Gamers Angry After Australian Esports Organiser Misses Deadline To Pay Prizes

Gamers Angry After Australian Esports Organiser Misses Deadline To Pay Prizes

The Australian Call of Duty community is enjoying one of its best years ever, thanks to the introduction of Activision’s Call of Duty World League and a massive amount of prizes on offer.

But 2016 has also brought new frustrations, with a Queensland-based tournament organisation owing money to players and teams from events as far back as last July.

The organisation is called Doesplay, a Queensland registered company that hosts free-to-play and paid gaming tournaments. As part of their services, they also offer a subscription service that increases the amount of tournaments players can participate in per day while also allowing access to premium events.

But prizes have been, to use Doesplay’s own language from late December, extremely delayed. Issues with late payments were so severe that Doesplay cancelled a live event in February, with the funds instead “being used to alleviate” unpaid prizes.

The unpaid prizes, according to players, extend as far back as July and August.

Doesplay director and owner Rob Lineker claims this is part of the organisation’s terms and conditions, which state that Doesplay can “withhold payments for longer than advertised above”.

Doesplay told players that it was aiming to clear all outstanding payments by the end of January or, in some instances, as soon as possible. But its self-imposed deadline has passed, and those affected are furious.

“I have been owed since August of 2015,” said one affected player, who is due $867.50 from multiple Doesplay premium events. He’d been contacting Doesplay and Lineker directly, with the Doesplay owner apologising on December 21 for not having paid prizes yet.

Another player, who wished to remain anonymous, is owed hundreds of dollars from nearly nine events spanning July to November. He’s contacted Doesplay and Lineker for a resolution; Lineker apologised shortly after the deadline lapsed for a lack of communication. The Doesplay director also declined to give an ETA on when prizes might be paid in the future, but stressed that players were still being paid and all outstanding prizes would be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

“There’s been people owed different amounts of money from different events and we’re just working through those players, whether or not they want a refund from an event or to still be paid prizes out in which case we’re offering those simultaneously at the moment,” Lineker said. “And we’re still paying players as of two days ago, paying out certain players.”

We contacted Lineker on Friday, February 5. He claimed communication has improved and all open tickets and messages that required replying to had been answered. “I 100 per cent believe communication was lacking and that was solely my fault, we’ve replied to every internal ticket, we’ve replied to every Twitter DM that needs to be replied to, we’ve replied to,” he said.

“Yeah, so communication, we dropped the ball pretty hard on that on. But everything else we’re doing in the player’s interests as best as we can.”

Yet none of the players that have reached out have received any further updates, assurances or deadlines from Lineker or other Doesplay staffers as to when their tickets will be resolved. Some say they haven’t received a reply via Twitter or Doesplay’s support system since last year, contradicting what Lineker claimed.

An equally concerning situation was the lack of clarity. We asked the Doesplay director why Doesplay didn’t inform players and teams that payments would be delayed into February, or longer.

Kotaku: If you knew you were going to reach your January deadline and you weren’t going to be able to pay your prizes, why was there not a public communication informing people you were going to miss your deadline, as opposed to the deadline coming up, being missed and then players discovering with no information whatsoever?

Lineker: I mean we communicated that on February 2nd, but tha-

Kotaku: But you would have known beforehand [that you were going to miss the deadline]. You would have known at least a week before.

Lineker: But that’s, we didn’t know that. We still had certain things to line up and get sorted.

Kotaku: So how tight was your budget that you could be days within your deadline and not know, still be on the fence as to whether you’d be able to pay out your prizes or not?

Lineker: I don’t want to talk about that, that’s internal stuff. Basically players, some players have paid to us play in our competitions. That has stopped now, we don’t charge people to play on our server unless they want to play more than one event, which more often than not is a free event, which they wouldn’t have to pay for or wouldn’t win any prizes anyway.

All the players have that requested [inaudible] refunds, and they are in constant communication as to when they would receive their prizes. And in our terms we are able to delay prizes when we see fit. Players sign up to our events knowing that.

Lineker claims specific dates as to when players might be paid can’t be provided. It’s a curious stance given that Doesplay set a January deadline for themselves.

“I understand the players frustration,” said the Doesplay director. “We’ve done everything for this community and put in tens of thousands of dollars in to players pockets. We will continue to work hard for the competitive gaming community.”

Unfortunately, while previous good deeds can buy you time it’s unlikely to quell the anger of players left in the dark. Lineker told me that Doesplay is aiming to run a live event later this year, potentially in August.


  • If a player or team is owed more than $2,000 in winnings, they should issue Doesplay Pty Ltd (I am assuming that is their legal entity), with a Statutory Demand pursuant to s.459E of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The demand would effectively force Doesplay to pay up within 21 days or risk being wound up. Whilst no one wants to see organisers punished, it is in everyone’s best interest to remove those who are dishonest or insolvent from the scene.

    • it is in everyone’s best interest to remove those who are dishonest or insolvent from the scene.

      Sure is. They might not be insolvent now but sure sounds like they are close. Better to wind it up now or Rob could be looking down the barrel of large fines and even imprisonment.

  • From the sounds of it, the second point of the T&Cs was deliberately put in as an escape clause. I’m guessing they either didn’t realise what they were getting into or were hoping they could get more from entrant fees than they had to pay out.

  • Doesplay even cancelled a live event in February, with the “funds of which are being used to alleviate” unpaid prizes

    I’m not sure if I’m understanding that bit correctly – does that mean that money people paid to enter the February event is instead being used to pay out the unpaid prizes from previous events? That’s starting to sound like some kind of dodgy pyramid scheme.

      • They’re near enough the same thing, aren’t they?

        Basically a scheme where new investors’ money is used to pay returns to older investors.

  • At the very least, players should take away from this that the company is unreliable, willing to lie and willing to put exploitative terms in their conditions and actively use them. Even if they had good intentions, which seems extremely unlikely at this point, they have demonstrated fundamental incompetence in operating a paid competition.

    Companies like this are a poison to the competitive gaming community and should be avoided in future at all costs. Anyone tied up in this mess, my advice would be to seek legal advice, pursue winnings to the fullest extent possible, but never engage with them or participate in their events again.

Show more comments

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!