Riot Games Says It Finds No Evidence Of Wrongdoing By CEO Accused Of Sexual Harassment

Riot Games Says It Finds No Evidence Of Wrongdoing By CEO Accused Of Sexual Harassment
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Kotaku Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

A three-person special committee tasked with reviewing a third-party investigation into allegations of sexual harassment by Riot Games CEO Nicolo Laurent announced to the company’s staff today that it found “no evidence” of misconduct and recommended no action be taken against the executive, the Washington Post reports. The news comes the same day that Riot Games filed a request in court to speed up the ongoing litigation against Laurent by a former executive assistant at the company, who accused him earlier this year of firing her for refusing his unwanted sexual advances.

“We concluded that there was no evidence that Laurent harassed, discriminated, or retaliated against the plaintiff,” reads part of a statement by the special committee, which is made up of three members of Riot Games’ board of directors. The statement was first obtained by the Washington Post and is now published online at Riot’s website. “We have therefore reached the conclusion that, at the current time…no action should be taken against Laurent.” The committee, consisting of one woman and two men, says its conclusion and recommendation were based on a third-party investigation by Seyfarth Shaw LLP, a law firm known for representing companies in labour negotiations with their employees.

Riot’s CEO Is Being Sued For Sexual Harassment

Riot Games CEO Nicolo Laurent is being sued by former employee Sharon O’Donnell, who is alleging Laurent committed repeated acts of sexual harassment over a number of years, including asking her to “cum” to his house while his wife was away.

Read more

Back in January, former Riot employee Sharon O’Donnell filed a lawsuit against Laurent alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, including in one instance asking her in a message to “cum” to his house while his wife was away. Laurent denies the allegations. “It’s important you hear this from me directly: The allegations of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation involving me are not true,” Laurent wrote in his email to staff today. “Nothing of that nature, or even remotely close to it, ever happened.”

Riot Games and O’Donnell could not immediately be reached for comment.

On its website, the company wrote, “We will use every legal avenue at our disposal to see this case through and ensure that Riot and Nicolo are absolved.”

Inside The Culture Of Sexism At Riot Games

Throughout her three years at Riot Games, the company behind League of Legends, Lacy made it her mission to hire a woman into a leadership role. Lacy had heard plenty of excuses for why her female job candidates weren’t Riot material. Some were “ladder climbers”. Others had “too much ego”....

Read more

The Washington Post reports that Riot’s decision comes as it seeks to push the ongoing litigation with O’Donnell out of the court and into arbitration, and accuses her of witness tampering. Forced arbitration clauses are currently a flashpoint at many companies, including Riot, where a culture of sexism was first reported on at length by Kotaku, because of how they limit current and former employees’ options for seeking justice when mistreated. In 2019, 150 Riot employees held a walkout at the company over these issues, calling on it to drop forced arbitration clauses from its employment agreements.

In February, Wired reported that Laurent continued to employ many of the top executives responsible for creating a sexist “bro” culture at the company. The CEO was not suspended or put on a leave of absence during the recent investigation into his behaviour, the Washington Post reports.

Riot Games is also being sued by former female employees over allegations of gender discrimination and unequal pay. The company managed to force the accusations of discrimination back into arbitration at a hearing earlier this year, while the pay disparity lawsuit continues through the courts. Riot reached a preliminary $US10 ($13) million settlement in the class-action lawsuit back in 2019, but California state regulators have since argued that the settlement should be closer to $US400 ($516) million, and the case remains ongoing.

Riot and Laurent’s latest statements come a day after League of Legends sponsor Alienware reportedly cut ties with the organisation nearly a year before its existing deal was set to expire.

Comments

  • // the special committee, which is made up of three members of Riot Games’ board of directors //
    Company investigates self, finds no issue.

    Well, case closed then I guess.

    • Well no, the investigation was done by an independent third party, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, who wasn’t linked to the company. They’ve at least used an outside source to investigate it and not internalised it like a lot of dodgy places will.

      • Not speaking specifically to this case but more generally…

        “Independent third parties” or often subjective. I’ve been in organizations in the past that have often called on independent third parties to do something when the third party is just someone we’ve known well and worked with (but not directly, i.e. they worked for someone else we worked with) for many years. As long as no contractual link was established, we could determine they were a independent third party but realistically they weren’t really (though I should caveat this by saying we didn’t deal with any legal matters)

        Also, investigation conclusions are often influenced heavily by the scope of the investigation, methodolgy and details of the findings (none of which would be revealed here given the legal implications). We’ve also in the past taken advantage of strategically calling investigations with very narrow terms of reference such that the outcome was essentially pre-determined…

        • Or maybe, they didn’t actually find anything.
          If he sent her a message anything like what she said, it should’ve been pretty easy to find

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!