What Brought Diablo 4's World Together

diablo 4 world design blizzard blizzcon 2019Image: Diablo 4

It's been a long road for Diablo 4, one filled with multiple bumps and changes in direction. And one of those problems was an issue with the open world, where everything felt a little too cramped. But in an interview with Kotaku Australia at Blizzcon, the game's production director explained how they nailed a key tenet of Diablo 4.

The problem, as production director Gavian Whishaw explained (while the game's lead artist, Richie Marella, drew on an iPad), was what to do with Diablo 4's open world. "We had been talking about this concept of open world and what it means for a long time," Whishaw said. "We had iterations of the world that were pretty tight in terms of navigation and it didn't really feel open, it feels beautiful and it feels dark, it feels scary, it feels dangerous, but it feels like we're moving through tunnels all the time."

"Everything could run, but just imagine there's maybe one too many — it's a subtle thing — but there's one too many trees in your way, there's one too many rocks in your way," Whishaw explained.

It was a classic design issue. The space was technically there, but the visual design left the world feeling claustrophobic and cramped. "That's not the impact we want," Whishaw said. So the answer was to borrow some tricks from interior design, rearranging the objects and items in the world to make the space feel more open than it was.

Hands-On With Diablo IV: Dungeon Delving With An Open-World Twist

Diablo IV’s announcement at Blizzcon yesterday was packed with gruesome death. The long-awaited sequel’s tone is dark, and that carries over into the gameplay. My hands-on time with a demo build was exciting. Diablo IV eagerly ramps up the gore and dark magic for an experience that feels old-school but adds a few modern twists.

Read more

"We really started thinking about gameplay, it's gameplay first, and what does that look like for landscape. How do we interpret that to a landscape? And that's what they went and did, so suddenly it meant that you were running long distances," Whishaw said. "Suddenly the world was just open, you could run and you could go to the coastline and you could run down south and the landscape would change, and it was a really amazing moment. For me, I was like wow, the canvas is coming together and we can start putting gameplay on this, so that was really exciting."

"You had the feeling of traversing through a changing world and you were no longer bumping up against this, bumping up against that. And you know, that's one of those like, man, a lot of us started [talking] about, 'I really want to spend time in this world.'"

It's one of those moments that needs to happen for a game to truly click, and at Blizzcon it was nice to finally see Diablo 4, previously codenamed Fenris, finally coming together. Perhaps the most satisfying wasn't just the openness of the world, but its similarities with Diablo 2. Sources told Kotaku last year that Blizzard wanted to go back to the way Diablo 2's visceral, gritty, gothic style, and so far from what we've seen of the game, Diablo 4 is headed in the right direction.

The author travelled to Blizzcon 2019 as a guest of Blizzard.


Comments

    If it's that open, it'd be good to be able to zoom out to get a lay of the land. I always thought the view in Diablo was too blinkered anyway.

    What actually brought it together...

    The sheer desperation to erase Diablo Immortal backlash.

    It's so weird, but when I think of Diablo 2, I don't think of the 'gothic style' that so many people appear to be attributing to it.

    I think of those boggy, marshy fields. I think of that fucking desert. I think of the super-annoying pygmies in the jungle. All the stuff that was unique to D2 compared to D1, until D3 came and basically cloned it with higher resolution and detail.

    When people talk gothic, I think D1's gothic cathedral dungeon, and the higher-rez versions that D3 created in seeming tribute. Maybe D2's Pandemonium fortress, bits of Hell. When people talk dark, I think D1's claustrophobic light radius, of creatures you couldn't see but could hear.

    I nearly failed Uni thanks to how long I spent in D2, but I dunno... I see this stuff about D3 being too bright/campy/cartoony compared to D2, and I really wonder if I was playing the same game everyone else apparently was...

      Those damn pygmies!
      Although for me I will always remember the acid spitting dog things in D1 where I walked into a room full of them towards the end of the game and they annihilated me.
      I was so pissed about that.

      But yeah I think your right.
      I think the game was "darker" simply because of the way the graphics were back then.
      I don't see much of a change in style from D2 to D3.
      It's been ages since I played D2 though.

      Yeah I feel like everyone forgets the desert existed at all. Maybe they blocked it out.

    Just as a teaser: the iPad line is in there for a reason.

    You'll all find out what that's about tomorrow. I promise it's fun.

      You tease! I thought THIS article was the one your tweet was about.

        Haha no. This was actually meant to be part of that article as well, but when I was doing the transcription I realised this part was worth pulling out for a separate thing. You'll spot where it came from easily enough.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now