Players Aren’t Happy About Assassin’s Creed Valhalla’s Transmog Tax

Players Aren’t Happy About Assassin’s Creed Valhalla’s Transmog Tax
Screenshot: Ubisoft / Kotaku

A couple months after release, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla finally has transmog, but not as some players had originally envisioned it. The feature falls short of how it’s been implemented in past games, and comes with a 50 silver tax on each transaction to boot, leaving a lot of us, myself included, scratching out heads.

Transmog, which lets players mix the stats of one piece of gear with the appearance of another, was implemented shortly after Assassin’s Creed Odyssey’s launch as well. There, it was a simple and easy to use option available right in the gear menu. Not so in Valhalla, which requires players to go visit the blacksmith Gunnar, engage in some dialogue, and then pay him 50 silver to make the change. “Pleased transmog is finally added,” wrote one player in the patch notes thread over on the game’s subreddit. “Confused as to why it needs silver and can only be done at the settlement.”

The frustration has broken out into other threads as well, with players arguing that this potentially more immersive approach to changing your armour’s appearance is ultimately silly when it comes to a game about mythical gods and monsters that literally takes place inside of a simulation. A thread on Ubisoft’s forums, meanwhile, takes issue with the lack of transmog options, especially when it comes to seeing what your character will look like before you make the changes.

Screenshot: Ubisoft / Kotaku Screenshot: Ubisoft / Kotaku

And then there’s the issue of the 50 silver, an in-game currency you can collect throughout the world, but which is also sold for real money in Ubisoft’s microtransaction shop. On the one hand, 50 silver isn’t going to break the bank for most players, even if they’re going hog wild transmogging everything they own. On the other, why charge a nominal fee at all unless you think it might encourage some players to dip their toes into the game’s expansive microtransaction economy?

Ubisoft did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but community manager domvgt wrote over on the game’s subreddit that players’ frustrations are being relayed back to the development team.

This week’s 1.2 update also came with a free “Godly Pack”, giving players 300 Opals (one of Valhalla’s special currencies) on the house, as well as access to the game’s recent Yuletide cosmetics and a new Altaïr armour set (the main protagonist of the first Assassin’s Creed). As Eurogamer points out, the free gift seems like “a bit of a recompense” for some of the other ways Valhalla’s microtransactions have occasionally muddied what is an otherwise very good single-player open world RPG. This includes the number of armour sets added to the game as paid DLC versus those included at launch, as well as the later addition of things like the infamous paid XP Booster.

It’s not surprising Ubisoft keeps trying to walk this microtransaction tight rope, even as Valhalla continues to top the sales charts month after month. Microtransactions, or as the French publisher likes to call them, “Player Recurring Investment,” is a major money-maker for the company, especially as it’s released fewer gamers in recent years.

Still, I doubt Valhalla’s transmog tax will end up contributing much to Ubisoft’s bottom line, which makes its addition all the more bizarre. The company released another open world RPG last year — Fenyx: Immortals Rising — and it had a brilliant transmog system that came with no strings attached. Why should Valhalla be any different?

Ubisoft Waits A Month To Start Selling XP Booster For Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

What do you do when you launch an Assassin’s Creed game, include the option for your customers to pay $US13 ($17) to level up faster, draw all kinds of negative reactions — many of them suspicious, wary — and then launch a new Assassin’s Creed two years later? Launch with that...

Read more

Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla: The Kotaku Review

Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla, a huge game made during a pandemic and with its own studio and parent company in crisis, is a game trying to do some difficult things. The first Assassin’s Creed in two years, and the 12th major Assassin’s Creed overall, it is the work of creators who...

Read more

The Making Of Assassin’s Creed Valhalla’s Best Bonus Region

One of the best parts of Assassin’s Creed Valhalla does not take place in England. Where you go is a spoiler. It’s also one of the best parts of the game. We recently asked the people who made it to explain its origins.

Read more

Comments

  • I’ll defend Ubi when it comes to all the XP booster nonsense that gets massively blown out of proportion EVERY SINGLE TIME, by people I’d argued haven’t even played the damn games to see they dish out XP by the boatload even at the supposedly ‘nerfed to sell boosters!’ rate.

    But this? I’m on board with them being called greedy for a feature that is pretty much always free. Even in their own damn games… Immortals Fenyx Rising is a glaring, very recent example of this being a base feature from the word go.

  • It’s 50 silver… A single run through some buildings or a camp will net you this amount.

    Diablo 3 charged up to 50000 good for a single transmog on legendary items and noone batted an eye, are we seriously at the point where such a trivial cost causes such outrage?

    • Clearly no-one’s even looked in WoW’s direction. Hundreds of gold every time you want to transmog just to keep your same look when you replace some gear.

    • It really doesn’t though. Silver is the base currency, but even that isn’t earned quickly.

      It could possibly be linked to MTX, but I’m not convinced. Either way, their MTX are excessive and I wish something was done about it. Unfortunately, some idiots buy them all up anyway, which only encourages them

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!