In Defence Of Harry Potter And The Cursed Child

Jamie Parker (as Harry Potter), Noma Dumezweni (Hermione Granger), and Paul Thornley (Ron Weasley) star in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. (Photo: Official Site)

It's wild that an eighth Harry Potter story exists in the world and almost no one talks about it. I'm referring, of course, to Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the stage production that debuted in London back in 2016 and will open in Australia in 2019.

The show is an official, JK Rowling-approved continuation of her massively popular Harry Potter franchise, but for many reasons, it still hasn't dug itself into pop culture like its predecessors or other popular franchise sequels.

Now, the reasons for that are fairly well-documented. First is the fact it's a stage production in two cities globally (for now), and while fans can buy and read the script, its true form is largely inaccessible to most people. Then there's the fact that Rowling didn't write it.

She helped conceive the story with Jack Thorne and John Tiffany but left the actual writing to Thorne. Many fans have made a bigger deal of this than it deserves, as Rowling obviously was hugely influential on all the major decisions — but, no, technically, she didn't write it.

And yes, there's the fact many fans simply don't like it. They feel the whole thing is too fan-servicey. Too different from the classic Potter tone. The characters are too obnoxious. And many think one character, in particular, is very, very problematic. That's a spoiler, though, so we'll get back to that in a minute.

Draco Malfoy (Alex Price) talks to the Wizarding World in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. (Photo: Lyric Theatre)

Having said all of that, I still think it's weird people aren't talking about Cursed Child right alongside Deathly Hallows, Half-Blood Prince, and even Fantastic Beasts. Sure, it's in a unique format and yes, it's very different from those stories in a lot of ways.

But it's still Harry and his friends (and this time, his family) getting into a big, action-packed adventure against evil. Even if it's The Godfather Part III of the Harry Potter franchise, it's still part of the Harry Potter franchise.

Sitting down to actually watch Cursed Child in person, it becomes pretty obvious why the show is its own cursed child. And that's because of the simple fact that most people can't see it in its intended form. I was lucky enough to see the show in New York a few weeks back and, frankly, it's magnificent.

Reading the words on the page is one thing. Seeing actors on stage is another. Maybe while reading you were imagining grown-up or made-up versions of Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint. Watching Jamie Parker, Noma Dumezweni, and Paul Thornley (or whomever else is playing Harry, Hermione, and Ron) in person changes that. You forget about the actors from the Potter movies.

These people are those characters now. And at that moment, your Potter adoration and nostalgia comes rushing back. You remember why you love this franchise, these characters, this world, and you realise you are surrounded by that world at that moment. It's a very powerful, emotional feeling that, in turn, makes a few complaints about the story feel insignificant by comparison.

That happens too when you see the absolute majesty of the production itself. The sets, the scene changes, the costumes, actual magic — all of those elements help make Cursed Child feel so much bigger than you can imagine by just reading the script.

Add to that the show's length (it runs about five hours and you have to see it in two parts) and the entirety of the experience becomes completely overwhelming. You are in a room witnessing the eighth part of Harry Potter's story, one you can only see in two places in the world.

Harry Potter and his son Albus (played by Sam Clemmett) have an emotional moment. (Photo: Official Site)

Then there's the story itself which, like the experience of watching the show, is so overwhelmingly massive and impactful, a page can hardly attempt to contain it. Performed on a stage, though, at a specific pace, with pauses, music, cliffhangers, etc., everything about it becomes more focused and manageable. This is good, because the specifics of what happens basically takes all the imaginative stuff from the seven Potter books and shoves it into one story.

First, you have to come to terms with Harry Potter being an adult with kids of his own; right off the bat, that's a little difficult to comprehend. Then there's the structure, which takes place over many years.

You also have to recall all the character-developing interactions from the original books (or movies) to appreciate some of the established relationships. There's no refresher course.

Finally, you have to be OK watching a "Harry Potter" story where "Harry Potter" isn't the star.

He's hugely important but, really, story is more about his son, Albus, who teams up with Scorpius Malfoy (son of Draco) to try and save Cedric Diggory, hoping to prove their worth in the Wizarding World. Yes, the same Cedric Diggory who died in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire several decades ago, which means Albus and Scorpius have to use a time turner (a device used in the books) to go back in time.

Admittedly, it's awkward for a Potter story to centre itself almost entirely on the concept of time travel. It's weirder still when that time travel is possible thanks to a special time turner that can go back in time further than usual. All of that feels a little forced.

Eventually, though, the boys' actions in the past screw up the present in all kinds of wild ways, leading to Voldemort overcoming Harry and taking over the world.

And that's just part one.

Albus and Scorpius (Anthony Boyle) hatch a plan. (Photo: Lyric Theatre)

It's a lot to take in but damned if it's not exciting. Going back into the other books, while risky, opens up all kinds of wonderful, dynamic, challenging opportunities and Cursed Child deals with all of them and more. It's a huge ask for the audience to be OK with a time travel story of this magnitude, but because it's a world of magic, even if it's not comfortable, it makes sense.

Then there's the "cursed child," a new character herself, Delphi, who is revealed (final major spoiler here) as the child of Voldemort and Bellatrix Lestrange. Here's where most people really have a problem with Cursed Child, because this whole character creates major issues. First, she challenges a major part of the Potter universe itself because her existence humanises Voldemort and Bellatrix.

They were lovers, which feels almost too nice for them. There's also the little matter that Bellatrix would have had to have the child before she died in the Battle of Hogwarts, which takes place in the books.

So Delphi was born during the books. However, none of the books or movies ever mention her pregnancy, so it feels very retconned. Then again, we don't spend a lot of time with Bellatrix in the original stories so it's absolutely plausible nine months passed at some point without us knowing what she was doing.

And in that time, she could have had Delphi, sent her away, and boom, here we are.

Still, Delphi is a bit of an issue. But as you watch Cursed Child in person, she almost feels like a non-entity. Yes, she's there throughout and becomes the major foe in Part II, but so much is happening in between it's very easy to forget about her. This is good, because it means seeing the production in person smooths out yet another aspect of the story many fans have problems with.

The cast of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. (Photo: Lyric Theatre)

Walking out of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is a transformative experience. You've seen the next chapter in a beloved, timeless story unfold just for you (and a few hundred other people). It happened. It's canon. And it makes sense how most people not having that personal experience has held the show back from reaching the heights of its more popular predecessors, both in print and on the big screen.

But once you see the show, there's no way to get it out of your head. No way to forget these characters, this story, and for this story to become as much a part of Harry Potter lore as anything else.

You can see Cursed Child in Melbourne from January 16 next year at the Princess Theatre. More details can be found here.


Comments

    I read the book and loved every minute of it. I personally think fandom is its own worst enemy. Time again, this same cycle continues again and again. Franchise after franchise. People get so wrapped up in continuity and the thought they alone know how to write or make something great, they dont stop to think that if something has a flaw, it is not necessarily a flaw, it is just something they dont like.

      The reason the fandom doesn't like this sequel is because it's bad. The play itself is amazing to watch, but the actual story makes no sense. Every sequel faces the problem of telling a new story while still being true to what come before. This fails to do so. You can't expect fans, that cherish every part of the originals, to find out rules of how the world works suddenly changed and not be upset. You need only look at SW and all the backlash Lucas faced when he changed the OT.

      I wouldn't think of myself as a Potter fanboy - I love Harry Potter, but only because it's well-written. However, I am a fanboy for a good story. I was really excited to see this play to finish the HP story, however, in all honesty, this article has turned me off it.

      I can handle the fact that Rowling didn't write the story. I can handle Hermione being portrayed as black. I think I could even handle Voldemort and Bellatrix being lovers. But using a time-turner to try and go back and rescue Cedric Diggory is baaaaad writing. Firstly, it rewrites the application of the time-turner. We know how the time-turner works, it is established that it can be used for short periods and when it is used it doesn't alter history so much as fold a new paradigm into the existing timeline. The idea that the time-turner could be used in this way begs the question, why would Dumbeldore trust such a powerful and dangerous artifact to Hermione so that she could take extra classes? Why didn't they ever use it again? And why is it creating paradoxes when it didn't work that way before?

      My second issue is the direct messing with the existing continuity by travelling back in time to previous books. As a narrative device, this is designed to make the audience rethink the way these events played out the first time, "Oh, look, there was another element to this event you weren't aware of". Which, in turn, makes it seem like the sole intent of it's use here is to challenge the fandom. "You love this, but did you know it ACTUALLY happened like this?"

      Time travel can be an amazing plot device when it's done well, but an awful one when done badly. Introducing time travel as a major plot element in the last chapter of a story that is capable of retconning earlier narratives is simply not good writing. Most importantly, a story set 20 years after the original books that is set focused on the plot of the original books seems like it doesn't have legs. Yes, the events of the original books had a far-reaching impact on the world. But ultimately, I was there for these stories the first time around. I enjoyed them, if I want to revisit them I can go back and read them. What I want from a sequel is to see characters moving forward, not backward. I want to see a story that focuses on what has happened after I left the characters.

      Very sorry, Germaine, but your article has had the opposite effect and talked me out of seeing this. Bummer.

    I'm not a colossal Potter fan but...
    Voldemort and Bellatrix being romantically involved is ridiculous. It's well established in the books that Voldemort's biggest flaw is an inability to understand or feel love or really form attachment to others. I don't see how this plot point makes much sense...

      I mean, it's absolute, isn't it? Like, one who was conceived during the effects of a love potion was incapable of feeling love?

      I was never that indepth with HP lore though, so idk, but either way Voldemort never seem to be the sex/romance seeking type, power I could see, and he had that in spades.

      Agreed. As a plot point this makes 0 sense.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now