Streamers Aren’t Liking Twitch’s Potential Moneymaking Idea

Streamers Aren’t Liking Twitch’s Potential Moneymaking Idea
It's a bold move Twitch, let's see if it pays off. (Screenshot: TikTok / bradeazy / Kotaku)

Twitch is reportedly considering major changes to the monetisation practices that streamers are upset about because the potentially lopsided percentages work out to pad Twitch’s bottom line.

According to a Bloomberg report, Amazon, Twitch’s parent company, is considering multiple changes to its partner program in order to boost its profits. These changes include a new revenue split from subscriptions, a new tier system, and bolstering advertisements.

One of the monetisation changes under consideration is a revenue cut from subscriptions for partnered streamers, Twitch’s most popular streamers. The proposed cut would decrease the revenue partnered streamers make from subscriptions from 70% to 50%.

Another proposal Twitch is considering is adding a tiers system for partnered streamers. According to Bloomberg, these tiers detail the criteria a streamer must meet to receive 50% or 70% of revenue from their subscription. In exchange to this proposal, anonymous sources told Bloomberg that Twitch might release streamers from their exclusivity in their contracts, which will allow them to stream on Twitch’s competitor sites like YouTube and Facebook Gaming potentially to recoup any cut revenue.

Twitch is also reportedly considering incentives for more advertising through “revenue-sharing arrangement,” that Bloomberg says will present “a more lucrative model for streamers.”

Twitch streamers haven’t taken kindly to the news of Twitch’s proposed changes to its partnership program. Twitch streamer Vanessa Brasfield told Kotaku that she isn’t surprised by Twitch exploring these changes. If changes hit the website this summer as they are now, Brasfield said smaller streamers will have “little to no incentive” to grow their channels on the platform.

“Smaller streamers I think are going to have little to no incentive at this stage to really push for growth,” Brasfield said. “It’s going to start feeling like to make a payout you have to hit more subs and the struggle at current is discoverability at all.”

Brasfield said she would like to see streamers be brought into the conversation about Twitch’s monetisation changes so they are advocated “in earnest.”

“Twitch has been kind of in a holding pattern where their priority is making the platform more money but until they actually try to work more closely with the people who make them money or freely create tools, they’re just going to keep throwing out ideas and ‘initiatives’ that fall flat,” she said.

Leftist streamer Hasan “Hasanabi” Piker took to Twitter saying the reason Twitch made these changes is due to the company not viewing itself as having competition within the livestreaming space, so there’s little reason to offer something that’s truly compelling for its users.

“[I] love twitch but it seems like they’re moving away from [content creators] to fix their profits,” Piker said in a tweet. “Nearly my entire revenue comes from subscribers who elect to give me $US5 ($7) a month. Twitch doesn’t consider the 50/50 split it takes from smaller creators in that process profitable enough. That’s wild.”

“Subscriptions are more important to the life of every streamer than almost any other utility Twitch offers and to touch the split is to financially devastate and potentially remove thousands of full-time creators from your platform it immediately,” JERICHO said.

“What a joke. Makes it worse for everyone except Twitch themselves,” Jacksepticeye said.

“Twitch is INSANE if they think this will go over well,” Max “Gassy Mexican” Gonzalez said. “Like actually will shake the platform in the worst way possible.”

Kotaku reached out to Twitch for comment.

While these proposed changes are reported to hit the website as soon as this summer, anonymous sources told Bloomberg none of these changes have been finalised.



  • With post-pandemic viewership down and inflated market, the only way for companies to post rising profits to satisfy shareholders is to gouge customers, creators, clients or advertisers.

    Perfect opportunity for Youtube to jump in a deliver real change to their live stream platform to attract people… bit will they?

    • The issue is most corporations have seen a major rise in profits since the pandemic leading to many to come to the obvious conclusion that stuff like this is nothing more then greedy profiteering. Don’t believe the excuses or misdirection, just look at their quarterly profits/earnings.

      • I think one of the most egregious examples I’ve seen of this was Games Workshop, which I think most people would have agreed their products were questionably expensive even before.

        They posted record profits last year, go figure people stuck at home might buy more Warhammer to paint, and then just recently raised prices on a number of items in a number of regions (in some cases by as much as 20%) citing that it was ‘necessary’ due to rising costs.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!