Amazon Temporarily Sells Pirated Copies Of Popular PC Games

Amazon Temporarily Sells Pirated Copies Of Popular PC Games

Over the weekend, people shopping on Amazon thought they’d hit the jackpot: Popular recent PC games such as Frostpunk and Surviving Mars for the price of a cup of coffee. Problem: These copies were pirated.

Word of the dubious deals first got out in a Reddit thread on Sunday.

“I think this is a screw up from them [Amazon], I dunno if someone wants to try it though,” read the thread, which linked to a $US2.99 ($4) copy of Frostpunk whose seller was listed as Amazon Digital Services. The ice-encrusted management game usually sells for $US29.99 ($40).

Other users surfaced similar listings, such as Surviving Mars — which usually goes for $US39.99 ($54) — for $US3.99 ($5).

One user, CodependentlyWealthy, did some sleuthing.

“I decided to pay $3 to play detective,” they said of Frostpunk. “It’s piracy. Someone took the GOG version of the game, repackaged it with their [sic] own installer signed and published by ‘Ace Media Group LLC’ and submitted it to Amazon. The installer looks fairly legit but the uninstaller doesn’t work. They left GOG-specific metadata files and Galaxy64.dll (for GOG Galaxy client integration) in the install dir.”

GOG is a PC gaming platform whose greatest claim to fame is its lack of DRM. On one hand, it’s nice to be able to purchase games sans invasive software riding in the passenger seat, but it leaves wiggle room for exploitation.

In this case, it seems that the pirates took GOG copies of games, added their own custom installer, and claimed them as their own.

Users reviews of these game listings include similar claims. The offers are no marked as “currently unavailable” and can no longer be purchased. Surviving Mars’ developers, meanwhile, took to Twitter to address the issue:

“This is not a sale we’ve approved and we’re suspect of the legality of it,” they wrote. “We can confirm that no updates will work with it and we’d advise steering clear of it.”

Amazon, so far, has said nothing, though some users have reported managing to get refunds. Kotaku reached out to Amazon for comment, but as of writing, the ethically questionable inventor of fake holidays had yet to respond.

Posters on gaming message board Resetera point out that Amazon has failed to police video game listings before. Last October, fantasy RPG Lords of Xulima popped up on the all-consuming mega-store for $US1.99 ($3). At the time, the game’s developer said it was trying to get the listing removed, but Amazon’s demands made that difficult.

“We are trying to remove that seller, but Amazon seems to require lots of documents from us,” Xulima developer Numantian Games wrote in its Steam forum. “It seems that you can sell a pirated game without any problem, but if the owners complain about it, they have to present a lot of very complex documents. What a shame.”


  • Is it just me, or are we seeing the early beginnings of Amazon’s downfall?

    Even if business continues, it looks to me trust in the service is falling.

    • Can’t say I’ve ever had a problem with them, this is the first story of an actual problem I’ve seen really. They’re also the best cloud provider by a good margin at the moment, and that’s an enormous revenue stream for them.

      • They’re also the best cloud provider by a good margin

        I can’t believe I forgot that. When I hear Amazon I still think of their original business of selling goods online.

        Not to get too far off topic though, one can also say EC2 is one of the true examples of a cloud. Other offerings are just re-badged clusters and were major contributors to the term cloud becoming a buzzword.

      • Sorry, I meant to add this in my first reply.

        Thanks for the reminder. This is more embarrassing than anything else as my background is cloud computing research so I have no excuse to ever forget EC2 (and it’s older sibling, S3)

        • Haha, all good man. It’s understandable to mentally separate their two businesses, they’re quite different from each other. The only reason their cloud business even existed was to offset the cost of their own hardware distribution.

          • The only reason their cloud business even existed was to offset the cost of their own hardware distribution.

            I remember that. Like many online services, they planned for high peek loads and found the hardware sitting idle a lot of the time.

            Then someone there had the bright idea to rent the unused servers out, truely realised John McCarthy’s vision and left Ian Foster and the Grid camp very pissed off, X-P

  • Even if they aren’t directly selling the games and merely hosting a third party vendor, they are knowingly facilitating piracy at this point, which if memory serves is a criminal offence in itself.

Show more comments

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!