The Halo Infinite And Battlefield 2042 Communities Are Arguing Over Which Game Is Worse

The Halo Infinite And Battlefield 2042 Communities Are Arguing Over Which Game Is Worse

The community revolt against Halo Infinite and its progression and microtransactions driven business model is now rounding out its second week. Complaints about its battle pass and aggressive in-game store have burned on social media since it launched on Monday last week.

What’s been interesting about this fallout is that it has been happening in tandem with another community meltdown. Battlefield 2042 launched to middling fan reception and its myriad issues have left the community torn on what it would like addressed first.

But there is something the Battlefield 2042 community seems to agree on: things could be worse. It could be the Halo community.

The Battlefield community has noticed the Halo fans tearing into Infinite‘s multiplayer and some don’t believe their grievances are as serious as the problems facing BF2042. The launch window for Battlefield 2042 has been rough, certainly. The rickety state of its gameplay has been scorched by aggrieved fans. These same players aren’t really sure how to properly explain their larger concerns. Thus, much of the community criticism around the game has devolved into nitpicking.

If you’ll grant me a moment to editorialise? To me, this feels less about pedantry and more like the effect of the black box that is game design. So much of the game development process is a mystery to the average player. Because of this, nitpicking becomes the only language many players have to properly express their dissatisfaction. Something I’ve been thinking about lately. Thanks for indulging me. Back to the story.

Halo Infinite, despite its microtransactions and battle pass, is a game that has launched in an extremely solid state. Bugs are minimal and generally of the unobtrusive (or outright funny) variety. Weapon balance still requires some tweaking, but it’s not the end of the world.

Some Halo fans have taken umbrage at this, insisting they feel Halo Infinite contains predatory microtransactions that are every bit as bad as the unstable state of BF2042.

The Battlefield community returned fire, insisting that widespread issues with performance and gameplay constitute a far worse state of affairs than a robustly made free-to-play game putting its hand out.

The Halo community says the issues extend beyond the microtransactions and into the game’s broader design.

The Battlefielders reminded the Haloans that Infinite is currently in beta and EA saw fit to ship BF2042 as a final retail release.

Halo Infinite fans contend 343 knew what it was doing with microtransactions and has (and continues to) wilfully rip its community off.

Drama abounds.

It should be said that those Halo players that dipped a toe into Battlefield 2042‘s waters seemed to have their minds changed on a few things.

If you feel these arguments are like chalk and cheese, I don’t know that I could blame you. However, together they do create an interesting picture of first-person shooter design in 2021. Both games were produced by a massive global workforce, remotely, as a pandemic swept across the world. Video games are hard to make. They must be a thousand times harder to make at home.

Neither community is wrong to feel aggrieved, particularly when these games are asking for such significant sums of your time and cash. Just remember that as frustrated as you might be, don’t take it out on the devs. Despite what you may believe, nobody sets out to make a bad game.

Comments

  • Having played both, even with Halo’s awful awful progression system, Battlefield 2042 is still orders of magnitude worse.

  • Halo’s progression is terrible, and 2042 seems like a garbage fire so why not in the words of the Old El Paso girl, Why not Both?

    That out of the way Halo is obviously going to get the spotlight because its community at this point will pretty big and it’s problem is very specific and actionable, the community wants less grindy progression. 2042 on the other hand had many fundamental problems that will require complex fixes and the community is going to be filled with a larger representation of the type of fan who is blind to criticism of the game as the ones who see the issues get frustrated and leave (probably to play Halo).

  • It should be a lesson in letting attenton seeking media and a few nutters on reddit distort the narrative.

    If Halo had a faster progression system hardcore players would be whinging they had nothing to unlock, if it had random unlockables people would be whinging about gambling elements, if it had more unlockables people would be whinging about development resources being diverted…

    And no matter what they say sites like this one will be beating it up.

  • Being old, who the hell cares if a FPS lets you play dress up? Halo has never offered any real sort of tangible reward for playing matches, since the entire point was to play for fun and not to unlock guns/class features as with Battlefield. Is everyone playing Halo now a Fortnite obsessed twelve year old who doesn’t realise that skins are completely meaningless? The entire idea of “progression” for cosmetics is complete garbage purely because it IS a FPS and not a MMO. Unless it’s a different announcer you can have enabled (which is still cosmetic, but far more impactful during gameplay), it really doesn’t add anything to the game.

    If you want to play dress ups, go play a MMORPG, where it’s visible and actually matters.

  • Gosh I want to like BF but it has been a long time I have played that is it’s own worst enemy. One of those ones, where you can see these tiny nuggets shining through but the level of illusion shattering bugs just work against it.

    And those roof top capture points. It’s like they were designed and play tested by people who always play with functional teams mates and tactics, not for 64 odd solo randoms.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!