The New Tomb Raider Movie Is Nothing Special

Screenshot: Warner Bros.

The new Tomb Raider movie is out today, and it certainly was a movie about raiding a tomb. Heather Alexandra and I sat down to chat about the good, the bad, but mostly the very bland.

Gita Jackson: Hi Heather! Last night we saw Tomb Raider. That Lara sure raided a tomb, didn't she?

Heather Alexandra: She raided at least one very large tomb.

Gita: I don't know that I actively dislike this movie. I also did not actively like it. You had a more negative reaction, at least initially.

Heather: Right. It's good to get that off our chests right away. Tomb Raider isn't necessarily a bad movie. There's some tense action set pieces, and Alicia Vikander's take on Lara Croft is pretty good. For me, the problem is that it felt too generic. Plot points were rushed, and I never got to really care about the characters. It's a fine popcorn munching movie, though!

Gita: I don't think that I would willingly put this movie on again, but if it were on television while I was folding laundry, I would maybe continue to watch it. Unfortunately, at no point does a single character say "Yer a Croft, Lara!"

Heather: A huge disappointment considering how much of this movie is about Lara and her father. Let's recap for folks who might not be in the know: Tomb Raider is mostly about Lara searching for what happened to her missing pops. She ends up on an island called Yamatai where a nefarious group of mercenaries are looking for the tomb of a freak death goddess called Himiko. Hilarity ensues.

Gita: One short note about Himiko and Yamatai - Himiko was an actual shaman queen who shows up in some ancient Chinese texts about ancient Japan who ruled over a place called Yamatai. So far so good. However, Tomb Raider cites her as "the first empress of Japan" who dealt "death and destruction wherever she went" and was imprisoned by her own army.

All of that stuff is made up! Also, in this movie, Yamatai is an island out in the middle of nowhere, whereas in real life no one really know where Yamatai was, but the two locations people assume it to be are just islands of Japan. These legends obviously don't have to be historically accurate - this is a movie about tomb raidin' - but, uh, maybe they should have thought about this just a smidge more.

Heather: That ties into something we talked about last night. While the movie manages to hit some key beats from the games - a tumble down river rapids, a muddy and horrible fight against a guard - it doesn't really get into the actual tomb raiding until much later. When it does, Lara mostly solves puzzles without ever letting the audience in on it.

Gita: I really liked that she didn't solve puzzles on screen. There is nothing more boring than watching someone dictate the steps of a puzzle slowly and loudly. Like, have you ever seen a Saw movie? Later, when Lara does actually do a puzzle and tell us all the steps, it was tedious and boring.

Screenshot: Warner Bros.

Heather: Indiana Jones this is not.

Gita: By far the most interesting parts of this movie were watching Lara physically struggle or emotionally struggle. There's a lot of the former and not a lot of the latter.

Heather: While I don't know if I care about Lara Croft the reckless pseudo-gajillionaire, I did at least feel a little for Lara Croft the tough girl in way over her head. It's not much, but the movie does sneak in some moments for her to really grow.

Gita: Very soon after Lara ventures to the island of Yamatai, she gets kidnapped and then basically does the whole "falling down a river sequence" from the first game of the rebooted franchise. She really gets the shit beaten out of her by nature here. She almost falls off a cliff and gets partially impaled by a stick - it's bad.

Just when you think it can't get worse, a man tries to kill her. She ends up winning this fight by drowning him in a shallow pool.

What I really liked about that sequence is that of all the things that happened to her, you can really see the exhaustion and pain on her face after she murders someone. Very few movies like this reflect for even a moment on what a person goes through when they realise they have killed someone. Unfortunately that moment of reflection is incredibly short-lived because she sees her not-dead-after-all dad in the distance.

Screenshot: Warner Bros.

Heather: That fight scene's probably the best moment in the movie. Vikander really sells the physicality of it all. It never gets quite into the "boy, we love punching this girl" weirdness of the games. It's a quick beat but it works really well.

Gita: I didn't really expect Vikander to sell taking a punch as well as she does, but she's great at it. I'd watch her in another action movie in a heartbeat. Just maybe not this one.

Heather: Yeah, they definitely nailed the casting for Lara. Everyone else? Not so much. I always associate Walton Goggins with yokel henchmen types, so I didn't quite buy him as a villain. While I liked Dominic West, the whole Benn Gunn routine felt a bit forced.

Gita: Neither Vikander or West really sold the father/daughter relationship for me. They tried really hard, but I felt like it just wasn't that deep.

Heather: Gita, they had a sort of secret hand gesture. If that's not grounds for a strong father/daughter relationship, I don't know what is.

Gita: Oh my god, you know what that reminded me of? Face/Off.

Screenshot: Warner Bros.

Heather: A movie with many people using two guns at once! In Tomb Raider, Lara doesn't do that until the end. Which was a nice nod because it felt a bit more like Angelina Jolie for a second.

Gita: You saw the Angelina Jolie movie, right? What's that like?

Heather: There are a fair amount of similarities. There's a relationship with her dad, a secret organisation - the Illuminati in those movies. But there's a bit more globe trotting and sillier action.

Gita: Yeah, this movie is mostly confined to the one place. The structure of it feels less like an Indiana Jones movie than a movie version of a video game that is modelled after Indiana Jones, which is actually just what it is. Every new set piece looked like a new level to play. It's like an advertisement for an Uncharted game.

Heather: It definitely moves from one defined thing to another. The gunfight level, the climbing set piece, the tomb.

Gita: When Lara is on the boat to Yamatai, she reads her dad's diary and hears his voice in voiceover telling her that in order to make it to the tomb of Himiko she must complete some trials. She must survive the chasm of souls, pray to survive the faces of Himiko and face her army of a thousand handmaidens. It was like "Here's a level of a video game, and here's another level and here's another level."

Screenshot: Warner Bros.

Heather: The script definitely feels like it was chasing after video games a bit too much, although it does manage to hold back a bit once we get into the tomb. I wanted undead skeletons, Gita! All we got were sort of zombies.

Gita: God ok, this super bothered me. So the above stuff that I mentioned? Lara, her dad and the guy from the evil organisation all survive that. Worth noting that the faces of Himiko thing is the puzzle she has to solve on screen, which requires Alicia Vikander to dramatically say the word "Green!" Just awful. Anyway, they make it to the tomb, they raid it, and discover it's not magical. There aren't any zombies; Himiko was a carrier for an infectious disease. Nothing mystical in this movie, y'all! Except this disease is not fundamentally any different from magic. It's a still active virus that necrotizes tissue and presents rabies-esque symptoms but is somehow only communicable through touch. And progression of the disease can be temporarily halted by use of a tourniquet. Tell me how that isn't just magic!

Heather: Uh... science. You're right, though. They make a big fuss about magic or reality, about Lara's dad becoming obsessed with the afterlife and searching for proof of the supernatural, and it really just boils down to smallpox.

Gita: Just let it be magic. So many unlikely things have happened to Lara at this point — we can have some zombies.

Heather: I think this movie struggles a lot to know what it wants to be. When it does hit those tough character beats it's pretty rad, but otherwise it feels a bit like it moves from one thing to another without much consequence or concern. I mean, we've not even talked about Lu Ren for instance. He's just...there. The corpse disease is just...there. The secret Trinity organisation is just...there. It never comes together.

Screenshot: Warner Bros.

Gita: Daniel Wu is fantastic as Lu Ren, and he doesn't really get a lot to do. I looked him up after the movie and apparently this guy is a Chinese action star who currently stars in a martial arts show in the US. Seems like kind of missed opportunity, especially given how charismatic he was on screen.

Heather: Yeah, it's a bummer. I liked him but they don't really build up the bond between him and Lara besides a a little bit of flirting. He does, however, do something you thought was wonderful during the gunfight.

Gita: Oh right! In the most video game-y of video game moves, during a gunfight in the midpoint of the movie, he shoots an exploding barrel to incapacitate an enemy from a distance. Nice use of your environment, my dude!

Heather: Alas, I don't think we're going to get a Lu Ren movie. I'm not even sure we'll get another Tomb Raider. Our audience seemed split between getting into it and laughing at it. That's fine, it's cool to laugh at a corny movie, but I definitely walked away shaking my head. I did get to have nachos and chill with a friend though, so if folks need an excuse to do that, Tomb Raider might be a good choice.

Gita: There are worse excuses to hang with a friend or background noise for laundry folding, that's for sure.


Comments

    "The New Tomb Raider Movie Is Nothing Special"

    Shocker.

    God dammit, I had high hopes and low expectations.

    Even when they hand Hollywood something on a silver platter they somehow manage to kill it 99% of the time.

    The good: Alicia Vikander. Some of the set pieces. The stuff in London. Croft Manor.

    The ok: the story... but...

    The bad: Hannah John-Kamen was criminally underused. Also (actual plot discussion ahead):

    the changes from the game's story, binning the supernatural Himoko, the guardian samurai, the treacherous avaricious expedition leader and all Lara's companions from the game/comics. I didn't expect it to be exactly the same, but solving the mystery of what happened to Richard Croft and changing the curse to a disease turned what could have been a great Tomb Raider into a by-the-numbers predictable story.

    They just played it too safe.

    Still, as a safe starter to a new franchise, maybe they'll let it off the chain next time round.

    I thought it was perfectly fine, an enjoyable action-adventure film. It was never going to be a cinematic landmark and if you went in expecting something that was going to be Nominated for 11 Academy Awards or something then you deserved to be disappointed.

      I agree, I enjoyed the movie and thoroughly enjoyed the new take of Tomb Raider based on the games.

      Doesn't need to be a massive million dollar block buster, just a fun enjoyable movie which I believe it achieved, and I do look forward to seeing more.

        Same here, an enjoyable film that does not need to be a million dollar blockbuster.
        I guess these days everything gets compared to Marvel...

      But is it better than greatest-vg-movie-of-all Mario Bros?

        Define 'better'?

          Ha :P

          (I can't actually think of any way to define it other than "do I like it more than...")

    The problem with most of the critics who have reviewed this movie is they have reviewed it on the basis that its related to the Jolie era Movies. Its not, Its based on the games. Critics need to stop comparing this with the jolie movies. Its not trying to emulate those movies at all.

    I do t understand why everyone is praising Alicia Vikanderk’s performance in this. She has one facial expression, barely emotes at all, and for some reason changes ages in between shots. At some points, she looks 16, others somewhere in the 25-30 range. Her delivery of the dialogue is terrible.

    So please, enlighten me as to what I missed with this performance that everyone seems to be going crazy about.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now