of the paid for leviathans story dlc.

    and civilisation is boring because the space program = waiting for a huge number of terms for the builds to finish and nothing else is happening. - in which 99% of the time you will be waiting for the AI to play their turn.

    civilisation is as chore like as its going to get.

    AI thinks troops 3 squares inside my border garrisoned inside my city is on their border. randomly declares wars - when relationship modifiers shows nothing of the sort. and since the dev seems to like the term warmongers so much that its now specially set aside as an attribute, Im inclined to refer to the game as Warmongers 6.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now