If you had told me months ago that a city builder about the remnants of 19th century England trying to survive the next ice age would sell hundreds of thousands of copies in its first week on Steam, I’d have guessed you were hallucinating from hypothermia. But that’s exactly what Frostpunk did, and after spending all weekend with the game I’m not surprised.
Image: 11 Bit Studios (Frostpunk)
11 bit studios was previously best known for This War of Mine, a survival game based on the Siege of Sarajevo. In that game you tried to keep a tiny group of civilians alive by scavenging, making tough moral choices, and taking advantage of each character’s unique attributes.
Frostpunk is a more traditional strategy game, but it still features the moral pressures of This War of Mine. Instead of the bombardment of a city, the people you lead are a caravan of residents from late 19th century London looking to eke out some sort of existence under the warmth of a giant heat generator in the Arctic.
Temperatures across the globe are mysteriously dropping, and vast reservoirs of coal up North are humanity’s only hope of outlasting the deep freeze.
As the ruler of a small band of refugees under the harshest of environmental conditions, you’re always making tough choices. Do you feed the hungry first or heal the sick? Bury the dead in a cemetery or simply put them on ice for future use? Work your populace to the bone or allow them downtime to recoup and socialise?
Almost every goal in the game stands in tension with another, making it impossible to please everyone, let alone satisfy any particular moral code. For this reason Frostpunk doesn’t fall into a lot of the optimisation traps that make some other building sims feel too easy or just downright boring.
Instead, it does its best to make every choice sub-optimal and thus help you share in at least some of the discomfort of the residents of your settlement. “I sometimes wonder what the purpose of our struggle is,” your fellow refugees will occasionally say, and after you sacrifice just about everything to keep the settlement going, you’ll begin to wonder the same thing.
Screenshot: 11 Bit Studios (Frospunk)
In the beginning of a run, it’s enough just to collect resources such as coal, wood and steel from nearby wreckage or natural deposits. Later on it becomes important to reconstitute society from the ashes (icicles?) of Victorian England by adding children’s shelters, churches and fight houses. You may even eventually surpass London with your own army of labouring automatons.
Where some games let you build at your own pace or try to always reach a state of balance and equilibrium, Frostpunk‘s constantly dropping temperatures don’t leave you time to get things perfect.
Instead, every decision feels urgent and like a matter of life and death. Nothing’s worse than resting on your laurels thinking you’ve finally solved all your settlement’s problems only to see your coal reserves depleted in the middle of the night when a particularly bad cold snap hits.
The game also makes every bureaucratic decision feel emotionally weighty by giving everyone in your colony a name and face. When someone gets sick or begins to starve, it isn’t just some anonymous worker X, it’s Joe Maven or Jean Graham who has now bitten the dust and orphaned a few children thanks to your brutal decision making.
One more than one occasion I literally worked my people to death, not just so we could get the resources we needed to survive a few more days, but also so that there would be fewer of them to need to spend those resources on.
The game’s law system lets you invoke legal mandates every so many hours, such as 24-hour work days, all of which come with a mix of material advantages and drawbacks. The goal then becomes seeing how far you can push your society to the breaking point before it actually snaps. If you ever wanted to reenact Snowpiercer, Frostpunk is for you.
Other times the game doesn’t even allow you to choose whatever you think is the lesser of two evils. To underline how severely dystopian things had gotten, in one playthrough I actually had to let a child freeze to death to teach him a lesson. On a hunger strike in the cemetery, he said he’d only come back to the children’s shelter if I called a town meeting big enough that his mother would wake up, get out of bed, and come attend.
But she was dead, and if the only way for him to come to terms with that was to become a fossil, so be it. In Frostpunk there’s no time or extra resources to indulge in sentimental Hollywood moments such as these. You either become a tyrannical dictator, religious autocrat, or go to an early grave and take your colony with you.
To put it another way: Frostpunk is the kind of game where your hope meter actually rises when you build your first cemetery.
Comments
7 responses to “You Should Be Playing The Brutal City Builder Frostpunk”
It’s a beautifully crafted and polished game, but it’s worth keeping in mind that for now at least it’s linear and scripted, like This War of Mine was at release. Except for basically one major policy choice and a handful of minor ones, the scenarios play out like puzzles, the same each time. The temperature changes, the scouting locations, everything is scripted and there’s zero RNG involved.
That’s not to say it isn’t a fun game, but it severely hampers the game’s replayability at the moment. It really needs a sandbox or open-ended mode, moreso than TWoM did, and I’m disappointed it wasn’t there at launch after the lessons they learned with their last title.
Depending on how good you are at solving the problems presented by the scenarios, you’re probably looking at 8-10 hours of play to solve both scenarios and see all the policy choices. Worth keeping in mind when deciding to pick it up now or hold off a bit.
Agreed on all points but the devs have committed to more scenarios and a sandbox mode that I hope will have RNG. Worthwhile keeping an eye on at least.
Yeah. Don’t get me wrong, I like the game. My complaint is that there’s not enough of it, what’s there is over so quickly. More scenarios is a stopgap, sandbox is the real feature I want.
A city builder without sand box mode is a strange thing indeed.
I still have Sim City 4 on my PC.
Does killing someone qualify as teaching them a lesson? I mean, sure, he (literally) won’t do that again, but I’m not sure there’s a lesson being learnt as part of that deal.
On the other hand, killing someone to teach everyone else a lesson is an excellent strategy. i.e. The “You’re next” approach to diplomacy.
This autumn has been so hot Frostpunk has been a comforting game to play.
4 hour campaign and no sandbox mode.
So how does it compare to ‘They Are Billions’. Because that looked like fun too, but it’s super hard. For me, anyway, not using any guides. (And quite possibly being retarded)