Zynga Co-Founder Wants To Make American Politics More Like FarmVille 

Do you remember Mark Pincus? He co-founded Zynga and led the burgeoning online games company as CEO until 2013 when he was replaced by then czar of Xbox entertainment, Don Mattrick. After returning to the company for a short stint in 2015, Pincus now has a new pet project: making the Democratic Party more like a Zynga game.

The tech entrepreneur has decided to apply his business acumen and games expertise to politics, announcing an imitative called "Win the Future" (also called WTF — get it?) through which he and the creator of LinkedIn, Reid Hoffman, will try to "aggregate our voices and money around the issues that we want to top our government's agenda."

At the start at least, that means crowdfunding billboard displays and having people vote through social media on which political messages they want them to display. Because if there's one takeaway from the Democrats' failure last November, it's that they didn't have enough billboards.

Pincus tried to explain the project to Recode by comparing it to the video game industry a decade ago. "Gaming in 2007, believe it or not, was a declining industry, and no one saw it as a big growth area," he said in an interview with the tech site. "And my insight [was] that the biggest reason it was declining is that it was serving the hardcore gamer, and gaming was getting more complex and expensive."

The 2020 Democratic road to the White House goes through this place.

As the co-founder of an empire built on the Facebook equivalent of slot machines put it, video games weren't doing enough to appeal to a mainstream audience. He pointed to the Xbox controller as a prime example, telling Recode it hadn't changed enough.

According to this analogy, Congress is the Xbox controller and the tech gurus behind two of the Internet's most stale and disheartening ventures are the ones to remake it into something everyone can hop on board with. A Wiimote perhaps?

On the surface, it's easy to share WTF's broad sentiment around opening politics up to more people using the Internet, just like it's easy to agree with a critique of mid-aughts gaming as too insular, testosterone-addled, and obsessed with abrasive, AAA bombast.

But the answer to that was not FarmVille, or the plethora of other surface level games that took off around the turn of the decade. Give me Journey, Gone Home, or Inside over CityVille Hometown any day. While Zynga was able to open up gaming to other demographics, it never got around to giving them something really worth playing. Zynga's stock shares peeked at close to $US15 ($20) in 2012 the year it went public. Now they are about a quarter of that. If you like the company's brand of colourful clickers, that's perfectly fine, but it is not a model for empowering society's downtrodden to accomplish concrete and equitable changes to the status quo.

Just as I am willing to bet that the answer to the Democratic Party's current problems is not to try and replace California Sen. Dianne Feinstein with Stephan Jenkins. That's right. Outside of tweets and billboards, Pincus' vision for a new politics is to send the front man of Third Eye Blind to D.C.

That's not really surprising coming from the co-founder of Zynga though. After all, Jenkins waffly political views would be easy to situate inside WTF's incoherent ideology of of "pro-social [and] pro-planet, but also pro-business and pro-economy." Pincus wants to remake the Xbox controller to save the planet from President Trump, but not at the risk of alienating the billionaire class he hails from. Here's a brief but not exhaustive refresher on Pincus' good deeds over the last decade.


    A quick reminder that everything about American politics is insane.
    Not a side, not a party, the whole damn thing is bat shit crazy.

      It's fitting, because so are scumbag companies like Zynga and King.

      Also, this guy is egotistical as fuck:

      Gaming in 2007, believe it or not, was a declining industry, and no one saw it as a big growth area. And my insight [was] that the biggest reason it was declining is that it was serving the hardcore gamer, and gaming was getting more complex and expensive.

      No it wasn't. There was always positive growth, which was lower in 2003 and 2004 because of the US recession. It picked up again in 2005 and 2006 onwards skyrocketed. Zynga didn't "make gaming accessible to casual players", it wilfully targeted less experienced players with exploitative business models that ended up forcing them to pay far more for far less just to be able to play these substandard games without running into artificial time limits.

      This guy seriously thinks he was instrumental in cold-starting the casual gaming market. What a fucktard.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now