Three Years Later: Is Switch Nintendo’s Best-Ever Console?

10
Three Years Later: Is Switch Nintendo’s Best-Ever Console?
Image: Sam Woolley

Long before release, before it even had a name, the Switch worried me. Not because I lacked faith in Nintendo, nor because I expected the console to be a disappointment. It was because, on some level, this hardware would be all-or-nothing for the most venerable company in video game history.

While Nintendo’s portable business had always been successful, since the emergence of Sony and later Microsoft, the history of its home consoles was more akin to feast and famine: Gamecube was squeezed by Ps2 and Xbox, the Wii found a new and enormous market, then Wii U missed the mark and sold terribly.

Make no mistake that this was, and remains, a possible future for Nintendo. It is one of the most-valuable public companies in Japan, with some of the greatest brands and expertise in a thriving multi-multi-billion industry.

During the Wii U years analysts and shareholders alike speculated about whether the company could be taking more profitable routes. Nintendo’s various mobile offerings show that this market was, simply, too big to ignore: then-president Satoru Iwata admitted his concern that the company might “cease to be Nintendo” when it began developing for other platforms. If Switch tanked, I thought we’d see Mario on PlayStation.

Switch did not tank. It is often described as a hybrid console, which is a perfect description for a piece of hardware that synthesises not only home and portable play, but over four decades of Nintendo design principles. Gumpei Yokoi, the genius best-known for the Game Boy, encapsulated his thinking about hardware design in the phrase “lateral thinking with withered technology.”

That is, a Nintendo principle is to use cheaper and older technology in unexpected ways. In Yokoi’s day he was talking about calculator components and LCD screens. It would be unfair to describe the custom Tegra X1 powering the Switch as ‘withered’ hardware, but the chip was first released in 2008 and the X1 iteration in 2015.

Here’s the thing though: it can do absolutely everything it needs to. And to overly focus on what’s powering Switch would rather miss the point anyway, because what matters is the lateral thinking. The most important and outright ballsy concept was that, for the first time, Nintendo was going to integrate its home console and portable hardware. After the Switch’s success one might respond, “well of course they did.”

But that undersells the magnitude of this: Nintendo’s portable business had arguably kept it alive in the lean years, it had definitively seen off Sony, and 3DS was doing gangbusters numbers (as of Christmas 2019, it’s sold 75 million units). In hindsight, it seems like the second letter of Switch’s development codename of NX was hinting towards this crossover: the potential rewards were huge, of course, but the portable business was a golden goose in its own right.

This combining of home and portable enabled Nintendo to puts its whole weight behind Switch’s software, both first and third party. Coming off the back of Wii U, which was supported barely if at all by most major publishers, Nintendo began to use one of its most powerful weapons: nostalgia.

The company that once controlled access to its hardware like Cerberus had realised that a whole new generation of developers had grown up in love with, and later inspired by, Nintendo’s old consoles and games. A feature of Switch since its day of release is the pace and quantity of third party releases, to the extent that Nintendo now has the opposite problem (there are so many games it can be hard for players to sift through them).

I’ve got this far without even mentioning the killer gimmick. Nintendo’s consoles always have toy-like physical aspects to them, from the unnecessary SNES eject button to the Gamecube carry handle: it’s just that this time, the console is designed to be touched constantly.

There was an absolute wow factor the first time I saw a Switch docked and the visuals appear on-screen, it’s an awesome trick. But the whole process of doing it yourself is something else, from the way one carefully slides down the console’s body to the click-and-slide of each Joy-Con as you lift them out. And vice-versa. At the heart of Switch is that magic trick of jumping between screens, and Nintendo’s designers baked-in that the player triggers this in a tactile way.

This alone would differentiate Switch, but the next surprise is what happened when it was in the hands. The Switch’s distinctive form factor is bigger than a traditional portable console, but the majority of it is taken up by the gorgeous screen: where Wii U was (perhaps fairly) criticised for feeling a little cheap and underpowered, the Switch body looks and feels like a premium product.

This is helped no end by the Joy-Cons, which combine novelty factor with an exceptional history in controller design. It’s not just that the analogue sticks are beautiful, that the button layout and ‘clickfeel’ is ideal, or the precision-engineered ‘sproing’ of the triggers. It’s the ghost of the Wii’s controller and Nunchuk setup, the share button half-inched from Sony, and the exquisite incorporation of both motion-sensing and rumble mechanics. Sadly the best use of the latter remains the overlooked launch title 1-2 Switch, but my hopes remain high for the triumphant return of Wii Sports.

Image: Kotaku

There was another launch title, of course, a little number called Breath of the Wild. At the time I described this as the best game Nintendo had made since Super Mario 64, and it is some sort of cosmic coincidence that Nintendo both designed a piece of brilliant hardware and launched it just as the Zelda developers escaped a decades-long rut.

I love Zelda but there was a sense that the main series had seen diminishing returns ever since Wind Waker: doing the same things, in the same way, and struggling to meet expectations. Breath of the Wild upended them, and was the shot in the arm Zelda needed, largely thanks to it looking at the competition and absorbing some non-Nintendo ideas (which of course were re-configured in Nintendo style: see item degradation, or the new loosey-goosey structure, or even the huge visual influence of Xenoblade Chronicles).

There was one more lesson learned from Wii U. Nintendo had gradually been moving towards exploiting its own back catalogue ever since DS and Wii, but it was never really all-in. Wii U needed software badly, and so Nintendo began to offer up remakes like Wind Waker HD and Twilight Princess HD, as well as remixing its own history in NES Remix 1 and 2, and re-purposing assets with the likes of New Super Luigi U.

When you have a history like Nintendo, this is a very good idea, and it meant that shortly after launch Switch was blessed with the likes of Super Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, alongside quickfire sequels to the likes of Splatoon and Xenoblade Chronicles.

switch lite

This conveyor belt of high-quality first party software, backed up by a seemingly endless stream of indie and big publisher releases on eShop, has made Switch the most comprehensively-supported console in Nintendo’s history.

For a while after its release, and to this day, there was a joke among developers and journalists that the only question anyone asked about new titles was “when is it coming to Switch?” I’m not sure one could quite call it a meme, but at the very least there’s a Twitter account dedicated to calling for any video game ever to come to Switch. Hey, I agree!

Looking at Switch now, its success can seem pre-ordained. It’s such a beautiful piece of hardware, and slots into a busy life in a way that the more monolithic competition simply cannot match. It’s got that bit of magic one expects from Nintendo, it’s somehow both toylike and Serious Kit, and the software support is off the chart.

But it was an incredibly brave choice, because if Switch went wrong it could have left Nintendo in deep financial trouble and having to change the nature of the company. That’s why we love Nintendo though, right? It never does the expected, and sometimes that works and sometimes it doesn’t. For as long as I’ve been playing games, I’ve loved Nintendo’s hardware. Three years down the line, and it feels like Switch is the best video games console that any company, never mind Nintendo, has ever made.


This post originally appeared on Gizmodo UK, which is gobbling up the news in a different timezone.

Comments

  • They’ve really smashed it out of the park this time. The Wii was also crazy popular but didn’t follow through with the games. The Switch has completely reversed that and we’ve had some of the best entries in the series. It’s been a fun ride and not stopping yet!

  • Ive been a Nintendo fan since the NES, and yep this is their best….concept.

    The hardware issues stop it from being their best console though. Can’t ignore that.

    • The hardware issues are crazy, because they seem to stem for poor design decisions made for the sake of keeping costs down.

      Once upon a time Nintendo were praised for the engineering of their products. My Gameboy, NES and SNES are all still working great (I replaced the membrane buttons a couple of years back and that’s been all). My son’s Switch started feeling like it was suffering wear and tear after only 6 months, with the Joycons getting looser in their slots. Two years later and I’ve had to replace the joysticks three times, and now the buttons are sticking. And the dock has never worked reliably at all.

  • The biggest problem with the console is the overpriced software. I just can’t justify buying anything on it unless it’s a AAA Nintendo classic that I can’t play somewhere else- that means it has to be better than what I could get on another system or PC for the equivalent price (almost always full retail). I’m not keen on buying slightly compromised 3rd party ports of games I’ve either played on other systems or can get for a quarter of the price.

    The end result is my Switch really doesn’t have many games and I only ever buy new ones when I know I’m going to get stuck somewhere I won’t have a better choice. It’s a cool system and Zelda was great… but it’s just not a system I get much use from.

    If it had a good Gamepass style service on it with indies and back-catalogue games from the N64, GC, Wii/ U it would rocket up my list of favourite machines.

  • Sorry. No. Wii U had %100 backwards compatibility – for both physical and digital media, and controllers – supported multiple forms of external storage (HDD, Flash), allowed simultaneous 2 screen play, (TV & WiiU tab), and that’s just off the top of my head…
    I’d really like to see a Switch 2.1 incorporate spme of these features.

  • Before the Switch came out, people were coming up with physical controller cradles for phones attempting to bridge the gap between handheld consoles and mobiles with touch screen interfaces. It worked, but only if your games supported those controllers and where they tried to be all-inclusive the precision and reliability wasn’t there. You also had Apple and Google trying to make their streaming devices (AppleTV and Chromecast) the next big innovation in gaming by allowing you to stream games you owned on mobile to TV and play them on a bigger screen.

    Razer and NVidia were also working from the other side with adding physical controls to portable computer tablets that could be streamed to higher resolution screens as well. The problem was none of these ideas really succeeded because the experience was always that the games were built for a different experience. Then NVidia and Nintendo teamed up to put together the Switch, a console that was built from the ground up to have physical controls and a streaming experience.

    So from a conceptual standpoint the Switch has been the marrying on handheld and home console that people have been wanting for a long time, especially since all of the games they own on both console and mobile are coming to it. If you look at the fact that around 30% of people with a Switch Lite also have a Switch though it shows that it has also somewhat failed in that endeavour because people still have separate versions for handheld usage and to be a home console.

    Combining that with hardware issues, a badly designed UI and store experience and a growing shovelware problem it feels like there’s still a while to go before the overall Switch experience exceeds its predecessors.

  • The Nintendo Switch definitely has smashed it out of the park and with so many more Nintendo Switch games coming out later this year including SEGA’s Panzer Dragoon the upcoming Shin Megami Tensei V game still in development by Atlus and Trails of Cold Steel 3 coming out later this year I’ll definitely keep the Nintendo Switch adrenaline pumping as we get closer to this year E3 in June.

  • I love the Switch, except I’ve had joy-con drift issues twice.

    Once while it was still under warranty and only about 9 months old (so not a big deal but still annoying to deal with), and the second time was way out of warranty and I ended up buying a second-hand left joy-con from EB Games (because I’d be stuffed if I was going to pay full price for a new double set of joy-cons) , which had its own issues I didn’t pick up until I got it out of it packaging, and it was so chipped the shoulder button couldn’t be pressed down. Had to return that the next day and thankfully the 3rd one I have now seems to be ok, for now at least.

    Anyway, that and also being on the 3rd 3DS (for various other issues), means I don’t like Nintendo hardware much anymore, even though I still love the games.

    The gamecube never faulted once for me. So I don’t know what’s going on with my luck with hardware lately, but I don’t feel confident with them anymore.

  • In my opinion, its not the peak of Nintendo. I’d argue its not even Top 3, and barely Top 5. The NES was groundbreaking for many reasons, and the SNES was even better. Those two are ‘better’ than the Switch just by being what caused the entire console industry to be what it is today. The SNES in particular launched so many franchises its astounding with many of the games still best in franchise today.

    The original Gameboy would also be higher than the Switch, for similar reasons. Pick a version along the way, like the DS or more likely the 3DS, but without the Gameboy family the Switch wouldnt have been a thought.

    Then there’s the Wii, which made niche popular. It wasnt a great console in terms of pushing the limits, but it was a great console in terms of what it was capable of. No other console has opened up the opportunities like the Wii did.

    The Switch does one thing those others dont. Like @germinalconsequence says it (very successfully) combines that mobile and console experience into one event. And for that, its important. But its not the best Nintendo have done. Not even close. I’d say thats either the SNES or Gameboy myself.

  • SNES was the peak of Nintendo’s quality and proflicacy.

    SNES was leading the way, for its time. Switch is not. It still doesn’t know how to grasp online services the way that the rest of the industry figured out a decade ago. The Switch is enjoying some success for filling a niche and filling it well, but it’s not living up to its potential the way that the SNES did. And it’s not because of hardware restrictions, or circumstances of competition and the market, but because of boneheaded decision-making. The only thing stopping the Switch from being the best that Nintendo can be is Nintendo itself.

    • The SNES was like Nintendos equivalent of the PS2.

      Improvement over the first in every way and an enormous amount of extremely high quality games.

  • Comes pretty damn close to being perfect apart from the *cough* constant faulty controllers *cough* otherwise it’s a great 3-in-1 home,holidays or humbugs….

Log in to comment on this story!