![Physical Games Now Require ‘In-Game Purchase’ Disclosures In Australia [Updated]](https://imgix.kotaku.com.au/content/uploads/sites/3/2020/08/18/classification-microtransactions-labels-australia.png?ar=16%3A9&auto=format&fit=crop&q=65&w=800)
See Games Differently
See Games Differently
australian classification board
Leah Williams
Joining the likes of Fallout 3, Crimecraft and Risen, We Happy Few is the latest victim of the Australian video game classification rating system’s “drug clause”. As revealed by Kotaku, it was the use of “Joy” as essentially an unavoidable game mechanic that promoted the banhammer. That’s not an R18+…
Mature content? That’s all well and good, but what if the game is a bad port? What if it launches straight into microtransactions? What if it’s a sequel with over 60% copypasta? We thought it best to inform the Classification Board of the labels gamers really want to see.
After being refused classification, then re-submitted to the Review Board, the Classification Board has reached a final verdict on the local fate of Saints Row 4.
There are no more articles to be viewed
Log in to Kotaku to:
- Comment on stories
By logging in, you can access these features throughout our network.
Haven't registered?
Sign up here
Lost your password?
Click here to reset
Back to Login?
Click here
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Now you can get the top stories from Kotaku delivered to your inbox. Enter your email below.
By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.