Classification Board Says Gamers Thanked Them For Not Banning Cyberpunk 2077

Classification Board Says Gamers Thanked Them For Not Banning Cyberpunk 2077
Image: Cyberpunk 2077
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Kotaku Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

The Classification Board frequently cops a lot of flak whenever a game falls afoul of Australia’s tight classification guidelines — but thanks to Cyberpunk 2077, the Board actually received some positive feedback for once.

The feedback was mentioned during the Classification Board’s annual report, which was filed to the Federal Government last month. The report covers the general operations of the board, the current board and review board members, numbers on how many decisions the Board made in a year and comparisons to the workload with previous years.

COVID-19, for instance, resulted in the board having classified substantially less material, with a 19 per cent reduction in games classified, 29 per cent fewer games classified through the IARC online tool and even a 21 per cent drop in titles classified through the Netflix tool.

Part of the report also includes notes on how many pieces of correspondence the Board gets every year. To the absolute surprise of nobody, video games generates more interest than everything else the Board classifies:

Board media type/classification tool Number received
Publications 5
Films 70
Computer games 175
IARC tool 9
Netflix tool 20

Most of the correspondence was in the form of complaints, although for a nice change of pace there was some positive feedback. The annual report noted that amongst all the complaints, there was “several compliments and expressions of thanks” for the Board’s decision not to ban Cyberpunk 2077, along with some anime:

During the 2019–20 reporting period, the Board received in excess of 250 pieces of correspondence including complaints about film and computer game decisions (either that the classification was too high or too low), several compliments and expressions of thanks (in relation to the classification the Board gave the high-profile computer game, Cyberpunk 2077 and for classifying certain anime in accordance with the Film Guidelines), and several inquiries about older classification decisions about films classified 30+ years ago. Commentary received from members of the Australian public in the classification process is important and valued.

The report doesn’t note what anime was classified, or any particulars about the correspondence. (Australian privacy law most likely would prevent the Board or department from releasing those emails, in any case, although the individuals who sent them could always publish them online freely.)

Still, it’s nice to note that some people actually took the time to say thanks. And that was amongst the 175 complaints, a massive increase from the 39 received in the 2018-19 financial year. And considering how frantic COVID has been for most people, if you’re playing an R18+ game later this year — Cyberpunk perhaps — it might not hurt to email in and say thanks.


  • People don’t give much thought to what a thankless job working on a ratings board must be.

    I’m glad to hear that people took the time for thanking them for making a good call about Cyberpunk and giving mature games more room to breath.

  • Wouldn’t bother me if it was banned or they demanded bs changes like less gore or no blood.. Would simply torrent it or use a vpn to download.. They are a useless joke and waste of tax payer money when they can’t actually stop people.. Not like you could get jail for ignorong them and even of you could.. Lols who cares..

  • Thank them for not banning a game? Thank you for giving me permission to decide for myself what games I play? They can go and f*ck themselves.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!