The European Commission paid €360,000 ($541,980) for a study on how piracy impacts the sales of copyrighted music, books, video games and movies. But the EU never shared the report — possibly because it determined that there is no evidence that piracy is a major problem.
Image: Getty
The Dutch firm Ecory was commissioned to research the impact of piracy for several months, eventually submitting a 304-page report to the EU in May 2015.
The report concluded that: "In general, the results do not show robust statistical evidence of displacement of sales by online copyright infringements. That does not necessarily mean that piracy has no effect but only that the statistical analysis does not prove with sufficient reliability that there is an effect."
The report found that illegal downloads and streams can actually boost legal sales of games, according to the report.
The only negative link the report found was with major blockbuster films: "The results show a displacement rate of 40 per cent which means that for every ten recent top films watched illegally, four fewer films are consumed legally."
The study has only come to light now because Julia Reda, a Member of the European Parliament representing the German Pirate Party, posted the report on her personal blog after she got ahold of a copy through an EU Freedom of Information access to document request.
What the @EU_Commission found out about #copyright infringement but ‘forgot’ to tell us https://t.co/Sxshdxy3KZ pic.twitter.com/Vk4Q74k1Hv
— Julia Reda (@Senficon) September 20, 2017
The European Digital Rights organisation suggested in a blog post that the full contents of this report were intentionally suppressed, pointing to a 2016 academic paper by two Commission officials. The paper, "Movie Piracy and Displaced Sales in Europe", only mentioned the part of the Ecory report that highlights the relationship between piracy and blockbuster film lost sales, and excluded the other findings of the report.
Additionally, the paper didn't even disclose that the cited information came from Ecory's study.
Comments
No interest in the facts, only an interest in perpetuating the broken status quo for as long as possible. If reality doesn't conform to your business models, just slap your hands on your ears and shout "LALALA I'M NOT LISTENING LALALA".
So in short, business as usual for politicians.
I am shocked and appalled.
(not really)
Cause supressing unfavourable reports worked so well... for anyone who ever supressed information. It will turn up sooner or later under Freedom of Information.
The EU has long clearly worked in favor of corporate interests, I don't even think it is much of a stretch to think that the main reason Brussels keeps the open border policy is that it will give them a source of cheap labour for decades to come while also allowing them to claim that it was massive humanitarian push.
off course it was, it runs counter to the common mantra of 1 download = 1 lost sale
not that it ever made sense to anybody with an ounce of grey matter
You wouldn't suppress a study...
You wouldn't suppress a study and then steal its baby.
Join the discussion!
Comment Voting
Up Votes
Down Votes
Only logged in users may vote for comments!
Please log in or register to gain access to this feature.
Get Permalink