Gabe Newell’s Problem Isn’t With NFTs Or Metaverse, But The ‘Bad Actors’ Behind Them

Gabe Newell’s Problem Isn’t With NFTs Or Metaverse, But The ‘Bad Actors’ Behind Them
Screenshot: TVNZ1

Valve co-founder and president Gabe Newell has given his two cents on the gaming world’s interest in NFTs and the metaverse.

Gaben’s been making the media rounds in support of Valve’s new Steam Deck hardware. This has granted him multiple opportunities to drop his hot takes on the state of the industry. His comments come after the banning of NFTs and all blockchain games from the Steam platform. The move was well-received by the community but criticised by developers creating blockchain games. This bled into the broader conversation that developers and publishers are having around the concept of the ‘metaverse’.

In an interview with Eurogamer, Newell explained that Valve reached its decision after it found the NFT and blockchain activity in some of these games to be ‘super sketchy’. While he says that blockchains as a form of technology are great, the ways in which they’re currently being used are not.

He further elaborates that the same problem has been raised with the use of cryptocurrencies. Newell points out that ’50 per cent of the cryptocurrency paid for transactions were fraudulent,” and the volatility of the currency meant that people were unaware of just how much they were paying for things on Steam. “Today, you paid 99 cents for it,” Newell explains, “Tomorrow, you’re going to pay $498 for it, and that makes people super cranky. So it just wasn’t a good method. The people who are currently active in that space are not usually good actors.”

In another interview, this time with PC Gamer, Newell talks about his feelings on the ‘metaverse’. He remarked that there’s a whole lot of ‘get rich quick schemes’ around the topic. He says what we’ve basically all been thinking: that what a lot of people are doing with the metaverse is nothing new. “They’ve apparently never played an MMO. They’re like, ‘Oh, you’ll have this customizable avatar.’ And it’s like, well… go into La Noscea in Final Fantasy XIV and tell me that this isn’t a solved problem from a decade ago, not some fabulous thing that you’re, you know, inventing.”

So basically, Gaben is echoing what the gaming community has been screaming for the past while. Sure, it’s nothing new, but it’s comforting to know that even some of the biggest names in the industry think that the current approaches to this technology are mostly financially predatory malarkey.

Comments

  • Nobody is against the concept of it all, it’s the execution that sucks several burlap sacks stuffed with dicks.

    • Most people are in fact against the concept of it all.

      Specifically, 1) NFTs offer no additional functionality beyond what is already available, attaching a blockchain to things adds literally nothing other than extra CPU cycles; and related to this, 2) processing blockchain is disproportionately energy intensive, costly and bad for the planet.

      • I’m talking the concept of tradable items across interconnected platforms and media, you’re talking about the execution.

        • The article is about NFTs and crypto, not ‘tradeable items across interconnected media’ which is a totally different thing. If game and media devs wanted tradeable items across platforms they could do it, but they don’t want that either, because it’s commercially and artistically idiotic.

          • Yes that’s right, tradable items such as NFT’s, Cryptos, the Metaverse and the terrible manner in which they are implemented.
            Good talk.

      • NFTs have done the opposite, artists are getting robbed, abused and left without recourse as rug pulls keep getting away with this.

  • Technology is never inherently good or bad. Its the people that tend to use it for various ends….

      • nuclear physics or even just nuclear technology has made significant contributions to humanity (e.g. think nuclear medicine, imaging etc.).

        People decided to make it into a bomb.

        The bomb is just an application, albeit a horrific one

        • Bazookas don’t kill people, they just leave oversized holes in people’s faces.

          I mean, if someone wants to kill you but only has access to a ball point pen they can still shove it up your arse, amirite?

          The fact that people die from bazookas and not arse pens is completely unrelated to the technology. Amirte?

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!