Wasteland 3, From The Perspective Of A Wasteland Newcomer

Wasteland 3, From The Perspective Of A Wasteland Newcomer
Screenshot: InXile

Early on in Wasteland 3, you’re forced to make a choice. The family of one of your party members, a young woman named Lucia Wesson, was recently killed. An early quest has you stumble upon a camp of downtrodden apocalypse survivors, where you meet Lucia’s ex-boyfriend. Even if he didn’t technically pull the trigger, he’s directly responsible for the death of her family. You can let an incensed Lucia shoot the guy, you can shoot him yourself, or you can tell her to stand down.

This is my first Wasteland game; I clearly didn’t grasp the unpredictable nature of the series’ narratives, and was blindsided by what happened next. I let Lucia do her thing. Her ex-beau didn’t die immediately — in fact, the game went out of its way to inform me he’d have a slow and painful death — so I told her to put a bullet in his brain to put him out of his misery. That sparked a skirmish with the rest of the campers. A few minutes later, they were all dead.

This is my Wasteland 3 experience in a nutshell: At every turn, I’ve faced a staggering degree of choice with very little guidance as to what outcomes those choices beget. Did I want to slaughter a group of innocents? Absolutely not! But it happened anyway, and the game moved apace on its uncaring, cynical warpath. As a newcomer to Wasteland who isn’t going in with any expectations other than wanting to have a good time, I am a little disappointed with what I’ve played so far.

Why You Should Care About Wasteland 2

“There was this one moment in Fallout 3, when I came across a prisoner at some raider camp,” I said. “She was still tied up, but all the raiders were gone. Maybe they were dead or something, I don’t know. The game gave me a choice: I could take her...

Read more

Wasteland 3, out now for PC, Xbox One, and PlayStation 4 (where I played), is the latest in a standard-setting series of post-apocalyptic role-playing games. In 2012, after a decades-long hiatus, Wasteland zipped back into cultural consciousness. By then, Brian Fargo, the co-founder of Interplay and one of the key designers of that studio’s original 1988 Wasteland, had founded InXile Entertainment, which famously Kickstarted Wasteland 2 to “help bring back an entire genre of RPGs.” Wasteland 2 eventually came out for PC in September 2014, with PS4, Xbox One, and Switch versions released in subsequent years. The game was largely praised as a return to form for the genre, if a bit shinier than the clunky role-playing games from the ‘80s and ‘90s.

There's a character named Faran Brygo, a play on series creator Brian Fargo's name. (Screenshot: InXile)There’s a character named Faran Brygo, a play on series creator Brian Fargo’s name. (Screenshot: InXile)

Wasteland 3 is a mix of tactical third-person shooter, deep role-playing game, isometric strategy game, and, to a degree, a management sim. You control a squad of up to six Rangers — basically, the paramilitary cops of the apocalypse — in a futuristic Colorado ravaged by decades of nuclear winter. Combat is turn-based; you move your party members around a grid-based battlefield, lining up and taking shots based on percentage chances, which hover over the heads of enemies and indicate how successful (or not) your attacks will be.

Unlike some recent tactical game games such as Gears Tactics, Wasteland 3 characters are governed by a truly dizzying array of stats, skills, attributes, and perks. You can pour points into an attribute called Luck, for instance, which increases something called Lucky Action Chance, but Wasteland 3 never explains what those actions of good fortune are. Levelling up Awareness increases your Perception, but to learn what that means, you have to dive into a submenu. Those are just two of the seven skills, and that’s to say nothing of the Quirks, permanent double-edged bonuses that buff one stat at the expense of another. Beyond that, there are 22 different skills. You can level up each one up to 10 times, which then opens up your access to skill-specific perks. Multiply this by your six squad members, and you can see how confusing things can get if managing stats isn’t your thing. At least in Gears Tactics, it’s clear that equipping a sniper rifle just means you can shoot things from really far away.

This staggeringly complex numbers game gives that sense that battles are dictated by your choices, yes, but also by an unknown degree of behind-the-scenes maths. Longtime series fans may understand what each and every stat means, and how exactly they impact battles. The same cannot be said for newcomers like me. Since Wasteland 3 forces you to allot points for all this stuff from the start — if you go the custom-character route, as many players of role-playing games are wont to do — it’s natural for rookies to feel like the game wasn’t meant for them. Imagine if you booted up a modern Fallout game and the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. skill allotment system was explained in the vaguest possible language. That these decisions, in Wasteland 3, lay the framework for two of your party mainstays is yet another hurdle for newcomers.

Thankfully, I’ve found that playing on the lowest difficulty counterbalances all of this confusion, to a degree. Wasteland 3 is playable in four standard difficulty settings. Wastelander is the standard difficulty. Rookie is the lowest. Neither of those have friendly fire turned on, meaning you can line up shots and toss explosives without risk. (The higher two tiers, Ranger and Supreme Jerk, come with friendly fire turned on. Absolutely not!)

Playing on Wastelander, even with friendly fire off, I’d get wiped half a dozen times per battle, without fail. I’d miss sniper shots pegged at 90-per cent chance of victory. Enemies would gang up on my weakest party members and knock them out before I got a chance to give them orders. I never really had a sense of how strong each foe was, how far they could travel, or what they would do. I certainly never grasped why I could only shoot once per turn but my enemies could shoot two or three times (or more). Some enemy soldiers have armour, and it never clicked, for me, why sometimes my bullets had no effect and sometimes pierced through. In one frustrating encounter, a group of pigs strapped with dynamite kept running into my team, killing two or three party members at a time. At every turn, I found myself sorely missing the overwatch feature from Gears Tactics and XCOM.

Screenshot: InXileScreenshot: InXile

But turning things down to Rookie made fights a manageable, if still punishing, experience. Characters would get shot and still survive. They’d also dish out damage more predictably; enemy armour, especially, seemed less like a cumbersome, inexplicable wall between me and victory. Even when facing some explosive pigs, my party members still survived (mostly) intact. Switching the difficulty didn’t dissuade me from the belief that Wasteland’s complex world wasn’t made for a rookie like me — in fact, I still don’t fully understand how all these systems work — but at least I felt like I could survive in it.

Between battles, you’re given more or less free rein to explore the bombed out wasteland of Colorado, including the frozen remains of Aspen, Denver, and Colorado Springs. In towns and dungeons, you do things that you usually do in role-playing games: talk to people, fiddle with equipment, and loot everything in sight. Crates, dumpsters, lockers, frozen bodies — if you see it, you can probably rob it. My inventory, which appears bottomless, soon got cluttered with purposeless items that are broadly categorised as “junk.” It’s possible to sell all this stuff at the press of a button, but, in the absence of a careful inventory management system, I found myself wishing I could just pick it up in its purest form: cold, hard cash.

All six of your characters are present on screen at all times, which is a nice, if occasionally maddening, touch. If you choose to let the AI steer them instead of controlling them one-by-one, they’ll follow you, but they won’t stay in line. More times than I could count, my party members kept setting off enemy alarms or strolling directly into an enemy’s line of sight, triggering a battle before I could get a good setup going. So much for tactical planning. (This is another common situation where playing on the lowest difficulty has saved my skin more times than I care to admit.)

When you don’t control six disorderly humans, you pilot a tank-like vehicle called the Kodiak in the snowy overworld, where you can interact with travelling caravans and dodge radiation storms. You can also get jumped by random enemies. These events pull you out of the tank and back into grid-based, gun-slinging familiarity. Helpfully, in such battles, you control the Kodiak as if it’s one of your party members, and can use its massive gun to dish out some serious damage. Unhelpfully, the Kodiak can totally ruin your plans. When I first ordered the thing to the frontline, two of my squad members moved out of its way — and directly into the line of fire. Hey, you die and you learn, right?

All of this is wrapped in a meta-game of sorts. At the start of Wasteland 3, your boss, a dude named “The Patriarch” tasks you with finding his three disobedient children. One’s taken over Aspen with a small army. One’s holed up in Denver, and has cut off the oil supply to Colorado Springs, the Patriarch’s homebase. The third has disappeared without a trace.

To help in your three-pronged, open-ended quest, the Patriarch gives you the keys to a defunct Air Force base. This serves as the new Ranger headquarters, and you can staff it up with various specialists. Most are standard-issue army staff — a jailor, a quartermaster, a mechanic — but, after one side quest, I recruited a physicist who happens to be an expert in the science of cloning. (I’m not sure yet what practical purpose this serves. It’s just cool as heck.) Though the recruitment and management system isn’t terribly deep, it’s still satisfying to see your ranks swell in real time.

At Ranger HQ, you can also recruit new members into your party. These characters are where I started to see some cracks in this otherwise well-realised world, mainly as a result of how people talk. Seemingly every other line of dialogue in this game has a “fuck” or a “fucker” or a “fucking” or some other swear word in it. There’s nothing wrong with profanity, but in Wasteland 3, it felt to me like a crutch. I sometimes felt like the game used it merely to make up for an absence of more clever dialogue. This is a game where the Stealth stat is instead called “Sneaky Shit,” for crying out loud.

There are also moments where the language veers directly into offensive territory. I was turned off by a pantsless, stuttering character named “Shakes” in a nightclub called Little Vegas. Shakes needs help retrieving a lost stash of drugs. Their moniker, if I’m correctly understanding the “joke,” is meant to mock the fact that people who use drugs might stutter during withdrawal, something that’s underscored by the fact that you can respond by calling him a “poor little twitch-head.” Showcasing a character suffering from withdrawal is of course totally within bounds. Portraying them one-dimensionally, and using them as a butt of a joke, is not. That such downward-punching dialogue is present in a game released this year — years past the statute of limitations for not knowing any better — is downright baffling. We simply shouldn’t accept it when reductive language is used to describe any fellow human, apocalypse be damned.

It all contributes to the unmistakable feeling that Wasteland 3 is a creature of the past. This is likely intentional; Wasteland 3 is, of course, more Wasteland. If you’re a diehard series fan, as many people clearly are, you might find it all enough to keep you going through an 80- to 100-hour adventure. In series tradition, there are many, many endings, based on the various choices you make from tip to tail. As a newcomer, it’s a longshot that I’ll see even one of them.


  • “It all contributes to the unmistakable feeling that Wasteland 3 is a creature of the past.”

    Entirely intentional. When they made WL2, they were returning to the gameplay styles of old. Games where micromanaging was the order of the day, as modern RPG’s have streamlined far too much. It’s interesting reading the take here, I can’t say I agree with much of it, I find WL3 to be an utter delight so far (bugs aside, and tbh there’s HEAPS of bugs so far, but to be expected right upon release. For instance, none of the Clowns have bodies in my game!)

    But that being said, I’m finding this to be the Fallout game I wish the last few Fallouts had of been. The choices are excellent, the turn based Xcom style combat very fitting and the character creation was pretty damn good. Controls are pretty tight (but could be a tiny bit better, at times they can be finicky) and the graphics waver between fantastic to ‘they seriously settled on THAT for a model?’

    I helped to back WL3 years and years ago when they first announced it, I think we paid 30 bucks, so I can’t complain. For 89.95 at rrp? I might feel a little jaded at it’s current state, so to those humming and harring, I’d say give it a month or two for patches to fix the game at this stage, but for what I paid? It’s bloody brilliant.

    • “Seemingly every other line of dialogue in this game has a “fuck” or a “fucker” or a “fucking” or some other swear word in it. There’s nothing wrong with profanity, but in Wasteland 3, it felt to me like a crutch. ”

      It’s a crude, horrible world filled with hate and death. I mean, honestly, sounds like you’re a little too sensitive over it?

      “Showcasing a character suffering from withdrawal is of course totally within bounds. Portraying them one-dimensionally, and using them as a butt of a joke, is not.”

      As someone who has had to, for over fifteen years, deal with a family member who had a long term addiction to substances, who has had to endure things like watching her children go abused due to this, raise her kids for her and be subjected to the abuse from junkies etc. I whole heartedly say this: Get over it mate and pack away your privilege please, I find your reductive reasoning and poor use of ‘current year’ argument there hyper offensive. But I don’t need you to change your opinion, I don’t care if you do, but your request there is absolutely absurd.

      “At every turn, I found myself sorely missing the overwatch feature from Gears Tactics and XCOM.”

      Incidentally, this game HAS that option, sounds like you either just didn’t pay attention to the tutorial. On the right hand side arrow, when you end your characters turn, select the ‘eye’ option to enter that mode instead of the shield to protect yourself or the hour glass to store extra points for next turn, as long as you’re within the ‘blue’ range of movement and have the points left to move, your character will enter ‘overwatch’ and shoot within the enemies turn if they see the enemy enter their field of fire?

      • I preferred your review. I will wait for the patches and pick it up in a couple of months.

        Any thoughts on the co-op?

        • We’re doing that this weekend, I’m barely getting time to play it this week, as I’m a teacher and given it’s exam time (week 8) I’m pressed for spare time. Long weekend though and we’re hitting it hard this weekend. However, word is it’s a bit dicey at the moment but still fun. Apparently that and the graphical glitches are the focus of the upcoming patches. I really do recommend it at this point for oldschool fans of the first 2 Fallout games, it’s a fun game. But the price might put people off at RRP, see if you can grab it online somewhere for a cheaper price. In 2 – 3 months the price will drop significantly I guarantee. This is a game that feels like it hasn’t made many concessions to a studio, it’s worth noting.

          • Neat. I’ll wait for Steam Christmas sale then. I have enough on my plate with Ghost of Tsushima and other upcoming games.

          • That’s what my mate was just telling me. He said something about a glitch that keeps resetting his progress? Apparently that’s really high on the priority list.

          • The Steam discussion board seems to be filled with similar opinions. I’ll wait till the sales.

  • Social standards change over time. We measure the span that these changes happen in years pretty often.

    Dismissing a person’s point by throwing out CURRENT YEAR ARGUMENT with no other attempt to engage is like LUDONARRATIVE DISSONANCE all over again.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!