All That Ultraviolence Bothers The People Who Make Video Games, Too

Did all the neck-stabbing, animal-killing, city-destroying carnage at E3 stand out to you this year? Whether you were there in person or not, it was hard not to notice the uptick in egregious on-screen violence at the 2012 edition of the expo and that rising trend dominated much of the talk coming out in the aftermath of the show.

Hell, even the high-powered folks behind some of the show's biggest games and platforms found themselves surprised at the amount gore and pain doled out at E3. In a recent interview with Games Industry International, Warren Spector says that the following:

The ultraviolence has to stop. We have to stop loving it. I just don't believe in the effects argument at all, but I do believe that we are fetishizing violence, and now in some cases actually combining it with an adolescent approach to sexuality. I just think it's in bad taste. Ultimately I think it will cause us trouble.

Spector's currently working on Epic Mickey 2 but once upon a time he himself helped make Deus Ex, a first-person game with its own share of violent gameplay. But the approach that he and his Ion Storm colleagues took was a bit different, he says:

We've gone too far. The slow-motion blood spurts, the impalement by deadly assassins, the knives, shoulders, elbows to the throat. You know, Deus Ex had its moments of violence, but they were designed - whether they succeeded or not I can't say -- but they were designed to make you uncomfortable, and I don't see that happening now.

I think we're just appealing to an adolescent mindset and calling it mature. It's time to stop. I'm just glad I work for a company like Disney, where not only is that not something that's encouraged, you can't even do it, and I'm fine with it.

Aside from Spector, Microsoft exec and longtime games industry insider Phil Harrison said that he was also taken aback by all the ultraviolence in an Edge interview:

"I was surprised, I must admit, at some of the games. I think it's an inevitable progression of visual reality and visceral immersion that games can get quite ultra-realistic.

Harrison's less worried, though, because he feels other offerings can counteract violent games as far as the big picture is concerned:

"Thankfully, everybody adheres to a very good ratings system, and makes sure that consumers are well-informed before they buy their games. I think it's more coincidental than anything -- I don't think it's a strategy that everybody has adopted simultaneously. So long as it's part of a balanced portfolio, it's OK."

At a sensory overload extravaganza like E3, loud, noisy and shocking tends to win the day. The goal of the gameplay demo, trailers and booth babes is to turn attendees' heads and steal their attention from competing games and publishers. But what both Spector and Harrison's comments have in common is a sense that the relationship between what gets prominently shown at E3 and what the video game medium is capable of is proportionately off.


    We don't have to stop loving it and they don't have to stop making it. Sure, some games rely far too much on gore to sell but in the long run the market will deal with that automatically. As an adult why the hell would I be overly interested in children's Disney movies? Get real. Yes many games take a highly adolescent approach to certain elements but who cares? If you don't like it, don't play it.

    They will keep doing it until hopefully, one day, it starts getting old.

    Too much blood and gore desensitizes me to it. I didn't feel impacted by Mortal Kombat at all.

      because mortal kombat is a fucking cartoon.


    Violence has been in entertainment for as long as entertainment has existed, and gaming have just come up with a new way to express it. I don't think they're any more or less likely to breed psychopaths than any other medium out there, and if there's a market for it, that's what's going to be produced.
    Personally, I play Mario just as much as Bioshock;so long as the game is good, the violence isn't important.

      I think alot of people who have responded negatively to the remarks by spector and co arent responding to what he has said. They are responding to stuff they remember other people saying.
      Case in point, spector hasnt made any connection at all between violence in games and breeding pyschopaths, thats not what he was talking about at all.

    I've always wondered why the world is obsessed with violence but is so offended by nudity/sex?

      They use one to vent their frustration at a lack of the other?

      It's more the USA than anyone else, most likely due to their extremely serious view on religion. The Bible is littered with extreme violence, but very little in the way of sex, apparently.
      Having said that, it'd be nice if more games at least gave us some less-violent options, i.e. Deus Ex.


    'Please play my Mickey Game and not those other ultraviolent ones'

    People who say things like "we have to stop doing this" when it comes to media, I feel like saying, how about you do something different and convince us that its better? Its such a narrow and absurd argument ,as if their own predilections should govern what an entire industry produces. Im sorry, if you find ultraviolence bad in video games, produce non-ultraviolent video games which are more compelling.

    Everyone always says how violence is so easy and dumb, its kind of an insult to creative people who make amazing games which have violence in them.

    I look forward to a whole new generation of people raised with more and more realistic video game violence, hardcore online porn, virtual friends and a myriad of internet social disorders.

    Its a bright new world, but they'll always have their ipads.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now